Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition act 1961 section 25 licence for tapping for neera Court: drat delhi

May 17 2004 (TRI)

Seema Textiles and ors. Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank

Court : DRAT Delhi

Reported in : I(2005)BC1

..... court in syndicate bank v. m/s. chamundi industries, air 2002 karnataka 56, wherein it was held as follows : "section 19 of the act, which prescribes procedure for the tribunals for adjudication on the application filed by the bank for recovery of money does not prohibit filing an application on causes of action which arises wholly or in part within its ..... in case where application is filed on more than a single cause of action, the rule is to be held directory and not mandatory. further, section 19 of the act, does not prohibit filing an application by the bank seeking for relief or reliefs based on causes of action. whereas rule 10 of the rules ..... prohibits seeking relief or reliefs based on more than single cause of action. therefore, limiting the claim based on only cause of action under the rule is inconsistent with the act. under the rules of interpretation, if the rule is inconsistent with the provisions of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //