Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Page 15 of about 9,649 results (0.161 seconds)

State of Karnataka Vs. Dundamada Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR2605; 1994(3)KarLJ378

..... such patta holders before excavating minerals for themselves should also follow the gamut of rule 3a was totally unauthorised.14. on the aspect of vires of the karnataka ordinance and karnataka act, it was submitted by sri shanthi bhushan, the learned senior counsel for some of the petitioners and which submissions were adopted by the learned counsel of ..... mining operations, includes a sub-lease granted for such purpose. it therefore, becomes clear that section 4 sub-section (1) refers to any person and seeks to control the mining operations in any area, which may include patta lands by such persons who are outsider lessees. mining lease necessarily pre-supposes a lessor and a lessee. ..... union list is found entry 54 to the following effect:'54. regulation of mines and mineral development to the extent to which such regulation and development under the control of union is declared by parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest.'in list ii, that is, the state list is found entry 23 .....

Chikkusappa Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(3)KarLJ64

..... issue of mineral dispatch permits under rule 42, the competent authority on being apprised by another statutory authority of the government functionary under the act (karnataka land revenue act) has brought to the notice of the competent authority that persons who apply for issue of mineral dispatch permits if are required to ensure ..... contented by the learned advocate general that diverting agricultural land to non-agricultural use would attract the provisions of sections 95 and 96 of the karnataka land revenue act, and therefore it should be possible for the state government to exercise the necessary authority under those provisions to bring to book all private ..... the provisions of karnataka minor mineral concession rules, 1969, there is no requirement on the part of the petitioners to obtain any transit permit from anybody for transporting the extracted mineral, except to the extent of movement of the vehicle itself and its goods, being controlled by the motor vehicles act, 1988'. the .....

Karnataka Rajya Kaigarika, Sahakara Bank Niyamita and anr. Vs. V. Kris ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2012(3)KCCR2092

..... and it provides among other things, a recovery process in respect of a claim of the society for any debt due to it under section 70(2) of the karnataka co-operative societies act. it is a speedy remedy available to the co-operative societies. therefore, the cooperative societies/banks cannot be the subject matter of the central legislation and they cannot ..... , repayable on demand or otherwise for lending or investment and also to control other forms of businesses which a banking company may engage, is set out in the act. section 3 of the act which was substituted by act 23 of 1965 which came into effect from 01.03.1966 made this act applicable to co-operative societies in certain cases. section 3 makes it .....

Kushal S/O Bapurao Pawar Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through the Assi ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(6)BomCR28; 2008(6)MhLj914

..... also it is not possible to interprete that marginal notes / headings indicated a reservation in favour of non borrower and creation of such separate constituency and control of voting right of borrower and non borrower to their category.it would be also appropriate to refer to the constitution bench judgment of the supreme court ..... circumstances, the legislature in its wisdom does not provide for a separate constituency for borrower members or non borrower members under the scheme of the parent act i.e. act of 1960.13. district central cooperative bank is referred in section 73-c(1). from the said provision, it is clear that individual members ..... in his opinion, literal meaning does not justify any inference of legislative intend to constitute any constituency of non borrowing members. he further submitted that scheme of the act of 1960 favours the proposition ' all for each and each for all'. save and except the restrictions which are imposed, to relative number of representations. all .....

A.J. Patel and ors. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1965Guj234a

..... runs as under: 115. (1) every person who immediately before the appointed day serving in connection with the affairs of the union of india the administrative control of lieutenant governor or chief commissioner in any of the existing states of ajmer, bhopal, coorg, kutch and vindhya pradesh, or is serving in connection with the ..... ;--309 of the constitution and in accordance with the decisions of the government of india under the provisions of section 115(5) of the states reorganization act, 1956 (central act 37 of 1956), the government of (name of state) is pleased to publish the final gradation list of the (name) establishment/department shall be ..... , of officers affected had been decided in consultation with the central advisory committee /state advisory committee as envisaged under section 115(5) of the states reorganisation act,1956;and(d) that the above mentioned decisions have been correctly incorporated in the final common gradation lists. (ii) the state government will prefix to the .....

The Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Limited Through Its Chief Offic ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(4)BomCR719

..... considered to be followed as ratio laid down. in the matter of 'mohan kamlakar v. joshi metal industries, bijapur, reported at 1999 l.i.c. 222', the karnataka high court held that claim of workmen has to be given priority over dues under award in favour of bank. in the reported case, bank had obtained an award ..... goods, by the government and by making money available to other creditors of the pawnor without the claim of the pawnee being first fully satisfied. in karnataka pawn brokers association v. state of karnataka : air1999sc201 , it was held; pawnbroker has special property rights in the goods pledged, a right higher than a mere right of detention of goods ..... to be repelled by learned senior counsel for the newly appointed board of liquidators and by learned government pleader, by stating that by virtue of mcs act, the state has pervasive control over the affairs of the sick sugar factory, because by assisting the sugar factory financially, being a cooperative factory, the state has a .....

Medical Council of India Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC2423; JT1998(5)SC40; 1998(4)SCALE161; (1998)6SCC131; [1998]3SCR740

..... kamataka, the division bench in its impugned judgment partly allowed the same.32. the state acts, namely, karnataka universities act and karnataka capitation fee act must give way to the central act, namely, the indian medical council act, 1956. karnataka capitation fee act was enacted for the sole purpose of regulation in collection of capitation fee by colleges and ..... is the power to prevent what would make co-ordination impossible or difficult. the power is absolute and unconditional, and in the absence of any controlling reasons it must be given full effect according to its plain and expressed intention.'18. mr. dave appearing for the medical council submitted that this ..... t.p. roshana and anr., : [1979]2scr974 where the court said as under :-'the indian medical council act, 1956 has constituted the medical council of india as an expert body to control the minimum standards of medical education and to regulate their observance. obviously, this high-powered council has power to prescribe .....

The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority and anr. Vs. State o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR318; 2006(1)KarLJ1

..... incorporating parts ix and lx.-a and the consequential amendments carried out by the state legislature in the karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976, karnataka municipalities act, 1964, karnataka panchayat raj act, 1993, the provisions of the bangalore development authority act, 1976, in particular section 2(c) defining bangalore metropolitan area; and section 15 dealing with ..... conformity with sub-sections (3) and (4) thereof and whether there is violation of other statutes such as klr act, karnataka municipalities act, 1964, karnataka municipal corporations act, 1976, karnataka town and country planning act, 1961 etc.?15. can the private builders proceed with their projects on the basis of conversion orders, without any ..... was deleted. therefore, it was held persons affordable will buy any number of sites and have monopoly over the same and bda has no control over the allottees of the sites and that would defeat the very purpose of the rules. in a writ petition filed for challenging the .....

S. Vasudeva Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC923; (1994)2GLR949; JT1993(2)SC465; (1993)2MLJ140(SC); 1993(2)SCALE244; [1993]2SCR715

..... favour of the builders as void and inoperative; (d) for directing the state government to take action under section 6 of the karnataka parks, play-fields, and open space [reservation and regulation] act, 1985 and for other relief.11. the learned single judge by his judgment and order dated 8.9.1989 allowed the writ ..... increasing urbanisation, a need for orderly development of urban areas has also been felt. it is, therefore, considered necessary to take measures for exercising social control over the scarce resource of urban land with a view to ensuring its equitable distribution amongst the various sections of society and also avoiding speculative transactions relating ..... the application had mentioned among other things, as follows :[a] due to lot of competition and nationalisation of the black and pink granites by southern states including karnataka, the firm had been suffering losses in the abovesaid business; [b] the partners of this firm are the partners of a firm known as 'woodlands' .....

State of Karnataka, rep. by its Chief Secretary and Others Vs. Jagadev ...

Court : Karnataka

..... v.r.pattabiraman [(1985) 1 scc 591], the hon ble supreme court was considering explanation to proviso to section 10(2) of t.n.buildings (lease and rent control) act, 1960. after referring to several works of jurists on interpretation of statutes and decisions of this court, at para 53, it has been summarized as under: 53. ..... than twelve months and that it was neither compulsory nor obligatory on the part of the petitioner therein to register the vehicle in the state of karnataka under section 47 of mv act, 1988. that the vehicle had already been registered in the state of goa and lifetime tax had been paid thereon and therefore, the petitioner ..... 2014 after receiving assent of the governor on 28/02/2014, which reads as under: 2. amendment of section 3:- in the karnataka motor vehicles taxation act, 1957 (karnataka act 35 of 1957) (hereinafter referred to as the principal act), in section 3, in sub section (1), in the fourth proviso,- (iii) the explanation shall be renumbered as explanation - .....