Keep - Judgment Search Results
Warren Vs. Keep
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-08-1894
Warren v. Keep - 155 U.S. 265 (1894) U.S. Supreme Court Warren v. Keep, 155 U.S. 265 (1894) Warren v. Keep
Incore House Keeping (P) Ltd. vs Union of India
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-08-2022
THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 1333 OF 2017 PETITIONER/S: INCORE HOUSE KEEPING (P) LTD. REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, P.RAVEENDRAN, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.LATE K.PARAMESWARAN, RESIDING AT VELIPARAMBIL HOUSE, TRINITY APARTMENTS,
Keeping in View All the Circumstances but Without Meaning to Vs. State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-01-2013
given by the petitioner himself, the petitioner cannot be held responsible. I have carefully considered the aforesaid contentions. Keeping in view all the circumstances but without meaning to express any opinion on merits of the case, I
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“7. Keeping in View Ratio Decidendi of Abovesaid Rulings and in a Gi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-22-2013
of interim maintenance to them, through the medium of impugned judgment(Annexure P-2), which in substance is as under:-“7. Keeping in view ratio decidendi of abovesaid rulings and in a given set of facts as revisionists-petitioners have been
Would Keep the Matter Under Carpet Perpetually Without Vs. Harbans Sin ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
per the order of seniority. This does not mean that the State LPA No.689 of 2013(O&M) 2 would keep the matter under carpet perpetually without any effective relief to the aggrieved employees, on the pretext that no
“12. Keeping in View the Afore-stated Facts and Circumstances of the ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-04-2014
the indicated offences. by way of summoning order dated 03.05.2014 (Annexure P-3), which, in substance, is as under:-“12. Keeping in view the afore-stated facts and circumstances of the case as well as the law applicable thereto, this
Pink Housing Keeping vs.centre for Development of Telematics & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-25-2016
AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:28. 09.2016 Judgment delivered on:25. 10.2016 * % + W.P.(C) 7681/2016 PINK HOUSING KEEPING CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF TELEMATICS & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case:
The Kottayam District Time Keeping Association vs the District Collect ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-30-2021
JUSTICE T.R.RAVI WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2021 / 9TH ASHADHA, 1943 PETITIONER: THE KOTTAYAM DISTRICT TIME KEEPING ASSOCIATION REGISTER NO.K-1198/98, PALA UNIT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, C.J. JOSEPH, S/O JOHN, AGED 65 YEARS, VADAKKEPURATHU HOUSE,
M/S. Shriram Security and House Keeping vs the Deputy State Tax Office ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 26.02.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMYM/s.Shriram Security & House Keeping, Represented by its Proprietriz, Vijaya, W/o.Roopakanthan, Having its office at No.29/5, Thiru.Vi.Ka.Nagar, 6th Street, Puliyanthope, Perambur, Chennai -
“contends That Petitioner Is Ready to Keep the Vs. State of Punjab a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-10-2014
issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “Contends that petitioner is ready to keep the complainant and the minor child in the matrimonial home. On oral request of counsel for the petitioner,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free