Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition act 1961 section 25 licence for tapping for neera Court: delhi Page 4 of about 57 results (0.087 seconds)

Eris Lifesciences Limited vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... constituted by the central government and headed by prof. c.k. kokate, vice- chancellor of kle university of belgaum, karnataka (kokate committee).8. thereafter, the central government issued 344 notifications prohibiting proscribing the manufacture, sale and distribution of 344 fdcs with immediate effect. one of the said notifications being s.o. ..... same. the submission is therefore, rejected. 20. at this stage it is relevant to refer to section 26a of the act, which reads as under: 26a. power of central government to prohibit manufacture, etc., of drug and cosmetic in public interest. without prejudice w.p. (c) 10917/2018 and connected matters ..... petitions impugning notification no.s.o.4479(e)(hereafter the impugned notification ) issued by the central government under section 26a of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 (hereafter the act ), whereby the manufacture, sale and distribution of the fixed dose combination (fdc) of pioglitazone 30 mg + metformin 500 mg has been proscribed .....

National Board of Examinations Vs. Ms. Rajni Bajaj and anr

Court : Delhi

..... to attract the application of this doctrine. however, there will be cases where not only such specific rules, as noticed above, are absent but the rules specifically prohibit extension of the period of probation or even specifically provide that upon expiry of that period he shall attain the status of a temporary or a confirmed employee. ..... it was also held that the termination was also bad in law in view of the provisions of maternity benefits act, 1961 which provided that where a human absents herself from work in accordance with provisions of that act it shall be unlawful for the employer to discharge or dismiss her on account of such an absence. it ..... committee of management and others: 2011 (10) scale.251. these somewhat different lines of thought were noticed by supreme court in khazia mohammed muzammil v. the state of karnataka: (2010) 8 scc 155 and the legal proposition in the matter was enunciated as follows: "on a clear analysis of the above enunciated law, particularly, the seven .....

Management of CPWD Vs. Abdul Gaffar and Others

Court : Delhi

..... 'ble supreme court rendered in ongc ltd. vs. petroleum coal labour union and ors. 2015 (5) scale 353 where hon'ble supreme court observed that the prohibition laid down in umadevi does not apply to industrial adjudication. the relevant portion of this judicial pronouncement was reproduced with advantage:- 11. on behalf of the workmen ..... therefore, it was contended that the tribunal was right in directing the workmen concerned to be regularised and that the law laid down in umadevi (3) [state of karnataka v. umadevi (3), (2006) 4 scc 1 : had no application to cases of industrial adjudication. xxxxx xxxxx xxxxxx 27. further, it is very clear from ..... has almost obliterated the distinction between the two jurisdictions. while exercising jurisdiction to issue a writ of certiorari, the high court may annul or set aside the act, order or proceedings of the subordinate courts but cannot substitute its own decision in place thereof. in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction the high court may not .....

Union of India & Ors vs.m/s Rvg Metals & Alloys Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... tax return and paid the income tax assessed on him and paid the income tax on the basis of self assessment as provided in the income-tax act, 1961 (43 of 1961): lpa1842019 & conn. matters page 39 of 78 provided further that the administering authority shall not grant its sanction for the transfer of exploration licence ..... additional affidavit, by highlighting safety reasons and public importance, it was sought to be lpa1842019 & conn. matters page 76 of 78 indicated that on account of prohibition or importance of preventing mining and exploration of atomic minerals, mining leases of majority of the lessees have been cancelled or stopped since 2013. however, if we ..... 23.04.2019, the importance of preventing illegal mining activities, the rampant corruption going on in the field of mining, particularly, in the states of orissa, karnataka, goa and banning all mining activities by the hon ble supreme court in these cases have been highlighted and this court is requested that looking to the high .....

Union of India & Ors vs.m/s Standard Metalloys Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... tax return and paid the income tax assessed on him and paid the income tax on the basis of self assessment as provided in the income-tax act, 1961 (43 of 1961): lpa1842019 & conn. matters page 39 of 78 provided further that the administering authority shall not grant its sanction for the transfer of exploration licence ..... additional affidavit, by highlighting safety reasons and public importance, it was sought to be lpa1842019 & conn. matters page 76 of 78 indicated that on account of prohibition or importance of preventing mining and exploration of atomic minerals, mining leases of majority of the lessees have been cancelled or stopped since 2013. however, if we ..... 23.04.2019, the importance of preventing illegal mining activities, the rampant corruption going on in the field of mining, particularly, in the states of orissa, karnataka, goa and banning all mining activities by the hon ble supreme court in these cases have been highlighted and this court is requested that looking to the high .....

Union of India & Ors vs.m/s Rvg Minerals & Metals Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... tax return and paid the income tax assessed on him and paid the income tax on the basis of self assessment as provided in the income-tax act, 1961 (43 of 1961): lpa1842019 & conn. matters page 39 of 78 provided further that the administering authority shall not grant its sanction for the transfer of exploration licence ..... additional affidavit, by highlighting safety reasons and public importance, it was sought to be lpa1842019 & conn. matters page 76 of 78 indicated that on account of prohibition or importance of preventing mining and exploration of atomic minerals, mining leases of majority of the lessees have been cancelled or stopped since 2013. however, if we ..... 23.04.2019, the importance of preventing illegal mining activities, the rampant corruption going on in the field of mining, particularly, in the states of orissa, karnataka, goa and banning all mining activities by the hon ble supreme court in these cases have been highlighted and this court is requested that looking to the high .....

Union of India & Ors vs.m/s Apex Metalloys Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... tax return and paid the income tax assessed on him and paid the income tax on the basis of self assessment as provided in the income-tax act, 1961 (43 of 1961): lpa1842019 & conn. matters page 39 of 78 provided further that the administering authority shall not grant its sanction for the transfer of exploration licence ..... additional affidavit, by highlighting safety reasons and public importance, it was sought to be lpa1842019 & conn. matters page 76 of 78 indicated that on account of prohibition or importance of preventing mining and exploration of atomic minerals, mining leases of majority of the lessees have been cancelled or stopped since 2013. however, if we ..... 23.04.2019, the importance of preventing illegal mining activities, the rampant corruption going on in the field of mining, particularly, in the states of orissa, karnataka, goa and banning all mining activities by the hon ble supreme court in these cases have been highlighted and this court is requested that looking to the high .....

Pemba T. Bhutia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 152(2008)DLT500

..... so far as r. rajagopal reddy (supra) is concerned, it is a decision under the benami transactions (prohibition) act, 1968. the supreme court in this decision held that the bar created by section 4(1) of the said act was prospective i.e. it did not apply to pending suits. the court held that the legislature had ..... so called retrospective operation of rule 18 of cser 1996, viz u.o.i. v. tushar ranjan mohanty and ors. : (1994)5scc450 , k. narayanan and ors. v. state of karnataka : air1994sc55 , r. rajagopal reddy (dead) by lr and ors. v. padmini chandrasekharan (dead) by lrs, : [1995]213itr340(sc) , and, chairman railway board and ors. v ..... entered into any transaction or negotiations with the authority, cannot invoke the doctrine of legitimate expectation, merely on the ground that the authority has a general obligation to act fairly.29. the supreme court referred to its earlier decision in union of india v. hindustan development corporation : air1994sc988 , wherein the court has, inter alia, .....

Sajjan Kumar Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 132(2006)DLT18; 2006(90)DRJ420

..... the derogatory words were uttered at a private place, then the essential ingredients of section 3(1)(x) of the sc&st; act would not be satisfied. this is what has been held by a learned single judge of the karnataka high court in chandra poojari (supra).14. in mukesh kumar saini (supra), this court had also come to the conclusion that ..... orissa high court, while considering the provisions of section 18 of the sc&st; act was of the view that the expression 'accusation of having committed an offence under this act' did not mean that the mere registration of a case under the act would ipso facto attract the prohibition contained in section 18. the learned single judge observed that the opinion of the .....

Darshan Singh Vs. Forward India Finance (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1984Delhi140; 24(1983)DLT261; 1984(6)DRJ18; 1984RLR236

..... lord asquith can also be reproduced here with advantage :- 'if you are bidden to treat an imaginary state of affairs as real, you must surely, unless prohibited from doing so, also imagine as real the consequences and incidents which, if the putative state of affairs had in fact existed, must inevitably have flowed from ..... they are not. if you assume that they are a suit, then the article is satisfied. (13) the judgment of the karnataka high court was given under section 20 of the arbitration act, where an application was made to the court for a reference to arbitration. we would not like to decide this case on ..... required compulsory registration, and was otherwise inadmissible in evidence. in another judgment of the supreme court, kashinathasa yamosa kabadi, etc. v. narisingsa bhaskarsa kabadi, etc. : [1961]3scr792 , it was also observed that a no testamentary instrument purporting or operating to create, declare, assign, limit or extinguish any right, title on interest in immoveable .....