Court : Delhi
Reported in : 16(1979)DLT266; ILR1979Delhi601; 1979RLR497
..... the land for planned development under the act. section 12 is concerned only with the planned development. if has nothing to do with acquisition of property; acquisition generally precedes development. for planned development in an area other than a development area; it is only necessary to obtain the sanction or ..... preclude development, that putting up a residential colony can be done consistenly with the provisions of the cantonment act, that the basic reason for acquisition in cases like this is to prevent private colonies from developing and to regulate the development of new colonies residential or otherwise though a statutory ..... zone g :' 'uses permitted : local state and central government offices and use for defense purposes; research institutions; social and central institutions; bus and railway passenger terminals and public utility buildings. local municipal facilities, uses incidental to government offices and for their use. parking requirements must be approved. 'use prohibited : .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : [2008]87SCL51(Delhi)
..... functions if rights are affected, rules of natural justice step in. the principles settled by ridge v. baldwin (1963) 2 all er 66 are well known. thereforee, to the extent, konkan rly.corpn.ltd. v. rani construction (p) ltd. : [2002]1scr728 states that no notice need be issued to the opposite party to give him an opportunity of being heard before ..... the scope of power of the appropriate government under section 17(4) of the land acquisition act. under section 17(4) of the land acquisition act, the acquiring authority has been empowered to invoke urgency powers for acquisition of a land on a subjective satisfaction that the purpose of acquisition of the land is urgent. the apex court has held that such a decision .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : ILR1978Delhi536
..... him forgiving false evidence. the question that matters is not even whetherwe have' to act on, his evidence, which seems rather difficult to actupon, but whether the passenger's list itself should follow the namein the reservation chart or not. the entry in the reservation chartis the primary entry from which other entries are made. it is ..... the air ticket) he maintained it showed thisname 'j. jaggi'. he volunteered that his reason for saying so wasthat in case of difficulty in regard to name, the passenger would givehis correct name and that name would be entered in the passengerlist. but what was the difficulty in this case except what was contrived (even without justification) by ..... respect has been already discussed at length;it remains to discuss the evidence of o. p. (d. w. f)) ofthe indian airlines who referred to the name in the passengers list(ex. d.w. 6/a) reading 'j. jaggi.' d.w. 6 admitted that he wasdischarged from the army earlier, i.e. before he entered with indian airlines .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Reported in : (1988)25ITD193(Delhi)
..... the well-known decision of the supreme court in the case of cit v. b.c. srinivasa setty [1981] 128 itr 294 that since the cost of its acquisition was nil, no capital gains tax could be levied. (the import entitlement was no doubt considered as a capital asset) : (1) cit v. t. kuppuswamy ..... this category would be linked to additional exports of a promotion nature...." similarly to neutralise the disadvantages of freight differential formation of indigenous shipping companies was encouraged and shipping corpn. of india was incorporated. railways also provided concessional tariff for carrying goods from the manufacturing centre to the port of loading.alexander ..... their production with a view to entering into enduring relationships with overseas importers.... (ix) among the inadequacies of the existing infrastructure, for exports, that of shipping facilities needs to be emphasised. (x) a steady growth of export earnings @ 7 per cent per annum can be achieved only if adequate export performance .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... travelling had tinted glasses and its windows were rolled up which would have substantially reduced visibility indica car was moving at a high speed (iii) (iv) the santro passengers escaped by scrambling out of windows (v) indiscriminate firing from the indica towards the black santro (vi) no complaint made by the occupants of the santro despite all ..... crime, as described by the prosecution witnesses, at the drink cart, the speeding indica went passed the santro in a matter of moments. the santro s passengers were engaged in buying drinks with attention diverted towards this. two persons with half their body sticking out of the left side windows of the indica were shooting ..... of a common intention. .... (emphasis by us) 226. ld. senior counsel would submit that it is the prosecution case that rajesh pandey was only a co-passenger in the indica car from which the assailants shot at the victims. the prosecution has levied the same allegations against sushil arora. is this mere presence in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... of the contract bus while boarding the same to reach their destination. the four convicts and their associates must have been believed to be bonafide driver/conductor/cleaner/passengers. it was on account of such representation by the convicts leading to belief that they were being taken to their destination in the contract bus, they fell ..... the convicts indulged in a deliberately planned crime and meticulous execution by alluring the victim and her friend (pw-1) in the bus pretending to be ferrying passengers to the destination. it may be noticed that except the young age of the convicts and dependence of their family on them, learned counsel for the convicts could ..... have comfortable journey at an affordable fare, little realizing what the destiny had in store for them. while boarding the contract bus with some persons sitting on passengers seats, she expected a comfortable return journey to her home in the company of her friend. the luxury bus with dark window panes proved haven for the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 12, 2017 + W.P.(C) 7828/2016, CM No.32352/2016 ANIRBAN BHATTACHARYA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Trideep Pais and Ms. Vrinda Bhandari, Advs. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY THR ITS REGISTRAR JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ginny J.Rautray, Ms. Kanchan Kaur Dhodhi and Ms. Anushka Ashok, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-"In the facts and circumstances set out above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court be pleased to: a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records, quash and set aside respondents i) ii) Office Order No.197/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016; Appellate Committee proceedings dated Nil, based W.P.(C) No.7828/2016 Page 1 of 53 2. on which Office Order No.197/CP/2016 dated 22.8.2016 came to be passed; iii) ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... apart from the fact that it does not explain the other injuries. pw-12/kamta pandey has deposed that there was no rod or pipe with which head of the passenger could strike nor was any such brakes applied by which the head could have struck anything causing the injury. the respondent in his statement under section 313 of cr.p .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... apart from the fact that it does not explain the other injuries. pw-12/kamta pandey has deposed that there was no rod or pipe with which head of the passenger could strike nor was any such brakes applied by which the head could have struck anything causing the injury. the respondent in his statement under section 313 of cr.p .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... apart from the fact that it does not explain the other injuries. pw-12/kamta pandey has deposed that there was no rod or pipe with which head of the passenger could strike nor was any such brakes applied by which the head could have struck anything causing the injury. the respondent in his statement under section 313 of cr.p .....
Tag this Judgment!