Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka industries facilitation act 2002 section 15 certification Page 12 of about 23,791 results (0.255 seconds)

Jul 31 2015 (HC)

Ashutosh Shankar Vs. State Bank of India Thr G.M. and

Court : Jharkhand

..... court reported in (2004) 3 scc553(abl international ltd. and another vs. export credit guarantee corporation of india ltd. and others) and (2009) 1 scc150(karnataka state forest industries corporation vs. indian rocks).10. learned counsels for the petitioners in support of their contention have referred to rule 29 (2) (3) of state bank of ..... the counter affidavit and vide letter dated 20.08.2007 the petitioners were advised to get the certificates of amfi certification from amfi and cir (certified insurance facilitator) from irda. it has been submitted in the counter affidavit that even after ten months of joining the petitioners have not successfully completed amfi/irda certification till ..... above observations of this court, once the state or an instrumentality of the state is a party of the contract, it has an obligation in law to act fairly, justly and reasonably which is the requirement of article 14 of the constitution of india 53. from the above, it is clear that when an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 1990 (HC)

Loharn and Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1991]80STC323(AP)

..... impugned notifications, the state has to forgo the revenue which is otherwise derivable from the charging provisions of the andhra pradesh general sales tax act. keeping in view the industrial development of the state and the consequential monetary and other advantages accruing to the state, there is nothing objectionable in the government restricting the ..... like to advert before we conclude. by declaring the notifications issued in the years 1981 and 1984 at this distance of time, we will perhaps be facilitating unjust enrichment by the assessee. there is no knowing whether during this interregnum the petitioner had passed on and collected the tax from the customers. the ..... the state of andhra pradesh because there is a possibility of the said finished products being manufactured out of the raw material purchased in the state of karnataka. it is difficult for the andhra pradesh sales tax authorities to keep track on the manufacturing activity in the other state and to test the correctness .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 02 1996 (HC)

Annamalai Cotton Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. the Chairman, Tamilnadu Electricit ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1996Mad364

..... of this contract have been settled over the years and have been widely adopted because experience shows that they facilitate the supply of electric energy. lord diplock has observed: 'if fairness or reasonableness were relevant to their enforceability ..... introduced the condition regarding security and each of the petitioners had accepted the term.'56. in the decision reported in hyderabadengineering industries ltd. v. a. p. state electricity board : [1988]3scr159 the supreme court has observed as follows:-- ' ..... explain any circumstance or circumstances responsible for the doubt.'86. in shreejee plastics v. the karnataka electricity board : air1995kant157 the karnataka high court has held that the parties have to be furnished with whatever material sought to be ..... such contract, clause 3 states that the petitioner undertook to comply with all the requirements of the indian electricity act, the supply act, etc., and the terms and conditions of supply prescribed by the board from time to time. 15. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2004 (HC)

Workmen of Ge Power Controls India (Pvt.) Ltd. Rep. by G.E. Employees ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2004(102)FLR960]; (2004)3MLJ221

..... the workmen can ill afford. the procedure followed by civil courts, it was thought, would not facilitate a prompt and effective disposal of these disputes. as against this, the courts and tribunals created by the industrial disputes act are not shackled by these procedural laws nor is their award subject to any appeals or revisions. ..... can be made applicable. it is also the case of the respondent management that the impugned order is only a shifting of the industrial undertaking from hosur to pondicherry and also bommachandra (karnataka), which cannot be deemed to be a closure.13. a close reading of the impugned notice and the averments made by the ..... the premises to the first respondent, which will get a locational advantage. the averment that the production machineries were shifted from hosur to pondicherry and bomachandra in karnataka is denied. the transfer of some of the workmen was made to meet the exigency. 108 workers accepted vrs and retired from service. the other allegations .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2011 (HC)

Malathi Rau, Bangalore and Others Vs. the Chief Engineer (West), Banga ...

Court : Karnataka

..... (bbmp for short) to consider the said representation in accordance with law and in terms of section 443(3) of the karnataka municipal corporation act, 1976 (for short the act) as well as under the relevant regulation. since the second respondent did not consider the representation pursuant to the order referred to ..... was expiring. the revision of master plan was necessitated in view of the urban infrastructure, housing and commercial activities calling for zonal changes to facilitate orderly development of city, taking into consideration the possible future goal for the next one decade. accordingly, the revised master plan 2015 for the ..... the revised master plan, 2015 was developed to address the over all vision for the city of bangalore. the over all vision gives scope for urban integration, industries and services, hawking/informed sector, mixed land usage, housing and shelter, transportation, re-development of lakes and urban afforestation, safe sanitation, water supply, energy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 2016 (HC)

Katta Subramanya Naidu and Another Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented ...

Court : Karnataka

..... acquisition of large tracts of land in bandikodigehalli and other villages in jala hobli, bangalore north taluk, for the establishment of it and ites industries, by the state of karnataka through the karnataka industrial areas development board, (kiadb), a statutory body. it is said that during the process of acquisition of lands, several officials of the kiadb ..... by accused no. 3, on behalf of itasca. it was then decided to appoint an agency to identify, interact and negotiate with the land owners to facilitate consent acquisition and accordingly a tripartite agreement is said to have been entered into between itasca, utl and indu builders, who is said to have been appointed ..... . in any event, the aforementioned arrangement was a private arrangement and could not be characterized as resulting in offences punishable under the provisions of the pc act. it is contended that in so far as the allegation that the petitioner had committed forgery in seeking to erase the word 'consent' in the draft .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2018 (SC)

State of Karnataka . Vs. M/S Durga Projects Inc

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... be appropriate to refer to one of them: hpl chemicals ltd. v cce4 . after adverting to the decisions in dunlop india ltd. (supra), and bharat forge and press industries pvt. ltd. (supra), this court reiterated that only such goods as cannot be brought under the various specific entries in the tariff should be attempted to be brought under ..... in a works contract amounts to re-writing the statute, which is against the settled cannon of interpretation that in a taxing statute nothing can be read in. [bansal wire industries ltd. v state of uttar pradesh, (2011) 6 scc545. 6 7 on the other hand, mr sk bagaria, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent ..... have to be analysed. 10 9 to facilitate an analysis of the submissions which have been urged on behalf of the state in appeal, it would be necessary to advert to the provisions of the kvat act 2003 prior to 1 april 2006 bearing on the controversy. 1 april 2006 assumes significance because by karnataka act 4 of 2006, clause (c) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2017 (HC)

Mr. k.c. Shankare Gowda Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... 06.2014 to the category of progressive livestock farmer and representative of industries connected with animal husbandry or fisheries and also the category of progressive fishermen, they were to be nominated by the chancellor which accordingly was done.4. by the amendment to the act through karnataka act no.37/2015 which received the assent of the governor on ..... that light they seek to sustain the notification dated 21.01.2016 whereunder the notification dated 13.01.2016 is withheld/kept in abeyance as that would facilitate them to complete the period of three years for which they claim to have been nominated. 10 3. the brief facts are that the kvafsu was constituted ..... decision in the case of 32 t.krishnappa (supra). in that case, the right as claimed by the nominated member under section 10 of the karnataka agricultural produce marketing (regulation) act, 1966 for the benefit of the extended period of one year arose for consideration therein. this court in that context took note of the contents of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2015 (HC)

Mahesh Kumar Vs. State Bank of India and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

..... court reported in (2004) 3 scc553(abl international ltd. and another vs. export credit guarantee corporation of india ltd. and others) and (2009) 1 scc150(karnataka state forest industries corporation vs. indian rocks).10. learned counsels for the petitioners in support of their contention have referred to rule 29 (2) (3) of state bank of ..... the counter affidavit and vide letter dated 20.08.2007 the petitioners were advised to get the certificates of amfi certification from amfi and cir (certified insurance facilitator) from irda. it has been submitted in the counter affidavit that even after ten months of joining the petitioners have not successfully completed amfi/irda certification till ..... above observations of this court, once the state or an instrumentality of the state is a party of the contract, it has an obligation in law to act fairly, justly and reasonably which is the requirement of article 14 of the constitution of india 53. from the above, it is clear that when an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 1990 (HC)

Loharn and Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. the Govt. of A.P. Rep. by Its Sec ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(1)ALT424

..... the impugned notifications, the state has to forego the revenue which is otherwise derivable from the charging provisions of the a.p.g.s.t. act. keeping in view the industrial development of the state and the consequential monetary 'and other advantages accruing to the state, there is nothing objectionable in the government restricting the exemption ..... would like to advert before we conclude. by declaring the notifications issued in the years 1981 and 1984 at this distance of time, we will perhaps be facilitating unjust enrichment by the assessee. there is no knowing 'whether during this interregnum the petitioner had passed on and collected the tax from the customers. the reasonable ..... the state of a.p. because there is a possibility of the said finished products being manufactured out of the raw-material purchased in the state of karnataka. it is difficult for the andhra pradesh sales tax authorities to keep track on the manufacturing activity in the other state and to test the correctness .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //