Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 2 of about 394 results (0.506 seconds)

Bharathidasan University, Represented by Its Registrar-in-charge and o ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2005Mad377; 2005(2)CTC182

..... a no-objection certificate from the state government, the application would be treated as incomplete and would not be considered. the appellant unsuccessfully challenged before the karnataka high court the vires of regulations 5(e) and (f) of the national council for teacher education regulations, 1995 in so far as they ..... power in respect of education with reference to various entries in list provided in the constitution and after considering the medical university act-state act and the indian medical council act (central act), concluded thus: (para 31)'para 31, it would thus appear that in section 10a parliament has made a complete and exhaustive ..... education falls within the purview of the national council for teacher education constituted under the national council for teacher education act, 1993 (act 73/1993) ('ncte act' in short). as per the ncte act and the national council for teacher education regulations, 2002, if a management or institution desired to establish a teacher training .....

Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... community. the last part of the first paragraph of the statement of objects and reasons shows that the opportunity of amending the act was availed of to incorporate certain provisions on the other aspects of effective control on the manufacture, distribution, sale of drugs and cosmetics, on the basis of experience gained in the working of the ..... act. paragraph 2(3) of the statement of objects and reasons, which dealt with clauses 8 and 21 of the proposed bill, indicated ..... functions assigned to it by this act".18. the advisory board is to comprise of a total of about 18 members. sub-section (2) of section 5 indicates the constitution of the board as follows:-"(i) the director general of health services, ex officio, who shall be chairman;(ii) the drugs controller, india, ex officio;(iii) .....

Uti Bank Ltd. Vs. the Dy. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai Ii D ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(115)ECC323; 2007LC323(Madras); [2007(2)JCR13(Mad)]; 2007[6]STR82; AIR2007Mad118(FB); 2007(1)LW50

..... [1995]212itr428(sc) . three judge bench], madhya pradesh general sales tax in state of m.p. v. state bank of indore : (2002)10scc441 . three judge bench], and karnataka sales tax act in dena bank v. bhikhabhai prabhudas parekh & co. : [2001]247itr165(sc) . as explained in the case of constitution bench judgment in builders supply corporation v. union of india ..... an authorisation by a commissioner of customs and in accordance with the rules made in this behalf, distrain any movable or immovable property belonging to or under the control of such person, and detain the same until the amount payable is paid; and in case, any part of the said amount payable or of the cost ..... or may require any other officer of customs to recover the amount so payable by detaining and selling any goods belonging to such person which are under the control of the [assistant commissioner of customs or deputy commissioner of customs] or such other officer of customs; or[(c) if the amount cannot be recovered from such .....

Khoday Distilleries Limited, a Company Incorporated Under the Companie ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : LC2007(3)409; 2008(36)PTC315(Mad)

..... whisky.(vii) learned senior counsel for the appellant further submitted that under section 11 of the customs act, imports of goods is prohibited except with the permission upon import license given under the imports and exports control act, 1947; the distribution and sale of such liquor are restricted only to five star hotels and tourism ..... scot as scotch whisky; the lable and the carton clearly indicate then it is a product of india distilled, blended and bottled in india in bangalore, karnataka state as required by law; this satisfies the requirements of the trade marks rules part ii schedule 4 item 43; there is, no likelihood of any ..... . v. the life insurance corporation of india and ors. : (1969)iillj711sc and sushila devi v. ramanandan prasad : [1976]2scr845 that the provisions of the limitation act, 1963 apply only to proceedings in 'courts' and not to appeals or applications before bodies other than courts such as quasi-judicial tribunals or executive authorities, notwithstanding the .....

M/S. Thiru Muruga Finance Rep. by Its Partner Sri V. Thirunavukkarasu, ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2000(2)CTC609

..... a failure in returning the amount by the financial establishment. section 2 sub-clause (3) does not include companies registered under the companies act or statutory corporation, cooperative societies owned or controlled by any state government or the central government, or a banking company as defined under section 5(c) of the banking regulation ..... deposits under any scheme or arrangement or in any other manner but does not include a company registered under the companies act, 1956 or a corporation or a co-operative society owned or controlled by any state government or the central government, or a banking company as defined under section 5(c) of the ..... default in repayment of deposits and interest. the said section comes under chapter iii of the act. chapter ii as discussed earlier, speaks about attachment of properties on default of return of deposits and competent authority to exercise control over the properties attached by the government under section 3. it opens with a non-absentee .....

Selvi J. Jayalalitha, Vs. the Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by Its Secret ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2007]288ITR225(Mad)

..... tax evaders and that it was intended to incorporate certain provisions in the direct tax laws, similar to those which already existed in the customs act and the gold (control) act. the intention of the government was announced by the long term fiscal policy to amend the direct tax laws providing similar provisions so that ..... of m.p. v. mohanlal soni] : 2004crilj1221 [asst. commissioner v. velliappa textiles ltd.]2005 a.i.r. s.c.w. 1684 [c.s. krishnamurthy v. state of karnataka] : [1977]1scr763 [narayan govind gavate v. state of maharashtra]1999 crl. l.j. 4190 [pentapati venkata satyanarayana murthy v. state of a.p.] : 1996crilj4147 [devchand kalyan tandel ..... m.s. dhowani v. j. ranganathan] : 2000crilj746 [kanti bhadra shah v. state of west bengal]2005 a.i.r. s.c.w. 1684 [c.s. krishnamurthy v. state of karnataka] : [1991]2scr802 [tribhovandas haribhai tamboli v. gujarat]1989 (179) i.t.r. 558 [geethanjali mills ltd. v. v. thiruvengadathan] : [1998]234itr261(mp) [laxmandas pranchand v. union .....

The Secretary, Kamaraj College Vs. D.S. Arulmani, Reader and Head of D ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ593

..... said case, the supreme court considered the effect of the presidential assent to the bombay rents, hotel and lodging houses rates control act, 1947, on the parliamentary enactment, viz., the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act, 1971. by a majority, the apex court held (in paragraph no. 65) that article 254(2) of the ..... are necessary for the proper maintenance of standards of education and to check maladministration. it is stated in t.m.a. pai foundation v. state of karnataka : air2003sc355 that:71. while giving aid to professional institutions, it would be permissible for the authority giving aid to prescribe by rules or regulations, the ..... therefore be reversed on this point unhesitatingly.again in medical council of india v. state of karnataka and ors. : [1998]3scr740 , it was held as follows:24. ...regulations framed under section 33 of the medical council act with the previous sanction of the central government are statutory. these regulations are framed to carry .....

C.V. Karunakaran Vs. the Chairman, Central Board of Excise and Customs ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2009(171)LC254(Madras); 2010(249)ELT324(Mad)

..... offences under the act;(o) the provisions of allied acts including imports and exports (control) act, 1947 (18 of 1947), foreign exchange regulation act, 1973 (46 of 1973), indian explosives act, 1884 (4 of 1884), arms act, 1959 (54 of 1959), opium act, 1978 (1 of 1878), drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 (23 of 1940) destructive insects and pests act, 1914 (2 ..... of 1914), dangerous drugs act, 1930 ( ..... words, dcr have statutory force. it is also a settled position of law that there could be no 'promissory estoppel' against a statute. (a.p. pollution control board ii v. prof. m.v. nayudu, scc para 69, sto v. shree durga oil mills, scc paras 21 and 22 and sharma transport v. govt .....

Trichy Engineering College, Rep. by Dr. M. Sekar, Public Relations Off ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004(5)CTC572

..... have yet been formulated in terms of section 5(a)(c)of the act.(v) chapter viii-a of the act deals with the manner of control over colleges which were earlier affiliated to the other universities and are deemed to be affiliated to anna university as ..... affiliated to annamalai university) were brought into the fold of anna university. all the provisions of the respective acts under which those other universities had control over the colleges and institutions to which anna university act would be applicable (engineering and technical institutions) would cease to apply.20. under section 38-a(3), it ..... promotion and higher emoluments.(iv) reference was made to the various provisions under the anna university act, 1978, in support of the contention that the university can act only in terms of their own regulations and its control over the constituent colleges can be exercised only in terns of those regulations. admittedly, no regulations .....

P. Gopirathnam and 4 Others Vs. Ferrodous Estate (Pvt.) Ltd., Rep. by ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(2)CTC181

..... no application to the facts of the present case as this is not a sale in execution of a decree for money. 25. the principle laid down by the karnataka high court was relied on by allahabad high court in pratap narain agrawal v. bam narain, 1981 all. l. j.591. on the facts of the case ..... performance of contract itself being discretionary. apart from the sale, when a transaction is only after obtaining exemption or permission from another authority, over which court has no control, the relief of specific performance usually is not granted. while giving such direction, it will be going beyond contract and if ultimately exemption is refused, in effect, ..... the ground that contract is not enforceable at the instance of party. section 20 deals with discretionary powers of the court. it is while exercising discretion, the act says that vendor cannot contend that the contract cannot be enforceable. when there is no question of exercising discretion and when the transaction is prohibited, section 20(4 .....