Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition act 1961 section 25 licence for tapping for neera Page 1 of about 84 results (0.116 seconds)

Rudrappa Mahadevappa Humbi (Deceased) by L.Rs and ors. Vs. Shivalingap ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2001(6)KarLJ394

..... constructions made by them', when they handed over the vacant possession to the lessors-landlords herein.4. during the subsistence of the lease, the karnataka rent control act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'act' for brevity) came into force, which governed the relationship of the landlord and tenant in the matter of evictions and other matters provided therein.5 ..... sub-lease complained of by the landlord was at a point of time much after coming into force part 5 of the karnataka rent control act, 1961 and also the act. therefore,section 23 of the act, applies to the facts of the case. by that section, he is debarred from sub-leasing,23. shri subhash b. adi ..... iyengar deserves to be accepted for the following reasons.-section 23 of the karnataka rent control act prohibits the tenant from sub-leasing the leased property after the commencement of part v of the act. the act came into force on 16-11-1961. section 23 of the act reads as under.- '(1) notwithstanding anything contained in any law, but .....

Jayashankara Gowda Vs. Chief Secretary

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR1005

..... orderbopanna, j.1. in this batch of writ petitions the constitutional validity of the karnataka local authorities (prohibition of defection) act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the act) is challenged by the petitioners on various grounds. principally their challenge is premised on the ground of violation of articles 14, 19(1)(a) and ..... political party is one of the essential features for the establishment of panchayat raj and that is the reason the preamble to the act makes it clear that the act is meant to prohibit defection by the members of the zilla parishad and mandal panchayat from the political parties by which they were set up as candidates ..... urgency in dealing with such complaints and if any authority is necessary on this point, the decision of the supreme court in bata shoes co. v. ganguly, : (1961)illj303sc may be referred to. in the circumstances, the impugned order does not call for interference. accordingly, these petitions stand dismissedin writ petition no. 13844 of 1987, .....

Aishat Shifa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... on february 5, 2022. this g.o has a preamble, which refers to the karnataka education act, 1983 and the rules framed therein, from where it draws its powers and then cites three judgments of different high courts to conclude that prohibiting hijab does not amount to a violation of article 25 of the constitution. it then ..... to the government education department (pre-university) *substituted by the corrigendum/addendum dated 5.2.2022 **inserted by the corrigendum/addendum dated 5.2.202215. the karnataka education act, 19839, under which the above government order has been issued, was enacted with a view to foster the harmonious development of the mental and physical faculties ..... in the abovementioned rulings of the hon ble supreme court and various high courts, since the prohibition of a headscarf or a garment covering the head is not a violation of article 25 of the constitution. additionally, in terms of the [karnataka education act, 1983 article 133 sub rule (2) and article 7(1)(i), 7(2)(g .....

Tejaswini Patil and Etc. Vs. Bangalore Uuniversity and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1991Kant352; ILR1991KAR387; 1991(1)KarLJ556

..... two thousand only). for this purpose 'government seats' shall mean government seats as defined by section 2(e) of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fees) act, 1984; (c) karnataka students (other than students admitted against government seats as at (b) above) admitted by private medical colleges shall be charged ..... lakh rupees i.e. selling the medical and engineering collegeseats. the government has also powers to take action under the karnataka educational institutions prohibition of capitation fees act, 1985, under section 9 the government can authorise any high ranking officer to search and inspect the records and other documents ..... -10 lakh rupees) in the name of donation (unaccounted, no receipt for the payment) violating all the provisions of the karnataka educational institutions prohibition of capitation fees act 1984. even in the legislative assembly speaker s. m. krishna also charged that these colleges are collecting huge amount. the government .....

Veranna Veerabhadrappa Vs. the District Registrar and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant27; ILR2004KAR4699; 2004(7)KarLJ646

..... which the declaration has been published under section 19 of the bangalore development authority act 1976 or section 19 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1987. therefore, as could be seen from the above provisions that what is prohibited is alienation of lands situated in urban area which has been acquired by the government ..... have been either acquired by government or in respect of which acquisition proceedings have been initiated by the government. sections 3 & 4 of the act read as under: 3. prohibition on transfer of lands acquired by government - no person shall purport to transfer by sale, mortgage, gift, lease or otherwise any land ..... the registration act as well as the karnataka (restriction on transfer) act 1991, hereinafter called the restriction on transfer act, and under the urban land ceiling act. it was contended by the learned senior counsel that the sub-registrar has no power to refuse to register the sale deed when none of the acts prohibit the registration .....

V.D.S.R.Re.Rolling Mill. Vs. the Special Commissioner and Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

..... respondent 3 and 4. thus the respondents 3 and 4 became tenants. they filed an application in form-7 under section 48-a of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961, for registering them as occupants thereof, and that the land tribunal concerned having held an enquiry, granted occupancy rights in their favour, as prayed ..... of law or on the basis of rules or regulations governing such grant. after the coming into force of the karnataka scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prohibition of transfer of certain lands) act, 1978 (karnataka act 2 of 1979), notices were issued by the appropriate authority to the transferees of such lands to show cause as ..... this ground also, the petition should fail. secondly, the grants made in favour of the original grantees are admittedly free grants. the rule governing the grant prohibited alienation of the lands in question permanently. the lands in question were granted to scheduled caste person taking into account their social backgrounds, poverty, illiteracy and .....

Tashi Delek Gaming Solutions (Private) Limited and ors. Vs. State of K ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2005Kant261; ILR2005KAR1548; 2005(2)KarLJ403

..... dated 24-7-2004 issued in exercise of powers conferred by section 5 of the lotteries (regulation) act, 1998 (for short, 'the act') the government of karnataka declared the state to be a free zone from online and internet lotteries and prohibited the sale of all computerized and online lottery tickets marketed and operated through vending machines, terminals, electronic ..... learned single judge also held that it was the state government alone which could prohibit the sale of lottery tickets in a state under section 5 of the act and when the sale is so prohibited as has been done by the state of karnataka by the impugned notification, it was only the state of sikkim or other state ..... governments which could feel aggrieved by the said prohibition and not any individual. it was further held that .....

Rahamtulla and ors. Vs. State

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1978CriLJ109

..... /1971 convicting the petitioners who were respectively a-l, a-2, a-3, a-5, a-6 and a-7 under section 14 (2) r/w 32 of the karnataka excise act and sentencing each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four months and to pay a fine of rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo r ..... be sufficient to meet the ends of justice if instead of sentencing them to imprisonment an order is made under section 4 of the p. o. act.4. no doubt section 32 of the karnataka excise act prescribes for the first offence a minimum sentence of three months' rigorous imprisonment and fine of not less than rs. 100/-. but, as pointed out by ..... three months' r.i. and a fine of not less than rs. 100/- is prescribed by the karnataka excise act for a person found guilty of the offence under section 32 of that act, the court can still resort to the provisions of the p.o. act if the conditions required for the application of those provisions exist. in the case on hand, there .....

Harikumar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : I(1994)DMC356; ILR1993KAR3035; 1994(3)KarLJ335

..... 13th april 1993, has referred the following point of law for decision of the full bench as per section 7 of the karnataka high court act, 1961. the said point of law reads as under:- 'whether section 8-a of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 is constitutionally and legally valid?' 2. we have heard learned advocate appearing for the appellant-accused and the learned advocate general ..... for respondent-state of karnataka, as well as the learned standing counsel for the central government, who has waived service of notice issued to the attorney .....

Union of India (Uoi), Represented Through the General Manager, Central ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 103(2007)CLT710

..... substitute of octroi duty, so also it cannot be called as a tax in aid of the funds of local authority. therefore, section 184(1) of the railways act, 1989 prohibiting levy of tax in aid of funds of local authority cannot be made applicable for claiming exemption by the railway against levy of entry tax.9. point no. (2 ..... state and is an indirect tax in which the taxable event is on the entry of goods.we also rely upon the decision in union of india v. state of karnataka (2002) 126 stc 501, and further after going through all these decisions, the irresistible conclusion is that the entry tax by no stretch of imagination can be held ..... parties, shri ashok mohanty, learned senior standing counsel of the commercial taxes department, relied upon a decision of the karnataka high court in union of india v. state of karnataka (2002) 126 stc 501, which followed the decisions in in re, sea customs act (1878), section 20(2) (supra) and collector of customs v. state of west bengal (supra). learned .....