Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka industries facilitation act 2002 section 15 certification Page 11 of about 23,791 results (0.191 seconds)

Sep 21 2011 (HC)

Pix Transmissions Limited Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... of division bench of gujarat high court where the said bench has considered the provisions of section 25 of minimum wages act and the remedies available under minimum wages act as also industrial disputes act. we do not find discussion therein of much assistance insofar as present controversy is concerned. manganese ore (i) ltd. ..... industrial dispute now, needs consideration. in the case of airfreight ltd. vs. state of karnataka, (supra) the hon'ble apex court has considered the provisions of section 27 of minimum wages act, 1948, and notification issued by karnataka government on 19.08.1987 along with relevant provisions of karnataka shops and commercial establishments act ..... also supported the order of reference. she contends that conciliation officer is acting in administrative capacity and hence, he is not required to record reasons in detail. according to her, role of conciliation officer is only to facilitate negotiations between parties and respondent no. 2 made an effort to bring .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2014 (HC)

The Director General (Works), Cpwd, Nirman Bhawan, Vs. Suresh Pal and ...

Court : Delhi

..... ensuring that they do not interfere unduly with the economic arrangement of its affairs by the state or its instrumentalities or lend themselves the instruments to facilitate the bypassing of the constitutional and statutory mandates. 9. since the services of the respondent have been regularised with effect from december 11, 2006 by ..... new delhi. according to him, the work of the petitioner was to maintain the buildings owned by the central government and is an industrial establishment governed by the industrial employment (standing orders) act, 1946. the respondent has been doing unskilled work but, his services have not been regularised by the petitioner till the date when ..... against the courts and tribunals granting regularisation de hors the recruitment rules. the relevant paragraphs of the judgment of the supreme court in secretary, state of karnataka vs. uma devi (supra) are as under: 12. in spite of this scheme, there may be occasions when the sovereign state or its instrumentalities .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 2016 (HC)

Ramdas and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... in the case of s.nandkishore lahoti (supra) which deals with the question of sub-delegation under the provisions of the maharashtra municipal councils, nagar panchayats and industrial townships act, 1966. 29. the division bench of this court in the case of mihir yadunath tatthe (cited supra) has considered the very issue which falls for consideration ..... justice into such legislative activity. moreover, a provision for 'such inquiry as it may consider necessary' by a subordinate legislating body is generally an enabling provision to facilitate the subordinate legislating body to obtain relevant information from any source and it is not intended to vest any right in anybody. (union of india and anr. ..... to note that the constitution bench of their lordships of supreme court in the case of k.t.plantation pvt. ltd. and another .vs. state of karnataka reported in air 2011 sc 3430 has approved the view taken in the case of pune municipal corporation (cited supra). it will be appropriate to refer to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 1987 (HC)

Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. Court of the Civil Judge, Karwar and ors ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR3445

..... development board (hereinafter referred to as 'the board) for the acquisition of these lands under the provisions of the karnataka industrial areas development act, 1966 (shortly called 'the act) after declaring -the said lands as an industrial area.3. the contention of the petitioner is that the company was not notified of the proceedings before the civil court under s. 20(c) of the land ..... state, or in the board. it may be, by reserving certain areas exclusively for establishment of industries or developing certain lands to facilitate the growth of industries therein. for an orderly development of industries, it will be necessary to provide facilities such as power, communication, roads, or even industrial sheds. provisions may have to be done for allocation of sites or sheds, in which case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 2003 (HC)

The Executive Engineer, No. 4, Brlbc Division and ors. Vs. Lokesh Redd ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2003(4)KarLJ151; (2003)IIILLJ662Kant

..... six months from the date of communication to him of the order of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination or the date of commencement of the industrial disputes (karnataka amendment) act, 1987, whichever is later, apply in the prescribed manner, to the labour court for adjudication of the dispute and the labour court shall dispose ..... made even in respect of a dispute pending consideration of the government for reference, on the date of commencement of the industrial disputes (karnataka amendment) act, 1987'. section 78(1)(d)(i) of the bombay industrial relations act.-- '(d) a labour court shall have power to require an employer,where it finds that the order of dismissal, ..... division bench has observed as under.--'... it has to be kept in mind that section 10(4-a) of the act was intended to be a beneficial legislation for the workmen facilitating them to approach the court directly within the time specified therein'.(emphasis supplied)9. simply because it has been observed further .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1991 (HC)

Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1991KAR3789; 1991(3)KarLJ609

..... engaged in the manufacture of aluminium metal and has a smeltor complex at belgaum, it is alleged that in response to 'an invitation to investors in industry' published by the government of karnataka in 1966, the petitioners set up a smeltor complex and an aluminium plant at belgaum on the basis of the assurances given by the state government ..... the view that the tax levied being on the consumption of electricity is an independent impost and board collects from the petitioner the same, as it charges, to facilitate the collection of tax and it is not levied on the board but passed on to the consumer and allowed the writ petitions declaring that the petitioner is entitled ..... krishna iyer and desai, jj held that irrespective of whether the act was constitutionally valid or not the l.i.c. was bound to obey direction to pay bonus for the period 1st april 1975 to 31st march 1976.this court in jyothi home industries and ors. v. state of karnataka and ors., 1984(1) klj 394 held as follows:'however, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2013 (HC)

Rare (H) Minerals Private Limited Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... exercise of such power when the administering authority makes an order the same is subject to appeal under section 34(1) of the act of 2002. the impugned guidelines having been issued merely to facilitate the evaluation of applications made cannot be termed as an order and hence it cannot be said that the petitioner had remedy of ..... to exploration of minerals and hence, the public trust doctrine as enunciated by the hon'ble apex court in its decision reported in reliance natural resources limited vs. reliance industries limited, (2010) 7 scc 1 was applicable. (d) it was thereafter, submitted that the guidelines dated 29.12.2010 merely laid down the criteria for selecting ..... manufacturing company v. m/s bharat coking coal ltd and another, air 1983 sc 239, the central arecanut and cocoa marketing and processing cooperative ltd. v. state of karnataka and others, air 1998 sc 2399 and basantkumar v. state of rajasthan and others, (2001) 7 scc 201. it was also submitted that there was no question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2024 (HC)

Sri. Basanagouda R Patil (yatnal) Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... not being a union territory or railway area]., without the consent of the government of that state.64. it is also relevant to refer to section 21 of the karnataka general clauses act, 1897 which reads thus; 21. power to issue, to include power to add to, amend, vary or rescind notifications, orders, rules or bye-laws. where, ..... the agency is not required to seek fresh permission every time it enters that state in connection with investigation or for every case. a general consent is given to facilitate seamless investigation in a case of corruption or violence. b) specific consent, when a general consent is withdrawn, cbi needs to seek case-wise consent for investigation ..... was sent to the cbi due to the involvement of a central government employee. the petitioner/cbi cites the cases of harish fabiani v. ed2022scc online 3121, prakash industries v. union of india 2023 scc online del 336, and v.p. nanda kumar v. ed2023scc online ker 6848 to establish that sharing information under section 66(2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2024 (HC)

Central Bureau Of Investigation Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... not being a union territory or railway area]., without the consent of the government of that state.64. it is also relevant to refer to section 21 of the karnataka general clauses act, 1897 which reads thus; 21. power to issue, to include power to add to, amend, vary or rescind notifications, orders, rules or bye-laws. where, ..... the agency is not required to seek fresh permission every time it enters that state in connection with investigation or for every case. a general consent is given to facilitate seamless investigation in a case of corruption or violence. b) specific consent, when a general consent is withdrawn, cbi needs to seek case-wise consent for investigation ..... was sent to the cbi due to the involvement of a central government employee. the petitioner/cbi cites the cases of harish fabiani v. ed2022scc online 3121, prakash industries v. union of india 2023 scc online del 336, and v.p. nanda kumar v. ed2023scc online ker 6848 to establish that sharing information under section 66(2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 2004 (HC)

Balakrishna Hatcheries Vs. Clarification and Advance Ruling Authority

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2004]137STC187(Kar)

..... name and address of the appellant and the description of the contents are printed on the polythene bag.3. entry 22 of the fifth schedule to the karnataka sales tax act, 1957 ('the act' for short) exempts from tax 'eggs and meat including flesh of poultry except when sold in sealed containers', correspondingly, entry 8(vii) of part f ..... be opened and the dressed chicken can be taken out without tearing or damaging the plastic bag. it is contended that stapling or crimping is done, only to facilitate easy carrying and to ensure that the dressed chicken does not slip out of the plastic bag. stapling or crimping does not make the polythene bag airtight or ..... and refer to the significant changes that have taken place in food processing and packaging, in the decades which have passed since the decision in g.g. industries was rendered. with the advancement of science and technology and increased consumer awareness, there is a manifold increase in the use of ordinary non-hermetical sealed containers .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //