Khandsari - Judgment Search Results
Kumar Khandsari Works Vs. Assessing Officer (Assessing Officer V. Kuma ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-17-1993
Reported in: (1994)49TTJ(Del)286
shall first take up the appeal of the assessed.2. assessed is a firm engaged in the business of Khandsari. It had filed two separate returns of income-one for the period from 4th Oct., 1984 to 25th July,
Kurali Khandsari Udyog Vs. Excise Commissioner and Controller of Molas ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-20-2004
Reported in: AIR2004SC3797; 2004(3)AWC2178(SC); 2004(4)SCALE792; (2004)4SCC580
and 19th December, 1997, which prohibited transport of 'any molasses' without permission. The Appellants who are manufacturer of Khandsari molasses felt aggrieved by these Order and challenged the same on the ground that such a restriction imposes
Laxmi Khandsari and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-09-1981
Reported in: AIR1981SC873; 1981(1)SCALE455; (1981)2SCC600; [1981]3SCR92
1966 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Control Order') directed that no power crusher, with certain exceptions, of a khandsari unit or any agent of such owner in the reserved area of a mill could be worked until
18-section briefs on any result in this list
B. Kishanlal Khandsari Sugar Mills Vs. Dinkar Maharaj and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-13-2007
Reported in: 2007(4)ALD259; 2007(3)ALT602
by the landlords seeking eviction of the tenant. His case was that the premises in question consisting of Khandsari Sugar Mill, three large sized godowns, thirteen RCC constructed rooms, two chowkidar sheds along with adjacent land, all
Jagdamba Khandsari Udyog Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-09-1997
Reported in: 1998(75)LC517(Allahabad)
Matched in: Parties Jagdamba Khandsari Udyog Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Sri Ram Khandsari Sugar Mills Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-21-1987
Reported in: [1988]71STC392(AP)
Jeevan Reddy, J.1. Two contentions are urged in this tax revision case. The petitioner is a manufacturer of khandsari sugar. Molasses is a by-product; it is taxed at the rate of 25 per cent at the point
Niwas Khandsari Udyog, Village Hilalpur, Chandpur, Bijnor and Another ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-14-1998
Reported in: 1998(3)AWC2030
Matched in: Parties Niwas Khandsari Udyog, Village Hilalpur, Chandpur, Bijnor and Another Vs. Canara Bank, Bijnor and Another
Deccan Bharat Khandsari Sugar Factory Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-1979
Reported in: (1980)14CTR(AP)11; [1980]123ITR802(AP)
Act made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, A.P., Hyderabad, at the instance of the assessee, M/s. Deccan Bharat Khandsari Sugar Factory, Hyderabad, raises the question ' whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,
Jai Hanuman Khandsari Sugar Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uo ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-27-1977
Reported in: 1977(1)ELT49(AP)
petitions I am disposing them of by this common Judgment.2. The Petitioners in all these writ petitions are Khandsari Sugar Mills. They manufacture Khandsari Sugar. Normally excise duty is payable on the khandsari sugar manufactured in accordance
Prakash Khandsari Mills Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-04-1978
Reported in: [1981]130ITR380(All)
is whether the assessee-firm was rightly treated as an unregistered firm for the assessment year 1969-70.2. Messrs. Prakash Khandsari Mills, the assessee-firm, carried on business under a deed of partnership dated June 19, 1963. The firm consisted
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free