Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition act 1961 section 112 articles seized Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 185 results (0.236 seconds)

S.P.Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... engineering vide srl. no.7 and 8 candidates were warned that they should not make any identification mark or writing name in the answer book is strictly prohibited. it was also indicated that candidate not observing the instructions would be disqualified. that apart, candidates were directed to write their roll numbers in words only. ..... is unsustainable. referring to the findings recorded by the tribunal from para 8 onwards and placing reliance on a judgment of the supreme court in the case of karnataka public service commission & others vs. b. m. vijaya shankar and others - (1992)2 scc page 207, learned senior counsel tried to distinguish the present ..... we have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. the only question which warrants consideration in this writ petition is as to whether the act of 5 the petitioners as are indicated hereinabove entitles the railway administration not to evaluate the answer sheets of the petitioners?. before adverting to consider the .....

Sahodra Devi Agrawal Vs. Ramnarayan Satyanarayan (Firm) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : I(1992)ACC113; 1991(0)MPLJ942

..... madras), and kannammal v. a.s. kasim, 1989 (2) acj 647 (mad.), are not applicable in the present case. in those cases there was pleading and proof of prohibition for entry in the area where the incident took place, which is lacking in the present case. moreover, this court is bound by the decisions of this court. therefore, in ..... public is also comprehended within the definitional meaning of the words 'public place'. in the case of madrasah saheblala kattimani v. nagappa vittappa katabugol, 1982 acj 279 (karnataka), it has been held that where an accident is caused by a truck in a private place tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain and try the application. in this case ..... unless the accident took place on a public place. there is no provision to the effect that an application for award of compensation under section 110-a of the act would not be maintainable unless the accident took place on a public place. the said contention of the learned counsel for the appellants is also, thus, without .....

Sahodra Devi Vs. Ramnarayan Satyanarayan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1991ACJ695

..... 95 (madras) and kannammal v. a.s. kasim 1989 acj 647 (madras), are not applicable in the present case. in those cases there was pleading and proof of prohibition for entry in the area where the incident took place, which is lacking in the present case. moreover, this court is bound by the decisions of this court. therefore, ..... the public is also comprehended within the definitional meaning of the words 'public place'. in the case of madarsab saheblala kattimani v. nagappa vtitappa katabugol 1982 acj 279 (karnataka), it has been held that where an accident is caused by a truck in a private place tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain and try the application. in this case ..... unless the accident took place on a public place. there is no provision to the effect that an application for award of compensation under section 110-a of the act would not be maintainable unless the accident took place on a public place. the said contention of the learned counsel for the appellants is also, thus, without .....

Chitranjan Singh S/O Khushal Singh Vs. State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ781

..... petition are these -on a report lodged by the complainant, dr. sadhna a case under sections 498a and 406, indian penal code and sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act, has been registered at crime no. 43 of 1994 by police station mahila thana, padav, gwalior against the petitioner, his wife dr. puspalata and his son dr. arvind, ..... was subjected to cruelty on a demand of 5 tolas of gold and rs. 1.50 lakhs for getting dr. sadhna admitted to m. s. gynecs in college at bangalore (karnataka) and another rs. 1.50 lakhs for opening a nursing home. that demand was, however, not met and, therefore, the complainant, dr. sadhna was being treated with ..... are in consonance with the intendment and provisions of section 437, criminal procedure code. therefore, the court held that for an offence under section 14-a of the panchayat raj act and under section 353 of the indian penal code, the chief judicial magistrate could not have directed the accused to hand over charge of office of pradhan after his .....

Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)17VST465(MP)

..... trade. if the authorities concerned really wanted to hamper anybody's trade, they could easily raise the amount of tax or toll to an amount which would be prohibitive or deterrent or create other impediments which instead of facilitating trade and commerce would hamper them. it is here that the contrast, between 'freedom' (article 301 ..... to that conferred upon parliament by article 302 subject to the following differences:(a) while the power of parliament under article 302 is subject to the prohibition of preference and discrimination decreed by article 303(1) unless parliament makes the declaration under article 303(2), the state power contained in article 304(b ..... above decision dealt with the challenge against the validity of the karnataka tax on entry of goods into local areas for consumption, use or sale therein act (27 of 1979). reference has been made to the majority view in atiabari tea co. ltd. v. state of assam : [1961]1scr809 and automobile transport (rajasthan) ltd. v. state of .....

M/s. Technofab Engineering Limited and Others Vs. Bharat Heavy Electri ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... to grant relief to the seekers of probates, whereas plaintiffs in civil suits were thought deserving of such an upper limit. the discrimination is a piece of class legislation prohibited by the guarantee of equal protection of laws embodied in article 14 of the constitution. on this ground also item 10 cannot be sustained "93. we approve this ..... the levy of court fees ad valorem on the value or amount of the subject matter of suits and appeals without any prescription of upper limit in the concerned states (karnataka, rajasthan and maharashtra) enactments. the point no.(d) considered by the supreme court in this decision, as articulated in paragraph 31 of the judgment, is more or ..... limit which, having regard to all circumstances, could be envisaged at rs.75,000. the upper limit even prior to 1974 under the bombay act was rs.15,000 and prior to 1961 under the rajasthan act' at rs.7500. having regard to steep inflation over the two decades the upper limit could perhaps go upto rs.75,000. after .....

Shobhit Samayya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Judgement Given By: ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... this purpose, it is necessary to survey the precedents which deal with what constitutes testimonial compulsion and how testimonial acts are distinguished from the collection of ..... judged by provisions of evidence act, 1872. the apex court held that it was for trial court to record any finding in respect thereof. [9].10. in selvi vs. state of karnataka, the apex court held thus:-"45. the next issue is whether the results gathered from the impugned tests amount to "testimonial compulsion" thereby attracting the prohibition of article 20(3). for .....

Motiram Mandhyani and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2004MP82

..... to satisfy that rules 19 and 20 are riot applicable to the cases at hand and rule 4 of the rules does not prohibit for grant of excess area and that jda had acted in good faith by following the general circular issued by the state government. as these aspects are interconnected with other submissions and the ..... is equally settled law that the promissory estoppel cannot be used to compel the government or a public authority to carry out a representation or promise which is prohibited by law or which was devoid of the authority or power of the officer of the government or the public authority to make. doctrine of promissory estoppel ..... . personal asstt. to collector and addl. district magistrate, nellore, air 1976 sc 143, and the scheduled caste and weaker section welfare association (regd.) v. state of karnataka, air 1991 sc 1117.17. to appreciate the aforesaid submission, we have carefully perused he aforesaid decisions. in our considered opinion, the contention set forth is without any .....

Ramniwas and Others Vs. Game Range Chambal Sanctuary Bhind Headquarter ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2012CrLJ1747

..... . k.a. kunchindammed (2002) 9 scc 90, this court observed that even the expression sandalwood as contained in the karnataka forest act, 1963 would include sandalwood oil. this court in no uncertain terms held: (scc p. 99, paras 23-24) 23. the karnataka forest act is a special statute enacted for the purpose of preserving the forests and the forest produce in the state ..... 's tractor trolley was found laden with sand, surface soil, a forest produce in the prohibited area. accordingly, the vehicle was seized and a forest criminal case was registered against the petitioner under 1927 act. the 'forest produce' is defined in section 4 of the 1927 act. it is not in dispute between the parties that forest officials sent an intimation of aforesaid .....

ispat Khadan Janta Mazdoor Union. Vs. the Director, Steel Authority of ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... , the government of the state in which that other establishment is situated, will be the appropriate government.(2)(a) a notification under section 10(1) of the clra act prohibiting employment of contract labour in any process, operation or other work in any establishment has to be issued by the appropriate government : (1) after consulting with the central ..... persons who are employed or to be employed in the mine. under mines creche rules,1966, the facility used to be provided to 1500 female workers. maternity benefit act, 1961 is also applicable. the total control on all workers was of mines manager. the workers can enter the mine only with the permission of the manager. form b ..... chandigarh and others air 2004 sc 969;workmen of nilgiri co- op.mkt. society ltd. vs. state of tamil nadu and others air 2004 sc 1639; state of karnataka & ors. vs. kgsd canteen employees welfare association & ors. air 2006 sc 845.26. there is yet another facet to the instant case. employment of the contract labour .....