Keeping - Judgment Search Results
Warren Vs. Keep
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-08-1894
Warren v. Keep - 155 U.S. 265 (1894) U.S. Supreme Court Warren v. Keep, 155 U.S. 265 (1894) Warren v. Keep
Keeping in View All the Circumstances but Without Meaning to Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
given by the petitioner himself, the petitioner cannot be held responsible. I have carefully considered the aforesaid contentions. Keeping in view all the circumstances but without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, I
“7. Keeping in View Ratio Decidendi of Abovesaid Rulings and in a Gi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-22-2013
of interim maintenance to them, through the medium of impugned judgment(Annexure P-2), which in substance is as under:-“7. Keeping in view ratio decidendi of abovesaid rulings and in a given set of facts as revisionists-petitioners have been
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Would Keep the Matter Under Carpet Perpetually Without Vs. Harbans Sin ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
per the order of seniority. This does not mean that the State LPA No.689 of 2013(O&M) 2 would keep the matter under carpet perpetually without any effective relief to the aggrieved employees, on the pretext that no
“12. Keeping in View the Afore-stated Facts and Circumstances of the ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-04-2014
the indicated offences. by way of summoning order dated 03.05.2014 (Annexure P-3), which, in substance, is as under:-“12. Keeping in view the afore-stated facts and circumstances of the case as well as the law applicable thereto, this
Pink Housing Keeping vs.centre for Development of Telematics & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:28. 09.2016 Judgment delivered on:25. 10.2016 * % + W.P.(C) 7681/2016 PINK HOUSING KEEPING CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF TELEMATICS & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case:
“contends That Petitioner Is Ready to Keep the Vs. State of Punjab a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “Contends that petitioner is ready to keep the complainant and the minor child in the matrimonial home. On oral request of counsel for the petitioner,
Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited Vs. M/s. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
Sanjay Kumar, J. This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against the order dated 26.08.2014 passed by the learned Company Judge in Company Petition No.235 of 2012 whereby, the said petition filed...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free