Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: konkan passenger ships acquisition act 1973 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 373 results (0.193 seconds)

J.S. Parkar Vs. V.B. Palekar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1974]94ITR616(Bom)

..... has been some blurring of perspective. the income-tax officer proceeded on the footing that there had been an investment and inferred payment by the petitioner for the acquisition of the gold. the appellate assistant commissioner proceeded on the footing that section 69a applied and that from the facts which had been proved in the criminal proceedings ..... great hardship and consequently calls for close scrutiny and analysis. the petitioner (assessee) was carrying on business of transporting iced fishes, mangoes and other goods by sea from konkan ports to bombay. he was the owner of a launch 'lakshmi'. on 24th april, 1961, the central excise authorities seized 4,999 biscuits of gold weighing 10 ..... not much importance can be attached to the role played by the unknown and mysterious muslim. he could have been there only with a view to identify the foreign ship and bring the gold on board the assessee's launch 'lakshmi'. he would not have been allowed to slip away by the crew of 'lakshmi' had he .....

United States Vs. Scrap

Court : US Supreme Court

..... by the court is, however, plainly inapposite. there, the cab suspended the rates proposed by the carriers, but suggested in their place "a complete and innovative scheme for setting all passenger rates for the continental united states." id. at 899. it was clear that, when the carriers filed the rates suggested by the board, they would not be suspended. "even a ..... accept for the present appellees' assertions that the interim surcharge, by raising page 412 u. s. 726 the cost of shipping recyclable materials, will further accentuate the allegedly unjustifiable disparity between the cost of shipping those materials and the cost of shipping primary goods, thereby irrationally encouraging the use of primary goods which will lead to a further degradation of our environment. in .....

Lekshmi Amma and ors. Vs. Anandan Nambiar and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1974Ker82

..... themselves constitute a tavazhi. a gift beauest or acquisition in the name or names of the wife alone, or of the wife and one or more of the children alone to the exclusion of the others, would not give ..... provision in itself. prior to the marumakkathayam act, the position under the customary marumukkathayam law was, the (that) a presumption of the tavazhi nature of the gift or beauest or acquisition would be raised only if the same was in favour, or in the name/names, of the wife and all the children, or of all the children alone, who by ..... court (pandrang row and king jj.) in krishnan v. thala (air 1941 mad 605) that the section did not have any retrospective operation and that in the case of an acquisition prior to the date of the act, the mode of division was per capita and not per stirpes the acqui-sition there was in the year 1881, by the husband .....

Ramesh Himmatlal Shah Vs. Harsukh Jhadavji Joshi

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR375

..... flats pursuant to their being the holders of shares in the said society are not the owners thereof.37. again after referring to the full bench decision in manohar v. konkan co.-op. housing socy. at p. 1006 vimadalal j., after noticing that the member was not a tenant nor the society his landlord but that the relationship between the ..... it is in my view necessary to, therefore, find out as to what is the legal concept of what is popularly known as an 'ownership flat.'30. in manohar v. konkan co-op. housing socy : air1962bom154 , f.b which was a decision of the full bench of this high court, certain observations were made as to the relationship between a co ..... tenant in a co-operative housing society cannot part with a flat by way of sale or otherwise without the previous consent of the society. after referring to manohar v. konkan co.-op. housing socy : air1962bom154 , f.b a pull bench decision of this court and vyankatraya v. shivrambhat i.l.r. (1883) bom. 256 vaidya j. found that an .....

State Vs. Gali Chalapathi Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1974CriLJ1424

Sambasiya Rao, J.1. This Criminal Revision case has boon placed before us in a Division Bench on a reference made by our learned brother Mukhtadar, J. The question of law that arises in the case and which has been argued before us at great length is whether the Court has power and discretion, while remanding the accused to custody under Section 344, Cr.P.C. to remand him into police custody. To put the question in other words It is, whether the Court has to remand an accuseed, while dealing with an offence which it has taken cognizance of, only to judicial or jail custody and has no discretion whatever under any circumstances to remand him to police custody.2. This question has arisen in the following manner. One K. Vedagiri Rao was attacked in the afternoon of 27-10.72 by a large number of persons and was caused fatal injuries to which he succumbed subsequently. 19 persons were charged under Sections 302, 149, 148, 120B, I.P.C. etc. Though all the accused were absconding for some time...

Mitchell Vs. W. T. Grant Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... when it is supposed to have been founded in error, [so] that [our] judicial authority should hereafter depend altogether on the force of the reasoning by which it is supported." passenger cases, 7 how. 283, 48 u. s. 470 (1849). moreover, reconsideration is particularly appropriate in the present case. to the extent that the fuentes opinion established a procrustean rule of .....

Regional Rail Reorganization Act Cases

Court : US Supreme Court

..... other "uniform" provisions of the constitution. the head money cases, 112 u. s. 580 (1884), involved the levy on ships' agents or owners of a 50-cent tax for any passenger not a united states citizen who entered an american port from a foreign port "by steam or sail vessel." individuals engaged ..... ], is authorized to enter into agreements with railroads in reorganization in the region (or railroads leased, operated, or controlled by railroads in reorganization) for the acquisition, maintenance, or improvement of railroad facilities and equipment necessary to improve property that will be in the final system plan. agreements entered into pursuant to this ..... noted: "the obligational authority of the association is limited to $150,000,000 to finance the secretary's agreements with railroads in reorganization for the acquisition, maintenance and improvement of rail facilities prior to the completion of the final system plan. under the bill, any additional obligation authority necessary for the .....

Dunlop Vs. Bachowski

Court : US Supreme Court

..... at this time. it obviously presents some difficulty in light of the strong evidence that congress deliberately gave exclusive enforcement authority to the secretary. [ footnote 12 ] see passenger page 421 u. s. 576 corp. v. passengers assn., 414 u. s. 453 , 414 u. s. 465 (1974) (brennan, j., concurring); nader v. saxbe, 162 u.s.app.d.c. 89, 92-93, n .....

The Associated Cotton Traders Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1977)2MLJ335

S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.1. The unsuccessful plaintiffs in O.S. No. 247 of 1974 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore, are the appellants herein. They filed the suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 44,287-15 from the respondent-defendant viz., the Southern Railway, towards the damages alleged to have been suffered by them due to the loss of cotton caused on account of the alleged negligence and default of duty on the part of the servants of the defendant railway. It was alleged that the first plaintiff despatched 135 bales of full pressed cotton from Washim Railway Station in Madhya Pradesh State to Pulankinar Railway Station in Madras State (now Tamil Nadu) under Railway Receipts Nos. 725059 and 725058 dated 3rd February, 1964 at railway risk, in pursuance of the order placed by the second plaintiff with the first plaintiff. The third plaintiff viz. the Pioneer Fire and General Insurance Co. had covered the said consignments by issuing a policy in favour of the ...

Binod Rao Vs. Minocher Rustom Masani

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR125

..... of the powers conferred by the said section 5(8) the central board of revenue issued instructions laying down the principles to be applied by assessing authorities in assessing foreign shipping- companies. these instructions were not followed by the income-tax officer, and in making the assessment he did not allow certain allowances to the assessees. the supreme court held that .....