Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 section 7 signals Page 1 of about 15,384 results (0.177 seconds)

Jul 21 1992 (HC)

Leena Fernandes Vs. Planning Authority

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1992KAR3068; 1992(3)KarLJ355

..... and 5': these petitioners 3 to 5 are sought to be evicted from their occupation in a petition presented on 12-10-1987 under the provisions of the karnataka rent control act and the proceedings are registered as hrc.no. 296/1987, which is pending. (here, it is necessary to note that, actually there are three eviction ..... every resident of the city has sufficient interest to question the unlawful construction of vast magnitude in the locality, which would contribute to the greater congestion and traffic in a particular area.48. in view of the glaring violation of the zonal regulations, the manifestly illegal orders of the state government and having regard ..... building is proposed to be put up is described in the writ petition as follows:'the hampankatta area is the busiest commercial area in mangalore with the heaviest traffic in the city. hampanakatta area comes within the outline development plan and the comprehensive development plan as an 'intensely developed area', of mangalore city. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2021 (HC)

D. S. Ramachandra Reddy Vs. The Commissioner Of Police

Court : Karnataka

..... ." thus, violation of the said regulations attracts penal provision under section 177a.12. we may also make a reference to the provisions of the karnataka traffic control act, 1960 (for short 'the said act of 1960'). section 8 thereof prohibits leaving a vehicle on a public place in such a manner that it will cause danger, obstruction or undue ..... will consider whether section 18 needs an amendment for providing for stringent punishments.13. the karnataka traffic control rules, 1979 (for short 'the said rules of 1979') have been framed in exercise of the powers under sections 14 and 16 of the said act of 1960. use of footpaths is provided in rule 6 which reads thus:"6. ..... '), the definition of 'street' includes any footway, subway or riding path or passage over which the public have a right of passage or access. even under the karnataka police act, 1963, clause 20 of section 2 defines 'street' which includes footways.-. 5 - 6. after considering the issue, this court in paragraphs 14 to 17 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 2020 (HC)

The Union Of India Vs. Bangalore North Taluk Public Greivances Committ ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the said decision is not applicable to the case on hand. 5170. the learned counsel for 1st plaintiff/1st respondent also relied on section 5 of the karnataka traffic control act, 1960 which reads as under: 5. main roads- the state government or any authority authorized in this behalf by the state government may by notification or by ..... and equipments they raised granite walls on either side of the disputed road. at that time, writ petitions were filed before the high court of karnataka, questioning the act of air force authorities 10 as it amounted to interference with the rights of the public. the proceedings in this connection reached the stage of appeal ..... 66. the suit is filed on 17.09.96 against: (1) union of india represented by its secretary, ministry of defence, new delhi -110001; (2) state of karnataka represented by its chief secretary, vidhana soudha, bangalore; (3) the air officer commanding, air force station, jalahalli, bangalore - 560 015.7. the defendant nos. 1 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 22 2021 (HC)

Smt. Jyothi Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... area for forming of new extensions or layouts or making new private streets in accordance with the karnataka town and country planning act, 1963; (s) subject to the provisions of the karnataka traffic control act, 1960, prohibiting vehicular traffic in any particular street, so as to prevent danger, obstruction or inconvenience to the public, ..... executive officer and further construction on the ground that the licence granted to the 4th respondent was contrary to rule 6 of the karnataka panchayat raj (gram panchayats control over erection of buildings) rules, 1994 ( the rules for short) and the said interim order is in operation as on ..... regulating the erection or use of buildings for private or commercial purposes subject to the karnataka town and country planning act, 1963; (q) regulating in any other particular not specifically provided for in this act, the construction, maintenance and control of drains, sewers, ventilation shafts, receptacles for dung and manure, cesspools, water closets .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 2017 (HC)

Anil S/O Vishwanath Manjanabail Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... rapid transport system (for short hdbrts ) was established by the karnataka state under the provisions of the companies act and to develop an eight lane road between these twin cities from unkal lake, hubballi to jubilee circle, dhrawad, to diffuse the severe traffic congestion and facilitate the rapid transport, the land in question was ..... acquired by the 8/36 date of judgment:19. 04.2017 wa nos.100221-25 of2017& connected cases anil s/o vishwanath manjanabail & others vs. the state of karnataka & anr. respondent-state under the provisions of karnataka state highways act, 1964 (for short the act ..... to them in this regard. however, a majority of land-losers have so taken their compensation under the consent awards passed under section 27 of the karnataka highways act, 1964.14. the second contention of the appellants-petitioners that the award deserves to be quashed, because it was not passed in terms of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2022 (SC)

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited Vs. Jsw Energy Limite ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... jindal thermal power company limited (hereinafter referred to as the first respondent). the appeal was filed by first respondent under section 41 of the karnataka electricity reforms act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the act for brevity).4. by the impugned order, the high court has set aside the order dated 22.05.2002 and the order dated 08. ..... be supplying power to our sister company's i.e., jvsl and jpiocl who are located adjacent to power plant and within a common's with yard (owned & controlled by jtpc). during this period since the power may not be available on 'firm' basis we would like to draw power from our banked power and supply to jvsl ..... be treated as an independent power producer and that the orders of the commission were afflicted with arbitrariness and error apparent. analysis the act the karnataka electricity reform act, 1999.39. section 1(3) provides that the act shall be deemed to have come into force w.e.f. the first day of june 1999. section 13 provided for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 03 2007 (HC)

R. Veeranna Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by Its Home Secretary a ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR4704

..... , the building laws applicable to other buildings are not applicable to the construction of a cinema theatre. the karnataka cinema (regulation) act is a self contained code, which takes care of environment, nuisance, traffic, hazards, parking places, the fire safety measures and engineering aspects of the building. the technical standards prescribed ..... 11 declares that the conflicting and inconsistent provisions in any other allied enactment is not made applicable for construction of a cinema theatre under karnataka cinema (regulation) act, 1954.5. sri u. abdul khader, learned counsel appearing for b.d.a. submitted that in the zonal regulations pertaining to commercial ..... give rigid interpretation to the expression 'semi public recreation' to exclude cinema theatre from its purview. it is to be seen that the karnataka cinema (regulation) act, permits construction of permanent cinema theatre in residential area. the zonal regulations also do not insist the change of land use for construction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 1981 (HC)

K. Mahadevappa and Etc. Etc. Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1982Kant113; ILR1981KAR1512; 1982(1)KarLJ28

..... are unable to hold that the motor vehicles tax, as levied in karnataka, imposes a pecuniary burden which goes beyond a proper recompense to the state for the benefits it provides for motor vehicular traffic in the shape of roads and bridges and control of traffic and other facilities. hence, we reject the contention of the petitioners that ..... per cent of the tax levied under s. 3.8. section 17a which was inserted by the motor vehicles taxation (amendment) act, 1976 provides for establishment of a fund called the karnataka roads and bridges fund to which the amount of surcharge collected under s, 3a, shall be transferred for the purpose of maintenance ..... for the developmental activities of the state in general, it is intended to mobilize resources by revising certain existing rates of taxes under the motor vehicles taxation act.'25. relying on the above statement of objects and reasons appended to the motor vehicles taxation (second amendment) bill, the petitioners contended that for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2000 (HC)

State of Karnataka Vs. Sadanand Parusharam Hosurkar

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : II(2000)ACC312; 2000CriLJ2426; 2000(2)KarLJ477

..... the centre of the road. this was the first breach of the law. secondly, what is pointed out to me is that under the provisions of the traffic control act though the original provision prohibited the carriage of more than one person on a bicycle, that by amendments carried out in the years 1986-87 to section ..... court has repeatedly issued directions to the traffic control department to enforce the lane system and stop zig-zagging on the roads but not even a little finger has been lifted. the home minister shall personally ..... been steadily increasing at the rate of about 11% per year, most of them being fatal, 870 deaths having taken place in the last two years. the traffic control department of the state government has been cheerfully watching the fun, happy that the population problem is automatically taking care of itself, which is absolutely unpardonable. this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1987 (HC)

L.R. Naik Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR2521

..... . for holding zilla parishad election, the state legislature alone is competent to enact law and for that purpose the act which is a complete code in itself has been enacted, moreover karnataka municipalities act, 1964, karnataka village panchayats and local boards act, 1959 and karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976, have been amended and similar provisions are made. proviso to explanation to sub-section (1) of section 11 ..... there is no constitutional compulsion on the state legislature to provide for reservation for the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in respect of election to a local body, the karnataka zilla parishads act provided for minimum 18% reservation for scheduled caste scheduled tribes in every mandal panchayat and every zilla parishad ; that apart, out of 25% seats reserved for women, one seat .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //