Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 section 7 signals Court: delhi Page 1 of about 801 results (0.302 seconds)

Tobu Enterpries Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Lt. Governor, Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1993IVAD(Delhi)609; 53(1994)DLT255; 1994(28)DRJ515; [1994(68)FLR615]; (1994)ILLJ1221Del

..... the state. in other words, the court said, they should be employees or officers of the state government, who were subject to the administrative and disciplinary control of the state government directly. the powers of search, seizure and detention of vehicles belonging to private parties and of launching prosecutions were incidental to the sovereign ..... judgment of the supreme court was not referred to before the full bench of the karnataka high court. (16) we are, thereforee of the view that under section 34 of the i.d. act the complaint for an offence under that act except section 30 could not have been filed by a private individual under the authority ..... are mentioned in the section. the state government issued a notification authorising the deputy general manager (traffic) and other officers of the state road transport corporation to discharge the power under section 129-a of the old act. the court said that the officers of the state road transport corporation could not be treated as .....

Rani Devi and ors Vs. D.T.C. and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... conductors who by their actions and inactions cause financial loss to the corporation ought not to be retained in service. in karnataka srtc vs. b.s. hullikatti (2001) 2 scc 574.it was held that misappropriation of funds to the tune ..... of `360.95 by the delinquent employee was found to be sufficient to impose punishment of termination from service. in divisional controller, ksrtc (nwkrtc) vs. a.t. mane (2005) 3 scc 254.the supreme court held thus, when a person ..... the respondents, were duly cross-examined by the workman. his closing statement was also taken separately. shri raj singh, traffic inspector has categorically stated that there were 21 passengers found travelling without ticket and they told that they had paid full ..... fair manner, inasmuch as principles of natural justice were violated. enquiry officer was subordinate to the competent authority and had acted mechanically with a biased mind. only interested witnesses were examined, who were not competent to depose about the incident. no .....

Rishikesh Balkishandas and Others Vs. I. D. Manchanda, Income-tax Offi ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1987]167ITR49(Delhi); [1987]34TAXMAN305(Delhi)

..... before the supreme court was 'whether it is obligatory upon the court which convicts a person for an offence under section 3(1) of the suppression of immoral traffic in women and girls act, 1956, to pass a sentence of imprisonment where the conviction is in respect of a first offence for a term of not less than one year and not ..... supreme court in state of karnataka v. pratap chand : 1981crilj595 , a person is liable to be convicted for an offence committed by the firm if he was in charge of, and responsible to, the firm for ..... be imposed on the firm.it was next contended that there were no evidence to prove that the partners of the firm, accused nos. 2 to 5, were in overall control of day to day business of the firm, accused no. 1, and in the absence of such evidence, no charge could be framed against those accused.as held by the .....

Rishikesh Balkishan Das and ors. Vs. I.D. Manchanda

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1987(1)Crimes374; ILR1986Delhi280

..... determination before the supreme court was 'whether it is obligatory upon the court which convicts a person for an offence under section 3(1) of the suppression of immoral traffic in women & girls act 1956 to toss a sentence of imprisonment where the conviction is, in respect of, a first offence for a term not less than one year and not merely ..... by the supreme court in state of karnataka vs . pratap chand & others, : 1981crilj595 (6) a person is liable to be convicted for an offence committed by the firm if he was in charge of and responsible to the ..... imposed on the firm. (20) it was next contended that there were no evidence to prove that the partners of the firm, accused no. 2 to 5, were in overall control of the day-to-day business of the firm, accused no. 1, and in the absence of such evidence no charge could be framed against those accused. (21) as held .....

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... distinction when dealing with the finer points of law. for example, a rent control act may be a special statue as compared to the code of civil procedure. but vis- -vis an act permitting eviction from public premises or some special class of buildings, the rent control act may be a general statute. in fact in damji valji shah v. lic ..... no.3071/2010 54 66. the complaint has been registered by the police under the provisions of the indian penal code as well as those of immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 (the 'it act'). it is necessary to examine the statutory spirit and intendment of that statute as well so as to answer the issue raised herein.67. the international ..... .r/w pronouncement of the division bench of this court in the case of krishna v. state of karnataka reported in ilr2000kar 2542 has overriding effect over section 6 of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000 or vice versa?. or which court/board has to deal with juvenile in respect of offences punishable .....

Shivam Chauhan & Anr. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... than 70,000 in the long term (2015). (emphasis supplied) 18. the above grave scenario was highlighted again in state of karnataka v. muralidhar (2009) 4 scc463 in alister anthony pareira v. state of maharashtra, (2012) 2 scc648taking note, inter alia, ..... india as indeed the devastating consequences flowing therefrom was brought out as under :-" 12. the editorial under the heading road traffic injuries & fatalities in india a modern epidemic in indian j.med. res. 123, january 2006 contains some interesting observations. ..... was driven at high speed in a rash or negligent manner over mahipalpur flyover. the motorcycle went out of control of the first petitioner (rider) and slipped on the road resulting in all the three persons travelling thereon falling ..... to quash where the offender is involved in an activity akin to a financial or misdemeanour. the consequences of the act complained of upon financial or economic system will weigh in the balance . economic the or fraud (emphasis supplied) .....

Jitender Kumar and Another Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary Do ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... allowed and the orders of the high court, affirming the directions issued by the tribunal, are set aside. no costs. in surya kant kadam v. state of karnataka and ors (jt 2001 (3) sc 485), it was again countenanced that appointment on compassionate ground is not governed by any statutory rules but set of administrative instruction ..... word state in article 12 is an enlarged definition within which all local or other authorities within the territory of india as well as the authorities under the control of government of india stands included. but the word state in part xiv only means the states specified in first scheduled of the constitution. 5. besides ..... appointment on compassionate ground. 4. in order to determine the first proposition it may be pertinent to refer to article 309 of the constitution subject to which acts of the appropriate legislature may regulate the recruitment and conditions of services of persons appointed to public services and posts in connection with the affairs of the .....

Priyanka Gogna Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 109(2004)DLT456

..... was quashed. however, the infraction of a mandatory stipulation, as that of the mci, was not in question. for this very reason the decisions in rajendra prasad mathur v. karnataka university, : [1986]2scr912 , ashok chand singhvi v. university of jodhpur, : [1989]1scr230 , km. maxey charan v. rohilkhand university, bareilly and anr., : air1992all122 , ..... stated by this court to be the repository of the power to prescribe standards in postgraduate studies subjects, of course, to the control of the central government as envisaged in the act constituting the council.' the court struck down the selecting of students who had secured marks less than the minimum prescribed by the ..... in contradistinction to candidates enjoying a constitutional reservation.'5. in medical council of india v. state of karnataka and ors., vi : [1998]3scr740 , the hon'ble supreme court had opined that the 'indian medical council act is relatable to entry 66 of list i (union list). it prevails over any state enactment to .....

P.C. JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT326

..... w.e.f 11.10.1982. the said definition was amended to attain its present form by substitution of the expression 'service tax' in place of 'gold (control)' by act 32 of 2003 by section 135 w.e.f. 14.05.2003. similarly, the definition of appellate tribunal as contained in section 65(5) was part of ..... high court in the case of jaswant kaur (supra) which was upheld by the supreme court in the case of h.s. srinivasa raghavachar and ors. v. state of karnataka and ors. : [1987]2scr1189 in so far as issue with regard to prohibition on legal practitioners appearing in various proceedings before land tribunals was concerned. justice o. chinappa ..... case of jaswant kaur (supra) and struck down a similar provision, that is, section 48(8) of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 which barred legal practitioners from appearing before the land tribunals, functioning under the karnataka land reforms act, 961.26. in our view, the two cases cited by the petitioners are clearly distinguishable. in both the cases .....

Ramesh Chandra Singh vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... it is plain that the ig did not keep the said policy in mind when he entered the adverse remarks.12. in m.a.rajasekhar v. state of karnataka and another (1996) 10 scc369 the supreme court noted that there had been an assessment of the officer on various parameters on which he was found to have satisfactory ..... down in the pen picture regarding the work of the... petitioner: a well built, disciplined and sincere officer. he took interest to complete the assigned tasks. his command & control over the troops is very good. he ensured domination of border. he looked after welfare of troops. during the period his overall performance was very good .3. however, when ..... conduct. the remark that the officer does not act dispassionately when faced with dilemma was required to be pointed out with specific reference to instances when he did not perform that duty satisfactorily so that he would .....