Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 section 7 signals Sorted by: old Court: privy council Page 1 of about 12 results (0.073 seconds)

Kally Dass Mookerjee Vs. the East Indian Railway Company

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1899)ILR26Cal465

..... of fire-works in the passenger compartment, these are matters peculiarly within the knowledge of the defendants themselves, who have the sole control of the traffic and alone know the methods by which that traffic is regulated. it is, therefore, in my opinion the duty of the defendants to produce the evidence on these matters to show ..... (530); and even apart from any question of crime, it is surely reasonable for every man to assume that his neighbour will not do an illegal act, and to act on that assumption.48. further, there is no statutory obligation on the railway company to put up notices warning passengers of the penalties for carrying dangerous goods ..... by law, and that in considering the question of omission on their part he has overlooked the fact that it is the amount of control possessed by the company over the act or acts complained of that determines their liability.88. these, in substance, represent the principal objections urged against the lower court's judgment. if i .....

Lakhichand Ramchand Vs. G.i.P. Railway Company

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1912)14BOMLR165

..... justice, and it is unnecessary to recapitulate them. it is enough to say that the appellants' goods were destroyed by fire while they were in the exclusive possession and control of the way company, and that the company have been unable to show from what cause the fire originated. admittedly the company have given all the evidence which it ..... at that depth. the first time this practice message was mentioned in connection with the case was in the answers to interrogatories on the 27th january 1910 when the deputy traffic manager deposed that he was informed by the station master-bhusawal that he received the first telegram from varangaum about 17 o'clock i. e. 5 p. m. ..... l.r. 8 c.p. 345.7. in my opinion this section does not increase the onus of proof laid upon the defendants by section 151 of the contract act.8. it is contended for the plaintiffs that the evidence establishes that the fire which destroyed the cotton originated in some preventable cause, that it could not have originated from .....

Emperor Vs. Ramchandra Hari

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1913)15BOMLR702; 20Ind.Cas.620

..... of hamals. the absence of the hamals and siding puts me into great difficulty about loading and unloading business so kindly arrange for a separate siding.'10. the district traffic superintendent deposes that there an a and b class stations, the distinction between the two classes being mainly with reference to fouling the line on which the in coming ..... borati and though running to kadabgaon on a marked incline where steam has to be shut off for the last three miles and the train would be under such control that it could be pulled up at the first danger signal the driver disregarded both danger signals and dashed into the derailed waggon causing some injury to two of ..... borati by disobeying general rule no. 99(c) and no. 100 of the general rules for all open lines of railways sanctioned under section 47 of the indian railways act of 1890 and published under notification no. 183, dated the 8th september 1906, by the governor general in council by giving permission to approach to 16 up at j .....

Abdul Latiff and Shaik HossaIn Vs. Pauling and Co. Ld.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1916Bom140; (1917)19BOMLR167

..... event, even if he had no license provided he drove carefully on this occasion, as i find he did, the mere absence of the license would not justify those acting under the defendants' control and orders from exercising any less care towards him than towards a driver who had a license. 11. the suit will proceed on the issue of damages. [the ..... high rate of speed. i consider that even if the defendants' evidence is to be believed it shows that the precautions which the engine driver, porter, etc., took to warn traffic along the road that the engine was about to cross the highway were quite inadequate. they knew the crossing was an open one and that the engine was invisible except ..... a white lamp and showed it. it is clear ho was actually on the crossing and not where he should have been, viz. some distance from it to warn approaching traffic.6. the effect of the evidence of the fireman and the oilman is the same. if believed it all comes to this that a porter stood on the crossing and .....

Attorney-general of Canada Vs. Attorney-general of Ontario and Others

Court : Privy Council

..... with the marking of aircraft ; annex b with certificates of air-worthiness ; annex c with log books ; annex d with lights, signals and rules for air traffic ; annex e with minimum qualifications necessary for obtaining certificates as pilots ; annex f with maps and ground markings ; annex g has eight parts dealing with meteorological ..... national aircraft, wherever it may be, to comply with the regulations contained in annex d, relative to the rules as to lights and signals and air traffic. 12. the obligation to prohibit the carriage by aircraft, in international navigation, of explosives and of arms and munitions of war; and to prohibit foreign ..... chancellor: this appeal raises an important question as between the dominion and the provinces of canada regarding the right to control and regulate aeronautics, including the granting of certificates to persons to act as pilots, the inspection and licensing of aircraft, and the inspection and licensing of aerodromes and air-stations. the question .....

Winnipeg Electric Co. Vs. Jacob Geel

Court : Privy Council

..... driver of the motor vehicle." reference was also made to s.15 which reads as follows : " every motor vehicle shall be equipped with adequate brakes sufficient to control such motor vehicle at all times and with a wind shield wiper and also with suitable bell, gong, horn, or other device which shall be sounded whenever it ..... in winnipeg, the respondent was sitting in the rear seat of an open touring car which was held up for the moment at a street-crossing by the traffic signals. while thus stationary the car was heavily run into from behind by the appellant's motor omnibus. the respondent sustained serious cerebral injuries as the result of ..... but mr. pritt has strenuously argued on various grounds that that plea should have succeeded. his contentions may be thus summarized: while admitting that s. 62 of the act places the burden on the appellants to disprove negligence, yet he contended, if there is no evidence of negligence apart from the statutory presumption, and the defendants adduce .....

The Surat Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Limited Vs. the Secretary ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1937)39BOMLR946

..... the proviso provides that the railway administration shall be bound to disclose to the consignor ' how the consignment was dealt with throughout the time it was in its possession or control, and, if necessary, to give evidence thereof, before the consignor is called upon to prove misconduct.' in their lordships' opinion, this obligation arises at once upon the ..... quoted :-(7) where did you last check seals, arrah. etc., and find them correct?(10) where was the joint police arrah passia as correct. at arrah and traffic check last made the policeman must have mis- of the seals of wagons on taken it for a non-seal wagon as. your train and with what there were a ..... the failure to submit the evidence of rohead, in the circumstances of this case, entitles the court to presume, in terms of section 114(g) of the indian evidence act, that rohead's evidence, if produced, would be unfavourable to the respondent, and that, in consequence, misconduct by complicity in the theft of some servant or servants .....

Surat Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills, Ltd. Vs. Secretary of State

Court : Privy Council

Reported in : AIR1937PC152

..... the proviso provides that the railway administration shall be bound to disclose to the consignor how the consignment was dealt with throughout the time it was in its possession or control, and, if necessary, to give evidence thereof, before the consignor is called upon to prove misconduct. in their lordships' opinion, this obligation arises at once upon the ..... . three of them may be quoted : (7) where did you last check seals, etc., and find them correct arrah. (10) where was the joint police and traffic check last made of the seals of wagons on your train and with what result ? arrah passia as correct. at arrah the policeman must have mistaken it for a non ..... opinion that the failure to submit the evidence of rohead in the circumstances of this case, entitles the court to presume, in terms of s. 114 (g), evidence act, that rohead's evidence, if produced, would be unfavourable to the respondent, and that, in consequence, misconduct by complicity in the theft of some servant or servants of .....

River Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. Vs. Owners and Parties Interested in S ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1939Cal513

..... the sarang on the 'tiktiki' there could be no objection to the arrangement and that orders could be given and carried out efficiently in this manner. the various controls within the pilot house or bridge are near one another as we saw on inspection of the vessel and there was no difficulty in one man operating on all of ..... river steam navigation co. have a common staff and common agents at all places outside calcutta. even at calcutta some of the staff is common. the claims department, the traffic department and various other departments are common. in fact the river service is run jointly by these two companies. the conduct of mr. killick at the time of the ..... master of the 'janardan' offended against article 21 of the rules promulgated by the government in. the exercise of the powers conferred by section 52, inland steam vessels act 1917 (act 1 of 1917).3. the definite case made out in the plaint is that the collision took place on the western portion of the fairway or channel and. before .....

Liversidge Vs. Sir John Anderson and Another

Court : House of Lords

..... shall find loitering in any highway whom he shall have good cause to suspect of having committed or being about to commit any felony mentioned in the acts. road traffic act, 1930, s. 28: a constable may arrest without warrant any person reasonably suspected of taking a motor vehicle without the owner's consent. can ..... your attention called to the evils of the exercise of arbitrary powers of arrest by the executive and the necessity of subjecting all such powers to judicial control. your lordships have been reminded of the great constitutional conflicts in the seventeenth century, which culminated in the famous constitutional charters, the petition of rights, ..... referred to are any organisation as respects which the secretary of state is satisfied that either the organisation is subject to foreign influence or control, or the persons in control of the organisation have or have had associations with persons concerned in the government of, or sympathies with the system of government of, any .....