Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka traffic control act 1960 chapter 5 miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 32 of about 394 results (0.514 seconds)

Sri-la-sri Shanmuga Desiga Gnanasambanda Pandarasannadhi Avargal and H ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1994)2MLJ313

..... the courts.23. in the matter of : cauvery water disputes tribunal : air1992sc522 , the next decision cited by learned counsel for the appellants, the karnataka cauvery basin irrigation protection ordinance, 1991 was held unconstitutional for the reason that the ordinance directly nullified the decision of the tribunal dated 25th june, 1991 ..... might 'notify' the temple or endowment. and on the publication of such notification the administration of the temple or endowment would go under the control of the board notwithstanding the scheme which might have been framed already. on taking management of a notified temple or endowment the board was authorised ..... for the proper administration and governance of certain hindu religious endowments. the act provided for the supervision of the hindu religious endowments through a statutory body known as the madras hindu religious endowments board. provisions were made for the control of religious endowments as well as specific endowments, in relation to .....

Kongu Nadu Vettuva Gounder Elaingar Nala Sangam Vs. the Inspector Gene ...

Court : Chennai

..... following judgments: i) a decision of the hon'ble supreme court reported in (2004) 4 scc684in the case of state of karnataka and another vs. dr.praveen bhai thogadia; ".8. the high court in our view should not have glossed over these ..... any disturbance to the public tranquility. (iii)the appellant shall hold the procession in an organised way and with assured control of the entire cadres. (iv)while in the procession, the appellant shall not shout any slogans affecting the religious sentiments ..... of meeting straight away as there will be a brake of 4.30 hours. the police are directed to regulate traffic and permit the writ petitioners to conduct procession and meeting as aforesaid. the conditions imposed by the learned single judge ..... assemblies and processions and licensing of the same in the places in question, the provisions of section 30 of the police act, 1861 are applicable and the said section reads as under: (1) the district superintendent or assistant district superintendent of police .....

T.M.Thaniyarasu Vs. Commissioner of Police

Court : Chennai

..... hold procession and conduct public meeting. the learned advocate general relied on the decisions reported in (2004) 4 scc684(state of karnataka v. dr.praveen bhai togadia); (2012) 5 scc1(ramlila maidan incident, in re); division bench judgment of this court reported ..... disturbance to the public tranquility. (iii)the appellant shall hold the procession in an organised way and with assured control of the entire cadres. (iv)while in the procession, the appellant shall not shout any slogans affecting the religious ..... of political party, which is organising the same, when such procession and meetings were conducted earlier, there were traffic hazards and law and order problem arose, and bearing the said issues in mind the request to conduct procession ..... the utmost humility and self restraint. 32.the judiciary must therefore exercise self-restraint and eschew the temptation to act as a super legislature or a court of appeal sitting over the decisions of the administrative authorities. by exercising .....

B. Ranganathan and Another Vs. State Represented by Inspector of Polic ...

Court : Chennai

..... also. witnesses need as much protection against vexatious prosecutions as parties and the court should have as much control over the acts of witnesses that enter as a component of a judicial proceeding, as over the acts of parties. if, therefore, the provisions of clause (c) are extended to witnesses, the extension would ..... private complaint would be maintainable. the question which requires consideration is which of the two interpretations should be accepted having regard to the scheme of the act and object sought to be achieved...... 7........ 8........ 9. the scheme of the statutory provision may now be examined. broadly, section 195 crpc deals ..... have serious impact on society. similarly, any compromise between the victim and offender in relation to the offences under special statutes like prevention of corruption act or the offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity etc; cannot provide for any basis for quashing criminal proceedings involving such offences. .....

Swadeshi Cotton Mills Thozhilalar Shemanala Padukappu Union Represente ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1984)1MLJ228

..... a few officers of the central government. the supreme court pointed out that in the absence of a statutory provision, a commercial corporation acting on its own behalf, even though it is controlled wholly or partially by a government department, will be ordinarily presumed not to be a servant or agent of the state; such an ..... out independent opinion as to their implications.13. in workmen, karnataka provident fund employees' union v. additional tribunal, gandhinagar (1983) l.i.c. 1523, a bench of the karnataka high court had to construe the expressions occurring in section 2(a)(i) of the act to find out as to whether provident fund organisation constituted under ..... the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act xix of 1952 would become an industry carried on by or .....

Misha Power Pvt Ltd Vs. Tangedco Ltd

Court : Chennai

..... one among them. in the said meeting the potential vendors had raised various queries towards technical specification for remote monitoring, qualification criteria, payment clause, capacitors, control on the project cost, guarantee, etc. while so, the 1st respondent has issued corrigendum 2 dated 18.02.2012 along with the clarification for queries raised ..... only concerned with the manner in which those decisions have been taken. the extent of the duty to act fairly will vary from case to case. shortly put, the grounds upon which an administrative action is subject to control by judicial review are : (i) illegality; (ii)irrationality; and (iii) procedural impropriety. further, the ..... as per the rules, the petitioner cannot dictate terms to the authorities to do certain act to suit to his convenience. hence, this contention fails. " (ii) (2012) 8 scc 21.(m/s.michigan rubber (india) ltd. vs. the state of karnataka & ors.: "19. while considering the above submissions, the three-judge bench held as .....

Sembu Harinath Vs. The Deputy General Manager,

Court : Chennai

..... . m.paul anthony vs. bharat gold mines ltd., and another reported in air1999sc1416and the deputy inspector general of police and another vs. s.samuthiram (2013) 1 lw319and divisional controller, karnataka state road transport corportion v. m.g.vittal rao (2012) 1 scc442 i held that when the scope of enquiry in both the proceedings are different, both the proceedings ..... private limited vs. girish v. and others [2014 (3) scc636, wherein in paragraph 10, it has been held as under:-"0. the relatively recent decision of this court in karnataka srtc v. m.g. vittal rao [2012 (1) scc442:2012. (1) scc (l&s) 171, is a timely reminder of the principles that are applicable in such situations ..... action in having abetted misappropriation and embezzlement of customers' deposits under clause 5(1) of bps, dated 10.04.2002 and amended from time to time. (iv) you did acts prejudicial to the interests of the bank - a gross misconduct under clause 5(d) and 5(j) of bps, dated 10.04.2002, and amended from time to .....

Bharathidasan University Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

..... the employees, especially of the commercial taxes department, should be directed to be regularised since the decisions in dharwad district pwd literate daily wage employees assn. vs. state of karnataka [1990 (2) scc396, state of haryana vs. piara singh [1992 (4) scc118, jacob m.puthuparambil vs. kerala water authority [1991 (1) scc28 and gujarat ..... flouting and rendering the rules governing the recruitment of staff of the university as meaningless. the hon'ble apex court in the case of umadevi vs. state of karnataka reported in 2006 (4) scc1held that the persons, who were appointed without following the procedure and entered through back door method, are to be driven out ..... be sufficient for the duty to have been imposed by charter, common law, custom or even contract. (judicial review of administrative act 4th ed. p.540). we share this view. the judicial control over the fast expanding maze of bodies affecting the rights of the people should not be put into watertight compartment. it should .....

R. M. Ar. R.M. Ramanathan Chettiar Alias R.M. A.R. Ramanathan Chettiar ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1974)1MLJ221

..... (3) of section 8 has to be applied without reference to the said explanation i, notwithstanding the fact that the said explanation directly and vitally affects and controls the operation of sub-section (3) of section 8. after all, what exactly is the problem with reference to the impact of the amended explanation 1 ..... for the repayment of a debt payable at such commencement.as we have pointed out already, substantial changes have been made to the 1938 act by the 1973 act. this 1973 act has completely altered the three-fold classification of debts referred to above and classified all the debts due by the agriculturists into two classes, ..... inference that the payment is ordinarily first allocated towards interest and thereafter the balance in respect of principal. that was recognised in two decisions under the madras agriculturists relief act, 1938, in ramaswami aiyar v. ramayya sastrigal : (1941)1mlj295 and in venkiteswara aiyar v. ramaswami aiyar : (1941)1mlj9 . in my view the recognised and .....

The Registrar, University of Madras and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)2MLJ367

..... enterprises v. a.p. state consumer commission, hyderabad : air1991ap326 , by kerala high court itself in padmanabhan v. consumer d.r. forum and anr. : air1992ker179 and by karnataka high court in indian engineering institution v. the president, the district consumer's redressal forum and ors. : air1994kant329 . the kerala high court took the same view in a ..... under the care of teachers. the clerical work, if any they may do, is only incidental to their principal work of teaching.32. in mohinijain v. state of karnataka : [1992]3scr658 , delivering the judgment of the bench, kuldip singh, j., held that without making 'right to education' under article 41 of the constitution a ..... university would not fall within the scope of the said act.60. the orissa state commission held in biren kumar jagdev v. controller of examinations, utkal university and anr. (1992) 2 c.p.j. 903, that education is not outside the scope of the present act. the commission has placed reliance on the decision in monisa .....