Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka prohibition act 1961 section 112 articles seized Court: madhya pradesh Page 11 of about 185 results (0.818 seconds)

Sep 15 2008 (HC)

M.P. Transport Workers Federation and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(5)MPHT374

..... the provision unconstitutional when guidelines can be gathered from the scheme and setting of the statute.42. in m.j. sivani and ors. v. state of karnataka and ors. : [1995]3scr329 , it has been ruled thus:.the guidance for exercising the discretion need not ex facie be found in the notification or orders ..... regard being had to the aforesaid pronouncement of law and the principles culled out therefrom, it is apposite to have a close scrutiny of the act. the act was introduced to regulate the relations of employer and employees in certain matters, to make provision for settlement of industrial disputes and to provide for certain ..... with the constitutional validity of pondicherry municipal decree (levy and validation of taxes, duties, cesses and fees) ordinance, 1973, which was replaced with the validation act. a contention was raised that there is excessive delegation of the legislative power inasmuch as there was total abdication and effacement of pondicherry legislature of its essential .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1968 (HC)

Jagdish Mitra Sharma Vs. Jiyajee Rao Cotton Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1970)ILLJ129MP

..... in regard to those matters.7. now, coming to an examination of the material provisions of the madhya pradesh industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1961, the act is one enactedto provide for rules defining with sufficient preocsion in certain matters the conditions of employment of employees in undertakings in the state of ..... the standing orders. indeed if such freedom had been left to the parties, then the whole object of the madhya pradesh industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1961, and of the standard standing orders made thereunder would be totally defeated. 8. the view that certified standing orders represent the relevant terms and conditions ..... and his employment was on a probationary period of six months. but the standard standing orders made under the madhya pradesh industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1961, are applicable to the employer, mills. under the standing orders, a permanent employee is one who has completed six months' satisfactory service in a .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2004 (HC)

D.P. Agrawal Vs. Cit

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [2004]141TAXMAN626(MP)

..... court in the decision of bacha f. guzdar v. cit : [1955]27itr1(sc) . it is clear, therefore, that the words derived from in section 80hh of the income tax act, 1961 must be understood as something which has direct or immediate nexus with the appellants industrial undertaking. although electricity may be required for the purposes of the industrial undertaking, the deposit ..... they do not cease to be shrimps and prawns and become other distinct commodities. the apex court has approved the decision of supreme court in sterling foods v. state of karnataka : 1986(26)elt3(sc) . the apex court has held thus:'6. apart therefrom, there is the judgment of this court in sterling foods v. state of ..... karnataka : 1986(26)elt3(sc) where it has been held that processed or frozen shrimps and prawns are commercially regarded as the same commodity as raw shrimps and prawns. when .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 1998 (HC)

Chandra Mohan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(MP)272

orderd.p.s. chauhan, j.:the petitioner is an assessee assessed to income-tax under the provisions of the it act, 1961 (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as 'the act')2. the petitioner, by means of this petition, has approached this court seeking relief for insurance of a writ in the nature of mandarnus commanding the respondents ..... for the petitioner placed reliance on the case of r. gopal ramnarayana vs . ito : [1980]126itr369(kar) . it is a decision of single judge of the karnataka high court. this case has no foundation so far as the proposition in the present case is concerned. in this case so relied on, the position was different i.e ..... pendency of the writ petition, the assessment was completed overruling the petitioner's objection that there was no cause for initiating action under ss. 147, 148 of the act. against this order, the petitioner appealed and ultimately the tribunal by order dt. 12th april, 1989, quashed the reassessment holding that the assessee having filed a return of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2010 (HC)

ispat Khadan Janta Mazdoor Union. Vs. the Director, Steel Authority of ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... , the government of the state in which that other establishment is situated, will be the appropriate government.(2)(a) a notification under section 10(1) of the clra act prohibiting employment of contract labour in any process, operation or other work in any establishment has to be issued by the appropriate government : (1) after consulting with the central ..... persons who are employed or to be employed in the mine. under mines creche rules,1966, the facility used to be provided to 1500 female workers. maternity benefit act, 1961 is also applicable. the total control on all workers was of mines manager. the workers can enter the mine only with the permission of the manager. form b ..... chandigarh and others air 2004 sc 969;workmen of nilgiri co- op.mkt. society ltd. vs. state of tamil nadu and others air 2004 sc 1639; state of karnataka & ors. vs. kgsd canteen employees welfare association & ors. air 2006 sc 845.26. there is yet another facet to the instant case. employment of the contract labour .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 1976 (HC)

The Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. State Transpor ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1976MP169

..... transport corporation on the routes mentioned in clause (2) above are specified in the schedule annexed hereto. the provision of transport services otherwise than under the scheme is prohibited. except (i) the vehicles of gujarat state nominees plying under the terms of reciprocal agreement between the state of madhya pradesh and gujarat covering routes or portions thereof ..... and purposes and such permits cannot be issued during finalisation of the draft scheme no. 80. in j.t. development co. v. s.t.a. authority, air 1961 mp 23 it has been said that a condition could be implied in every permit that in the event of an appeal against the grant being allowed, the grant ..... moreover, this sub-section was introduced during pendency of appeal in that case and in view of sub-section (4) of section 58 introduced by the same amending act that the amended provision would not apply to appeals pending on the date of coming into force of the amendment, there was no question of applying this sub-section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 05 1962 (HC)

Daluram Pannalal Modi Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [1962]13STC759(MP)

..... was a case in which the petitioner was entitled as of right to a writ of certiorari for quashing the assessment and to a writ of prohibition for preventing the sales tax authorities from acting without jurisdiction.5 we are unable to accede to the contentions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. there is no dispute that the issue of ..... he cannot delegate the power to another and keep the duty to himself.as stated by the supreme court in syed shah v. commissioner of wakfs a.i.r. 1961 s.c. 1095, the privy council decision is an authority for the proposition that where powers and duties are interconnected and it is not possible to separate one from ..... it was capricious and arbitrary and in making that assessment the assistant commissioner did not exercise any judgment. relying on calcutta discount co. ltd. v. income-tax officer (1961) a.i.r. 1961 s.c.372, kensington income tax commissioners v. aramayo [1916] 1 a.c. 215, and the statement of law in halsbury's laws of england (third edn., .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2006 (HC)

Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Authority Under the Minimum ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2007)IILLJ750MP

..... on the basis of this judgment in cases where such a direction has been given effect to and it has become final.(5) on issuance of prohibition notification under section 10(1) of the clra act prohibiting employment of contract labour or otherwise, in an industrial dispute brought before, it by any contract labour in regard to conditions of service, the industrial adjudicator ..... as may be authorised within such time and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed.26. the state of madhya pradesh has incorporated an amendment by m.p. act no. 23 of 1961 incorporating section 1a to section 12. the said provision reads as under:(1-4) where immediately before the issue of a notification under section 5 fixing or revising .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1968 (HC)

Raipur Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd., Raipur and anr. Vs. the State of Madhy ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1969MP150; 1968MPLJ854

..... they provided for the taking over of kachha routes. the point is without any merit. there is no provision in the motor vehicles act prohibiting the inclusion of kachha route in a scheme framed under chapter iv-a of the act 64. for the foregoing reasons, with the exception of misc. petition no. 112 of 1966, all other petitions are dismissed with costs ..... grant of permits on alternative routes, it must be so stated in the scheme.in this connection, learned counsel referred us to kashi prasad v. r. t. authority gorakhpur, air 1961 all 214 where a single judge of the allahabad high court has held that the offer for alternative routes should be made in the scheme itself, and not after the ..... the supreme court in ramnath verma v. state of raiasthan, (1963) 2 scr 152=(air 1967 sc 603), malik ram v. state of rajasthan, (1-.62) i scr 978= air 1961 sc 1575 and air 1967 sc 1815 as also by this court in air 1965 madh pra 196 and mp no. 351 of 1965 d/- 15-9-1966 (mp), in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1999 (HC)

Dinesh Gurjar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ649

..... any lottery, nor shall he sell, distribute or purchase any lottery ticket within the territory of madhya pradesh.'by virtue of this enactment i.e. act of 1993, the state has been empowered to prohibit the sale of lotteries in the state of m. p. and consequently, the state banned the sale of lotteries of the royal government of bhutan ..... government, it cannot be sold in the state of kerala without permission from the state.'our attention was also invited to the decisions of karnataka high court in the case of g. moorthy and ors. v. state of karnataka and ors., 1993(1) kar.l.j. 376 (db) wherein their lordships observed as under :'32. for the reasons stated above, ..... the legislative power of the parliament, as such the action of the authorities of the government of karnataka in seizing the lottery tickets of lottery conducted by the royal government of bhutan are valid and are well within the ambit of the act, as such the same do not travel beyond the authority of the state and do not infringe .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //