Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 36 of about 394 results (0.097 seconds)

Maharaja of Kolhapur Vs. S. Sundaram Ayyar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1925Mad497

..... of the other widows. the g.c. then proceeds to declare:the estate will therefore be made over to the senior widow who will have the management and control of the property, and it will be her duty to provide in a suitable manner for the participative enjoyment of the estate in question by the other widows - ..... however, interprets the consequenee of this dependence in a different way, and the conclusion of the leading commentators of the bombay school is that, adoption being a meritorious act, express permission is not necessary. i may in this connexion refer to the translations of the passages in viramitrodaya and the kaustubha by mandlik on pages 463 to 467 ..... speak of themselves in official documents and petitions and legal proceedings in which they ware parties. evidence of this kind is conduct admissible under section 50 of the evidence act [see illustration] (b), as it shows the repute in which sword marriage was held in this family. in a manuscript obtained from the oriental library in .....

Maharaja of Kolhapur Vs. S. Sundaram Ayyar and 15 ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1925)ILR68Mad1

..... properties which she took possession of and took steps for the purpose. she maintained that her co-widows had no interest in the property or any right to control its management and she did not make provision for their maintenance. owing to disputes between the parties, two out of the 15 ranis then surviving filed o.s ..... , interprets the consequence of this dependance in a different way, and the conclusion of the leading commentators of the bombay school is that, adoption being a meritorious act, express permission is not necessary. i may in this connexion refer to the translations of the passages in viramitrodaya arid the kaustubha by mandlik in pages 463 to ..... other south indian deities, they preserved many of their own habits, like sunmuk, which are peculiar to the mahrattas. there is evidence that the telugu purohit was acting under the supervision of the western purohit named bhat goswami (see the evidence of d.w. 91). the mere employment of local priests under the supervision of family .....

Metal Weld Electronics Vs. Cest Tax Appellate Tribunal

Court : Chennai

..... this chapter, the decision or order appealed against relates to any duty demanded in respect of goods which are not under the control of central excise authorities or any penalty levied under this act, the person desirous of appealing against such decision or order shall, pending the appeal, deposit with the adjudicating authority the duty ..... the tribunal to decide these appeals expeditiously." iv.in commissioner of central excise v. hml agencies (p) ltd., 2012 tiol 298 a division bench of the karnataka high court comprising n.kumar and ravi malimath, jj.dismissed on merits a writ petition filed by the commissioner of central excise challenging an order passed by the ..... case of commissioner of central excise v. hml agencies (p) ltd., supra, the revenue itself has filed a writ petition against the interlocutory orders before the karnataka high court. this only adds credence to the issue raised herein.18. for the foregoing reasons, i am inclined to direct the registry to place the matter .....

T.P.Parameswaran Vs. High Court of Judicature at Madras

Court : Chennai

..... 42.at this juncture, we deem it appropriate to point out that in the decision of the honourable supreme court in s.nagaraj and others v. state of karnataka and another, [1993 suppl. (4) supreme court cases 595]., it is held that review literally and even judicially means re-examination or reconsideration. basic philosophy inherent ..... the rules made under article 229(2) of the constitution of india, the hon'ble chief justice is the sole authority for fixing the salaries, etc.and controlling the high court employees as per the decision in pradyat kumar bose v. the hon'ble the chief justice of calcutta high court, [(1955) 2 s.c ..... tamil law journal. (viii)the petitioner submitted the post of official assignee had onerous responsibilities like, (i)administering oaths under section 78 of the presidency towns insolvency act; (ii)possession of judicial powers in enquiring into proof affidavit; (iii)adjudicating on claims on insolvency law; (iv)administering the estate of insolvents etc.also that, .....

Goodearth Maritime Vs. the Commissioner of Service Tax

Court : Chennai

..... be established by him. a mere assertion about undue hardship would not be sufficient. it was noted by this court in s. vasudeva v. state of karnataka, (1993) 3 scc467that under indian conditions expression undue hardship is normally related to economic hardship. undue which means something which is not merited by the conduct ..... chapter, the decision or order appealed against relates to any duty demanded in respect of goods which are not under the control of central excise authorities or any penalty levied under this act, the person desirous of appealing against such decision or order shall, pending the appeal, deposit with the adjudicating authority the ..... of the ship management services, maintenance and repair services, technical and analysis service, business auxilliary service and business support service , were taxable under the finance act, 1994 on the terms that the services were received from a person located abroad and therefore they were liable to pay service tax as a recipient of .....

New India Assurance Co.Ltd Vs. Smt.Periyammal

Court : Chennai

..... and general insurance company limited and another, vs. mrs. sayar kanwar and others reported in 1976 acj426 a division bench of the karnataka court, held that merely because three persons travelled in the motor cycle, it does not amount to contributory negligence. (viii) the ..... on the part of the drivers involved in the accident to swerve the vehicles, to avoid any head on collision, the control of the vehicles, on account of the impact or the injuries sustained by the drivers, the position of the vehicles, may ..... -w-4142 rushed from opposite direction, which was driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner, without following any traffic rules and regulations, and dashed against the said motor cycle. all the three persons died. in this connection, a criminal ..... and 1526 of 2009, on the file of the motor accident claims tribunal, (additional district judge and special judge for ec act cases), salem, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. on such .....

O. Meenakshi Vs. State rep by Inspector of Police, CBI/ACB, Shastri Bh ...

Court : Chennai

..... against the accused in respect of the commission of that offence." 12. support of the above view was drawn by this court from earlier decisions rendered in state of karnataka vs. l.muniswamy, 1977 cri.l.j. 1125, state of maharashtra and others vs. som nath thapa and others, 1996 cri.l.j. 2448 and state ..... his official position granted licences to m/s.atoz life science, puducherry and seven other manufacturing units for manufacture of new drugs without the prior approval of the drugs controller general of india, new delhi. in pursuance of the conspiracy, the petitioner herein (a2) and the 3rd accused-vaidyanathan (deceased) and others did not apply ..... drugs, without even applying and obtaining prior approval of the drugs controller general of india, new delhi. further, the petitioner has without even subjecting the said 25 drugs to the safety, and efficacy test and also clinical test as stipulated in the drugs and cosmetics act and rules, and thereby the health of the consumer/patients were .....

M/s. Sumeet Synthetics, Represented by its Authorized Signatory Vs. De ...

Court : Chennai

..... been exercised with due circumspection. (ii) in 2012 (8) supreme court cases 216 michigan rubber (india) limited vs. state of karnataka and others it has been held as follows:- 23. from the above decisions, the following principles emerge : (a) the basic ..... p.w.d. and the said norms are in the interest of public safety and would facilitate smooth movement of traffic, it will be difficult to hold that the rules and sub-rules of p.w.d. contemplated in the advertisement ..... there is no bar for petitioner to participate in the tender. the certificate produced by the petitioner from the pollution control board at gujarat categorically sates that if the plant is attached to the common effluent treatment plant, that affluent plant ..... administrators especially in contractual matters. for interference, it must be shown that the decision is such that no responsible authority acting resonably and in accordance with relevant law could have reached and there must be an element of public interest. further, .....

Amaravathy Cranes and Structurals Ltd Vs. the District Collector Trive ...

Court : Chennai

..... or to the general public etc. ......" 33.he further placed reliance upon a judgment of the supreme court in bangalore city cooperative housing society limited v. state of karnataka, reported in (2012) 3 scc 72.and in paragraphs 45 to 48, it was observed as follows : "45.we have considered the respective arguments. the framers ..... deliberate delay. the court should not harm innocent parties if their rights have in fact emerged by delay on the part of the petitioners. (vide durga prashad v. chief controller of imports and exports11, collector (la) v. katiji12, dehri rohtas light railway co. ltd. v. district board, bhojpur13, dayal singh v. union of india14 and ..... fraud. 36.he also referred to an another judgment of the supreme court in state of karnataka v. y. moideen kunhi reported in (2009) 13 scc 19.for contending that the word sufficient cause found under section 5 of the limitation act must receive liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice. ultimately, the court has to .....

Mr.C.Thayaparan Vs. Inspector of Police,

Court : Chennai

..... a direction to the lower court to proceed with the trial in accordance with the previsions of law. 24.in air 200.sc (supp) 834 [superintendent of police, karnataka lokayukta vs. b.srinivas], it has been held as follows:- "the question relates to the alleged deficiency in authorization made by the superintendent of police authorizing the inspector ..... vs. v.jayapaul] 07.2004 scc (cri) 1584 [s.jeevanantham vs. state through inspector of police, t.n.] 08.(2009)1 scc (cri)679 [u.p. pollution control board vs. dr.bhupendra kumar modi and another] 09.(2009)6 scc 35.[central bureau of investigation vs. a.ravishankar prasad and others] 10.(2009)10 scc 67.[central bureau ..... senior counsel elaborated his submission by stating that the grant of approval for starting a new college or for grant of extension of approval was governed by 1987 act (act no.52/1987) and the council has framed regulations for grant of approval and that is known as 'all india council for technical education (grant of approval .....