Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 section 7 signals Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 15,575 results (0.195 seconds)

Jun 14 1948 (FN)

Lichter Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 251 u. s. 146 (local liquor traffic); central union trust co. v. garvan, 254 u. s. 554 (seizure of enemy property); hirabayashi v. united states, 320 u. s. 81 (curfew regulations); yakus v. united states, 321 u. s. 414 (emergency price control act); bowles v. willingham, 321 u. s. 503 (rent control), and korematsu v. united states, ..... of the excess profits tax." affidavit of robert p. patterson, under secretary of war, sworn to august 3, 1945. and see hensel and mcclung, profit limitation controls prior to the present war, 10 law & contemp.prob. 187 (1943-1944). [ footnote 11 ] the following significant congressional hearings were publicly held: hearings before ..... the raising and the support of the armed forces are essential. both require mobilization and control under the authority of congress. both are entitled also to such post-war relief as may be authorized by congress. the renegotiation act was developed as a major wartime policy of congress comparable to that of the selective .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1959 (HC)

K. Sethuramachar and anr. Vs. N.S. Hirannayya and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1960Kant90; AIR1960Mys90

..... he wants to put on the road if the permit is granted to him. he has referred us to rule 163 of the rules framed under the madras board traffic code, 1940, which is operative in the present by a person even after it is decided that the permit in question should be given to him.(6a) rule 163 ..... judgment in that case, abserved as follows:'further, as pointed out by mr. karanth, the notification published by the regional transport authority under s. 57(2) of the act, itself contained the particulars of the type and seating capacity of the vehicle which had to be used. it therefore became quite superfluous for the petitioner to state those particulars ..... shall contain the particulars mentioned therein and that an application, which does not contain those particulars, cannot be said to be an application for permit under the motor vehicles act. i have already referred to s. 46, as it stood prior to its amendment. the said section is clearly mandatory in its terms. it provides that the particulars .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 1962 (HC)

Gangadhar Gurusiddappa Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1963Mys193; ILR1962KAR527

..... in dispute and they may be briefly stated: the plaintiff who entered the services of the madras and southern mahratta railway was promoted to the post of deputy controller of trains in 1945 and v/as substantively holding the same on the material date. on 15th january 1950 the plaintiff absented himself from duty. the district ..... operating superintendent communicated these orders to the plaintiff by letter dated 3-1-1951. the plaintiff addressed a letter dated 7-1-1951 to the district transportation superintendent (traffic), hubli, stating that as he had been paid only rs. 160/- as his pay, it amounted to a compulsion on him to suffer the punishment imposed on ..... had proceeded under rule 148(3) and not under rule 1709 of the railway establishment code and that the provisions of section 240 of the government of india act did not come into operation. in view of this legal position we reject the contention advanced for the appellant.16. mr. krishnaswamy further submitted that even if .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1965 (HC)

M. Abdul Khader and anr. Vs. Mysore Revenue Appellate-tribunal, Bangal ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1967Kant6; AIR1967Mys6

..... of the original authority in respect of mailers enumerated thereunder. the said act did not provide for a second appeal. the act in question was not operative in the former stale of mysore. the mysore legislature passed the mysore motor vehicles and road traffic act. 1944 (act no. xxvii of 1944). which received the assent of his highness the ..... maharaja on the 5th day of august 1944. that enactment consolidated and amended the law relating to motor vehicles and road traffic in the then state of mysore. in pursuance of the ..... power granted by that enactment. rules were framed in 1945. but, after the republic of india, came into existence, the 'act' was extended to the former state of mysore in the year 1951 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1966 (HC)

Gyan Prakash Gupta Vs. State of Mysore by Its Chief Secretary Vidhana ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1968Kant61; AIR1968Mys61; ILR1967KAR64

sadasivayya, j.(1) these writ petitions are directed against the validity of part vi of the mysore rent control act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the act). part vi pertains to hotels and lodging-houses. it provides for the fixation of fair rates for board, lodging and other services given in hotels or ..... is the appropriate authority to consider whether such regulation by law is necessary. it is seen from the preamble portion of the act that the legislature has found it expedient, (amongst other things), to control rate of hotels and lodging houses. the provisions in part vi have been enacted with a view to regulate matters pertaining to ..... vesting in the government an arbitrary power offending article 14. while repelling that attack, the supreme court, at para 29 on page 275 stated as follows:-'...... the control......... is to be exercised for ensuring that the price fixed shall be reasonable having regard to the cost of production and the general level of prices prevailing of other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1973 (HC)

B. Basavalingappa and anr. Vs. V. Narasimhan

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1974CriLJ66; (1973)1MysLJ306

..... have been primarily and essentially enacted to protect such public servants. however, the protection also is extended to the facts of public servants where they may purport to act in the discharge of their duty to meet the administrative exigencies of the situation and may require such protection, even though departure from the normal course of official ..... embodied in this section seems to be well understood; the difficulty normally lies in its application to the facts of a given case. the question whether a particular act is defamatory is to be determined on the circumstances of each case.in another case namely, in amrik singh v. state of pepsu : 1955crilj865 this is what ..... sanction of the state government or the central government; and (3) that he is accused of any offence alleged to have been committed by him while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty. it is not disputed by sri k. subbannachar, the learned counsel for the respondent. that the first accused is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1978 (HC)

Muruli Touring Talkies and Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Etc.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1979Kant162

..... dealing with the contentions urged for the petitioners, it is necessary to set out the salient features of the karnataka cinemas (regulation) act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') and the rules. the act was enacted by the legislature for regulating exhibition by means of cinematographs and licensing places in which cinematograph films are ..... people gather. therefore, the public interest demands that sufficient provisions should be made for their safety seating accommodation, sanitation, protection against fire accident and against traffic hazards, every one of which is undoubtedly in public interest. the location of cinema house must also be such which should not have the effect of ..... unable to satisfy the requirements of the regulatory rules or provisions validly introduced ; but once it is conceded that regulation of the trade and its control are justified in the public interest, it would not be open to a person who fails to satisfy the rules or regulations to invoke his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 1979 (HC)

Bagalkot Udyog Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1979]43STC352(Kar)

..... to as the stc) as regulated under the cement control orders promulgated by the central government under section 18g of the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951, amounts to a sale as defined in section 2(t) of the karnataka sales act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the act), and consequently liable to sales tax under section ..... out of assessment proceedings in respect of sales of cement made by m/s. vishnu agencies in accordance with the provisions of the west bengal cement control act and the orders made thereunder to the allottees from time to time pursuant to the allotment order issued by the competent authority in the state of west ..... of allottees though made in accordance with the directions of the competent authority under the west bengal cement control act and the orders passed thereunder amounted to sales under section 2(g) of the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941, and, consequently, exigible to sales tax. the other case dhanyalakshmi rice mills v. commercial tax .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 1979 (HC)

V.G. Sumant Vs. Shailendra Kumar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1980MP101; 1979MPLJ785

..... , no such precautions enjoined by law were taken in respect of the said jeep. sections 81 and 84 occur in chap. vi of the motor vehicles act, 1939, pertaining to 'control of traffic' on a highway. this itself indicates that such necessary precautions relate to the use of a motor vehicle on a highway. there is no other reason for ..... view taken by the tribunal on this point.12. according to learned counsel appearing on both sides, the only reported decision directly on the point is general manager, karnataka state road transport corporation v. sangappa satalingappa goudar, air 1979 kant 10. that was a case in which the motor vehicle which had been stationed by the driver ..... its own weight and knocked down and injured a pedestrian. it was held that the driver's act amounted to contravention of section 50 of the road traffic act, 1930. for the same reason this case also supports the view taken by the karnataka high court with which we are in respectful agreement.14. some cases relied on by shri .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1980 (SC)

international Tourist Corporation and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1981SC774; (1981)2SCC318; [1981]2SCR364

..... goods along the national highway. apart from this, other faculties provided by the state government along all highways including national highways, such as lighting, traffic control, amenities for passengers, halting places for buses and trucks are available for use by everyone including those travelling along the national highways. it cannot therefore ..... from the states of gujarat, maharashtra, west bengal, punjab, haryana, karnataka, bihar, madhya pradesh, rajasthan, orissa, no other points were raised but the relevant provisions of the motor vehicles taxation acts and the taxation on passengers and goods acts in force in the several states were brought to our notice and similar ..... of the state government, while the maintenance of national highways is the responsibility of the union government, under section 5 of the national highways act, that very provision empowers the central government to direct that any function in relation to the development and maintenance of a national highway shall .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //