Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition act 1961 section 112 articles seized Court: madhya pradesh Page 19 of about 185 results (1.425 seconds)

Sahodra Devi Vs. Ramnarayan Satyanarayan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1991ACJ695

..... 95 (madras) and kannammal v. a.s. kasim 1989 acj 647 (madras), are not applicable in the present case. in those cases there was pleading and proof of prohibition for entry in the area where the incident took place, which is lacking in the present case. moreover, this court is bound by the decisions of this court. therefore, ..... the public is also comprehended within the definitional meaning of the words 'public place'. in the case of madarsab saheblala kattimani v. nagappa vtitappa katabugol 1982 acj 279 (karnataka), it has been held that where an accident is caused by a truck in a private place tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain and try the application. in this case ..... unless the accident took place on a public place. there is no provision to the effect that an application for award of compensation under section 110-a of the act would not be maintainable unless the accident took place on a public place. the said contention of the learned counsel for the appellants is also, thus, without .....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rafeeka Sultan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2001ACJ648; 2000(3)MPLJ561

..... associating the owner or the driver in the appeal when the owner or the driver is not an aggrieved person cannot be allowed to mock at the law which prohibits the insurer from filing any appeal except on the limited grounds on which it could defend the claims petition. we cannot put our stamp of approval as to ..... ltd. v. ajay 1994 acj 987 (mp); sarjubai v. gurudip singh 1994 acj 997 (mp); revanappa v. gunde rao 1982 (supp) acj 348 (karnataka); noreen r. srikantaiah v. l. dasarath ramaiah 1985 acj 628 (karnataka); state of mysore v. k.l. subbanna, air 1974 kant 109; gaya prasad v. suresh kumar 1992 acj 200 (mp); united india insurance co. ..... is required to follow the procedure prescribed under the code of civil procedure in that regard. it is obviously an essential attribute of the claims tribunal that it acts judicially and exercises civil jurisdiction in deciding the claims relating to civil wrongs and civil liability of tortfeasors and liability also of insurers arising out of the statutory .....

Smt. Mamta Shukla Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... the employee could not be declared or granted a permanent status in accordance with the provisions of madhya pradesh industrial relations act, 1960. 20. a constitutional bench of hon'ble supreme court in secretary, state of karnataka and others vs. umadevi and others, (2006) 4 scc 01 has held as under in regard to regularization and ..... terrain. to note only one stage in 1856 a royal commission was set up to consider whether changes were necessary in the system established by the operative 1834 act. the report of the commission is known as northoote-trevelyan report. the report was pungent in its criticism when it says that: in civil services comparable ..... . govt. of andhra pradesh, air 1964 sc 160 has resolved the conflict between mandatory provisions of section 17 (1) and section 18(1) of the industrial dispute act, 1947. the learned author hon'ble justice shri g.p. singh, in principles of statutory interpretation has referred the decision as under: an interesting question relating to .....

Satbir Sharma Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1997)ILLJ463MP; 1996(0)MPLJ881

..... remand the matter to the learned single judge for his decision on merits. we find no prohibition anywhere in any law for the course that we are adopting. we respectfully rely on the decision of the full bench of the karnataka high court (supra) in adopting the course of remand of the matter to the learned single ..... , but attaches to the original conduct (misconduct) which constituted the offence of which the official has been convicted.(e) section 12 of the probation of offenders act does not wash away or obliterate the conduct of the employee which has led to his conviction and does not, therefore, give him any immunity against departmental ..... section 304a of the indian penal code. a judgment of acquittal was recorded on december 29, 1983. separately a claim petition was preferred under the motor vehicles act. the motor accident claims tribunal passed an award on october 22, 1986. the dependents of the two deceased employees were given compensation. the petitioner along with insurance .....

Samir Banerji Vs. State Bank of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... petition is two folded. the firs.question is as to whether the departmental proceedings initiated against the petitioners fall in the category of an act which amounts to prohibiting the petitioners from carrying out demonstrations and thereby infringing their fundamental rights available under article 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of ..... 9- in support of her contentions, learned senior advocate placed reliance on the following judgments of the supreme court and this court to show that prohibition against peaceful demonstration is not permissible, a constitutional right is available to the employees to make demonstrations and protest against the illegal attitude of the ..... very basis for issuance of charge-sheet is unlawful and unsustainable, therefore, interference can be made and she points out that the high court of karnataka at bangalore, under similar circumstances, has stayed the departmental proceedings. it is emphasized by her that office bearers throughout the country have been proceeded .....