Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition act 1961 section 25 licence for tapping for neera Court: delhi Page 6 of about 57 results (0.113 seconds)

Jul 17 2017 (HC)

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central-3 vs.sanjay Jain

Court : Delhi

..... 23 coram: justice s.muralidhar justice prathiba m. singh % judgment1707.2017 dr. s. muralidhar 1.these appeals by the revenue under section 260a of the income tax act, 1961 ( the act ) arise out of similar set of facts involving similar questions of law and are accordingly disposed of by this common judgment.2. in five of these appeals i. ..... the search. if for any reason the authorised officer wants to search the premises again, it could be done by obtaining a fresh authorisation. there is no prohibition in respect of the same premises. it is open to the empowered authority the authorisation is issued once, the authorised officer cannot go on visiting the premises under ..... assessment up to 31st december, 2009. the decision in c ramaiah reddy 25.1 in this context, the court would like to refer to the decision of the karnataka high court in c. ramaiah reddy v. assistant commissioner of income tax (2011) 339 itr201(kar.) where these very provisions were examined in extenso. there the court .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 2013 (TRI)

Shuman Mukherjee Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... in the instant case. in this regard, the oa applicant has relied on a decision of honble supreme court in the case of kazia mohammed muzzammil vs. state of karnataka and another, (2010) 8 scc 155 in which it has been laid down that regarding deemed confirmation the courts have to take a view with reference to the facts ..... more opportunity. the oa applicant had not protested at that time and had enjoyed another year on the post of director (commercial). had he been aggrieved by the aforesaid act of the respondents he should have at that very stage protested and asked for either confirmation to be issued or his being relieved from the post. now he cannot ..... confirmation, as is demonstrable from the language employed in the rule, does not occur with efflux of time. as it is hedged by a condition, an affirmative or positive act is the requisite by the employer. in our considered opinion, an order of confirmation is required to be passed. he also relied on the decision of honble supreme court in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 2018 (HC)

Deepak vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... 141/2018, registered at ps model town, under section 376 read with section 313 of the indian penal code, 1860 and section 3 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 submitting inter alia to the effect that he has been falsely implicated in the instant case and that the petitioner and the complainant had a long standing relationship ..... no.2221/2016 bombay high court dated 09.01.2017, x vs. state & y, 2014 scc online mad 224 and shivashankar @ shiva vs. state of karnataka & anr. criminal appeal no.504/2018 3. the petitioner has further submitted that the complainant has nowhere alleged that the petitioner had established forcible physical relationship with her ..... is required and that the mobile phone of the petitioner with cd has been seized through seizure memo and deposited in malkhana. section 67 of the information technology act, 2000 provides as under : - 67 punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form. whoever publishes or transmits or causes to be published or .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2019 (HC)

Raid Hooda vs.university of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... the fact that the accused has already deposited the amount the benefit available under the probation of offenders act, 1958 (in short the probation act ) can be extended. strong reliance is placed on a decision of in bore gowda v. state of karnataka [(2000) 10 scc260:2000. scc (cri) 1244]. . it is pointed out that though the ..... vs. uoi (1980) 2 scc768even though having prima facie found a rule relating to education inappropriate, stopped short of invalidating the same reasoning that the court must act on sure ground, especially when matters of policy, socio- educational investigation and expert evaluation of variables are involved and held that to doubt is not enough to ..... accused has died during pendency of appeal his legal representatives have been impleaded and benefit available under section 12 of the probation act should not be denied to them.14. coming to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2019 (HC)

Amit Kumar vs.university of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... the fact that the accused has already deposited the amount the benefit available under the probation of offenders act, 1958 (in short the probation act ) can be extended. strong reliance is placed on a decision of in bore gowda v. state of karnataka [(2000) 10 scc260:2000. scc (cri) 1244]. . it is pointed out that though the ..... vs. uoi (1980) 2 scc768even though having prima facie found a rule relating to education inappropriate, stopped short of invalidating the same reasoning that the court must act on sure ground, especially when matters of policy, socio- educational investigation and expert evaluation of variables are involved and held that to doubt is not enough to ..... accused has died during pendency of appeal his legal representatives have been impleaded and benefit available under section 12 of the probation act should not be denied to them.14. coming to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2019 (HC)

Bhoopendra Kumar vs.university of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... the fact that the accused has already deposited the amount the benefit available under the probation of offenders act, 1958 (in short the probation act ) can be extended. strong reliance is placed on a decision of in bore gowda v. state of karnataka [(2000) 10 scc260:2000. scc (cri) 1244]. . it is pointed out that though the ..... vs. uoi (1980) 2 scc768even though having prima facie found a rule relating to education inappropriate, stopped short of invalidating the same reasoning that the court must act on sure ground, especially when matters of policy, socio- educational investigation and expert evaluation of variables are involved and held that to doubt is not enough to ..... accused has died during pendency of appeal his legal representatives have been impleaded and benefit available under section 12 of the probation act should not be denied to them.14. coming to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2019 (HC)

Surat Singh vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... the fact that the accused has already deposited the amount the benefit available under the probation of offenders act, 1958 (in short the probation act ) can be extended. strong reliance is placed on a decision of in bore gowda v. state of karnataka [(2000) 10 scc260:2000. scc (cri) 1244]. . it is pointed out that though the ..... vs. uoi (1980) 2 scc768even though having prima facie found a rule relating to education inappropriate, stopped short of invalidating the same reasoning that the court must act on sure ground, especially when matters of policy, socio- educational investigation and expert evaluation of variables are involved and held that to doubt is not enough to ..... accused has died during pendency of appeal his legal representatives have been impleaded and benefit available under section 12 of the probation act should not be denied to them.14. coming to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2010 (HC)

Saketh India Limited Vs. W. Diamond India Limited

Court : Delhi

..... declared a sick industrial unit in terms of section 3(1)(o) of sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 ('sica' for short). before us, the only aspect that has been argued is that sica places a complete prohibition on all judicial proceedings leaving no alternative to the trial judge other than ordering the rejection of the plaint.2 ..... . it appears from a perusal of the records that summons in form 4 under order xxxvii of the cpc were served on defendant no. 1 by affixation at hosur, karnataka on 22.8. ..... by the arguments of learned counsel for the appellant that the provisions of sica should be applied to the facts of the present case. assuming that there is a prohibition placed, and not just a moratorium, placed by section 22 of sica on legal proceedings against a company coming within the pale of that statute, it remained .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 2016 (HC)

Surajit Nundy and Others Vs. Management of Mirambika Free Progress Sch ...

Court : Delhi

..... in the factories act, 1948. it was yet further contended that since there is no provision for shifting within the locality, it is deemed to be prohibited. reliance was placed on ramchandra ganpat shinde vs. state of maharashtra (1993) 4 scc 216, mahadevappa lachappa kinagi vs. state of karnataka (2008) 12 ..... efficient instruction. 33. distinction between school and its property becomes further clear from section 7 of the school act which requires only schools receiving aid to furnish particulars of their property and prohibits only schools receiving aid from transferring, mortgaging or leasing their property without the previous permission of the appropriate ..... recognition and closure of unrecognised schools. while the said process was still on, the rte act, 2009 was enforced and section 18 whereof prohibits establishment and functioning of unrecognised schools. section 19 of the said act also lays down norms and standards for schools. 49. i have however on further consideration concluded .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 2009 (HC)

P.C. JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT326

..... distinguishable. in both the cases the court struck down the bar placed on the legal practitioners to practice before the tribunal constituted under the concerned statutes on the ground that the prohibition ..... supra) and struck down a similar provision, that is, section 48(8) of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 which barred legal practitioners from appearing before the land tribunals, functioning under the karnataka land reforms act, 961.26. in our view, the two cases cited by the petitioners are clearly ..... the supreme court in the case of h.s. srinivasa raghavachar and ors. v. state of karnataka and ors. : [1987]2scr1189 in so far as issue with regard to prohibition on legal practitioners appearing in various proceedings before land tribunals was concerned. justice o. chinappa reddy ( .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //