Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 5 of about 394 results (0.180 seconds)

V.D.S.R.Re.Rolling Mill. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

..... of respondent 3 and 4. thus the respondents 3 and 4 became tenants. they filed an application in form-7 under section 48-a of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, for registering them as occupants thereof, and that the land tribunal concerned having held an enquiry, granted occupancy rights in their favour, as prayed ..... 39. certain principles of policy to be followed by the state. the state shall, in particular, direct its policy towards securing (b) that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good. 46. promotion of educational and economic interests of scheduled castes, ..... as follows: "article 39(b) of the constitution of india envisages that the state shall in particular direct its policy towards securing that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the common good. admittedly, scheduled castes and scheduled tribes are the weaker sections .....

Jeevanlal (1929) Limited and ors. Vs. Controlling Authority Under the ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1982)ILLJ86Mad

..... similar to those carried on in its madras factory. on an application under s. 7 of the act, made by a workman employed in the factory at bangalore, the controlling authority and the appellate authority appointed by the state government of karnataka took the view that the appropriate government was the state government and not the central government and hence ..... various grounds, one of them being that the firm had employed, only seven persons and hence the act would not apply to it. the application was posted for hearing at 2 p.m. on 24-4-1978, but on account of traffic bottle-necks and a tyre-puncture of his vehicle, the partner of the petitioner could reach the office ..... of the controlling authority only by above 2-30 p.m. by then, the controlling authority had recorded ex parte evidence and passed an ex parte order. hence he .....

Chennai Textile Chemicals Private Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2002]125STC107(Mad)

..... discrimination against particular persons or classes. [see : east india tobacco company v. state of andhra pradesh : [1963]1scr404 ], p.m. ashwathanarayana setty v. state of karnataka 1989 supp (1) scc 696, federation of hotel & restaurant association of india v. union of india , kerala hotel & restaurant association v. state of kerala : ..... in their lordships' view the queensland legislature were fully warranted in legislating in the terms of the transport acts now being considered. they preserved their own capacity intact and they retained perfect control over the commissioner for transport inasmuch as they could at any time repeal the legislation and withdraw such ..... those that are grouped together from others ; and (ii) the differentia must have a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the act. it is not the requirement that the classification should be scientifically perfect or logically complete. classification would be justified if it is not palpably arbitrary. .....

Consumer Action Group Rep. by Its Trustee Tara Murali Vs. the State of ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(4)CTC483

..... by the supreme court, the exemption clause may properly apply only to excessive and genuine hardship and not to exempt the violators from the application and control of the act thereby allowing them a free hand to violate the rules which are enacted in the interest of the community and for the orderly development of the ..... with wrongful gains to the violators of the law at the cost of the public, and instead of development bring back cities into the hazards of pollution, disorderly traffic, security risks, etc. such a pattern retards development, jeopardises all purposeful plans of any city, and liquidates the expenditure incurred in such development process.38. ..... of the city at large. such wayward growth in illegal constructions has posed a serious threat to ecology and environment and affected water supply, sewerage and traffic movement facilities in the city. the violations of regulatory rules on such massive scale can result in development plan becoming merely a scrap of paper. on the .....

Kothari Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR1115]; (1996)ILLJ394Mad

..... court in (1960-i-llj-244) : : (1960)illj244sc , held that object of section 34(l) of the i.d. act and that of clause 23 of the cotton cloth & yarn (control) order was similar namely the prevention of frivolous or harassing prosecution or of prosecutions which on grounds of policy should not be instituted and that ..... litigation with the petitioners.4. the fact that mr. g.velayutham is the public relation officer of kothari industrial corporation limited, a company which is under the control of p.d. kothari is not in dispute. according to the petitioners, the petitioner companies as also kothari industrial corporation limited and other companies belonged originally ..... v. the binny ltd. staff association (1988-i-llj-405) : : (1988)illj405kant a full bench of the karnataka high court considered the question as to who could file a complaint under section 34 of the act and whether a private individual securing permission from the government can file a complaint. the court therein held that the .....

Mayavaram Financial Corporation Ltd. and ors. Vs. Reserve Bank of Indi ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1971]41CompCas890(Mad)

..... him to inspect the books, registers, accounts or documents, etc. 5. deposits received from investing public, it will be seen, are outside the control of the madras chit funds act, 1961. it is with a view to safeguard the interests of the depositors that parliament made the impugned enactment, namely, the banking laws (miscellaneous ..... 4) even if the impugned provisions are valid, the directions issued are invalid. (5) there is no need to control the activities of the foreman of chit, in view of the madras chit funds act, 1961. (6) the government in their supplemental counter-affidavit did not categorically specify the entry under which the impugned enactment ..... activity of the petitioners in receiving deposits from third parties amount to normal banking activities which parliament is entitled to regulate and control. 38. in dealing with this contention mr. chari refers to the madras money-lenders act, 1937 (xx vi of 1937), where 'loan' and ' money-lender ' have been defined under sections 2(6 .....

Union Bank of India and Ors. Vs. Additional Commissioner for Workmen's ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1984)ILLJ456Mad

..... railway administration operatingany railway as defined in clause4. pondicherry shops and 20 of art. 366 of the constitutionestablishments act - and cantonment authorities.section 5(1)(b)5. karnataka shops and nothing in this act shall apply toestablishments act - 'offices of or under the centralsection 3(1)(a) and state governments or localauthorities except commercialundertakings.6 ..... the establishment cannot be viewed as an establishment under the state government within the meaning of s. 4(1)(c) of the act. that the board was under the control of the state government did not make the employees, employees of the government, nor did it make the establishment consisting of clerical employees ..... legal contrivance of a corporation because it has many practical advantages and at the same time does not involve the slightest diminution in its ownership and control of the undertaking. in such cases 'the true owner is the state, the real operator is the state and the effective controllorate is the .....

itc Limited Rep. by Its Constituted Attorney, Subhatosh Banerjee Vs. t ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(2)CTC577; (2007)5MLJ897; (2007)7VST367(Mad)

..... the type which is now before us.39. in the case of andhra steel corporation v. commr. of commercial taxes , a provision in section 5(4) of the karnataka sales tax act which granted exemption to sale of finished goods manufactured out of locally produced raw material while denying it to the sale of finished goods manufactured out of imported raw ..... hyderabad : air1997sc4067 the case of the appellant was that the oil had been extracted out of groundnuts which had borne tax under the karnataka sales tax act. the levy of tax on the oil imported from karnataka into andhra pradesh at a rate higher than the rate at which the oil manufactured in andhra pradesh is taxed is discriminatory and violative of ..... compensatory tax by the constitution bench in jindal's case which read as follows: (scc pp.268 & 269)45. to sum up, the basis of every levy is the controlling factor. in the case of 'a tax', the levy is a part of common burden based on the principle of ability or capacity to pay. in the case of 'a .....

Workmen of Kempt (1) Ltd. (Represented by Kempt Employees Union, Throu ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1993)IIILLJ913Mad

..... the judicial power''.11. again in liberty oil mills v. union of india : [1984]3scr676 , while dealing with clause 8b of the imports and exports (control) act, which does not provide for a pre-decisional opportunity to the affected party and also lays down that an order may be made 'without as signing any reason ..... order would be violative of the principles of natural justice and unsustainable. 19. in theatre sanjaya v. state of karnataka : (1984)iillj400kant wherein again the question before the full bench of the karnataka high court was, whether the principles of audi alteram partem were applicable when the government having declined to make a reference ..... of an industrial dispute under section 10(1) of the act for adjudication, proposes to refer such a dispute for adjudication .....

Manian Transports and Others Vs. S. Krishna Moorthy, Income-tax Office ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1991]191ITR1(Mad)

..... were imprisonment was compulsory. the apex court, was deciding the interpretation of the word 'punishable' used in section 3(1) of the suppression of immoral traffic in women and girls act, 1956, contra distinguished from the word 'punished' used by the legislature in certain penal provisions. the high court of bombay took the view that the ..... year compulsory for such offence in addition to fine, unless for special reasons a sentence of imprisonment for a lesser period was warranted directed the high court of karnataka to pass an appropriate sentence. while so, it will be significant to notice the following observations of the supreme court (at page 812) : 'of ..... sentence of fine need not carry with it any direction of imprisonment in default was before the supreme court when it considered the judgment of the karnataka high court in state of karnataka v. rajasthan pharmaceutical laboratory [1975] mlj (cr.) 331, and reversed it, on a limited issue. the observations of the supreme court that .....