Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: karnataka industries facilitation act 2002 section 15 certification Page 6 of about 23,791 results (2.324 seconds)

Godfrey Philips India Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)17VST465(MP)

..... and, therefore, if the urban local bodies utilise the octroi compensation disbursed to them in discharging their statutory duties, especially those which facilitate trade or provide factors, which affect trade in the industrial and commercial sectors within their local areas, that would not, in any way, affect or detract from the nature of the tax ..... in view of the background history and the facts and circumstances prevailing in the state of madhya pradesh entry tax imposed under the impugned act by its very nature and object facilitates trade and its movement and is compensator)'.(c) the revenue collected from imposition of the impugned tax is utilised by the state and ..... . hansa corporation : [1981]1scr823 .20. the above decision dealt with the challenge against the validity of the karnataka tax on entry of goods into local areas for consumption, use or sale therein act (27 of 1979). reference has been made to the majority view in atiabari tea co. ltd. v. state of assam : [1961]1scr809 and .....

A V Amarnathan Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... respondent no.2 that cauvery calling project is an off-spring of rally for rivers. it is aimed to facilitate the farmers to plant trees in the cauvery basin of tamil nadu and karnataka. as per the survey report, river cauvery, which is a source of life and livelihood for millions of people ..... loss of biodiversity stems from destruction of the habitat, extension of agriculture, filling up of wetlands, conversion of rich biodiversity sites for human settlement and industrial development, destruction of coastal areas and uncontrolled commercial exploitation. it is thus evident that the preservation of ecosystems, biodiversity and environment whether examined on common-law ..... respondent no.2 and take appropriate steps. this writ petition coming on for orders and having been heard and reserved for orders on19.2021, this day, acting chief justice, pronounced the following: order the present petition has been filed as a public interest litigation.2. the contention of the petitioner is that .....

State Represented By Vs. Ramakant Y Hullar

Court : Karnataka

..... annexure-p of the notification issued by the under secretary to government (mines) commerce and industries department in pursuance of sub-section (2) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, the government of karnataka accorded sanction for first renewal of mining lease no.1111 for a period of 20 years ..... does not call for interference by this court. accordingly, the petitions are liable to be dismissed inlimine.58. in support of his arguments, learned senior counsel has facilitated the following reliances of the hon ble supreme court: :62. : (i) sanjay kumar rai vs. state of uttar pradesh air2021sc2351in this judgment it is held ..... no.5/shri viswanathan, accused no.6/shri s.p. raju and accused no.7/ shri ramakant y hullur, are said to have fraudulently and dishonestly facilitated this illegal mining by way of illegally renewing the mining lease by changing the original sketch, issuing mineral dispatch permits without verifying the stocks and by not .....

State Represented By Vs. S P Raju

Court : Karnataka

..... annexure-p of the notification issued by the under secretary to government (mines) commerce and industries department in pursuance of sub-section (2) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, the government of karnataka accorded sanction for first renewal of mining lease no.1111 for a period of 20 years ..... does not call for interference by this court. accordingly, the petitions are liable to be dismissed inlimine.58. in support of his arguments, learned senior counsel has facilitated the following reliances of the hon ble supreme court: :62. : (i) sanjay kumar rai vs. state of uttar pradesh air2021sc2351in this judgment it is held ..... no.5/shri viswanathan, accused no.6/shri s.p. raju and accused no.7/ shri ramakant y hullur, are said to have fraudulently and dishonestly facilitated this illegal mining by way of illegally renewing the mining lease by changing the original sketch, issuing mineral dispatch permits without verifying the stocks and by not .....

State Represented By Vs. Smt Shameem Bhanu

Court : Karnataka

..... annexure-p of the notification issued by the under secretary to government (mines) commerce and industries department in pursuance of sub-section (2) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, the government of karnataka accorded sanction for first renewal of mining lease no.1111 for a period of 20 years ..... does not call for interference by this court. accordingly, the petitions are liable to be dismissed inlimine.58. in support of his arguments, learned senior counsel has facilitated the following reliances of the hon ble supreme court: :62. : (i) sanjay kumar rai vs. state of uttar pradesh air2021sc2351in this judgment it is held ..... no.5/shri viswanathan, accused no.6/shri s.p. raju and accused no.7/ shri ramakant y hullur, are said to have fraudulently and dishonestly facilitated this illegal mining by way of illegally renewing the mining lease by changing the original sketch, issuing mineral dispatch permits without verifying the stocks and by not .....

State Represented By Vs. Ritesh Milapchand Jain

Court : Karnataka

..... annexure-p of the notification issued by the under secretary to government (mines) commerce and industries department in pursuance of sub-section (2) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, the government of karnataka accorded sanction for first renewal of mining lease no.1111 for a period of 20 years ..... does not call for interference by this court. accordingly, the petitions are liable to be dismissed inlimine.58. in support of his arguments, learned senior counsel has facilitated the following reliances of the hon ble supreme court: :62. : (i) sanjay kumar rai vs. state of uttar pradesh air2021sc2351in this judgment it is held ..... no.5/shri viswanathan, accused no.6/shri s.p. raju and accused no.7/ shri ramakant y hullur, are said to have fraudulently and dishonestly facilitated this illegal mining by way of illegally renewing the mining lease by changing the original sketch, issuing mineral dispatch permits without verifying the stocks and by not .....

State Represented By Vs. Rajendra Kumar Jain

Court : Karnataka

..... annexure-p of the notification issued by the under secretary to government (mines) commerce and industries department in pursuance of sub-section (2) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, the government of karnataka accorded sanction for first renewal of mining lease no.1111 for a period of 20 years ..... does not call for interference by this court. accordingly, the petitions are liable to be dismissed inlimine.58. in support of his arguments, learned senior counsel has facilitated the following reliances of the hon ble supreme court: :62. : (i) sanjay kumar rai vs. state of uttar pradesh air2021sc2351in this judgment it is held ..... no.5/shri viswanathan, accused no.6/shri s.p. raju and accused no.7/ shri ramakant y hullur, are said to have fraudulently and dishonestly facilitated this illegal mining by way of illegally renewing the mining lease by changing the original sketch, issuing mineral dispatch permits without verifying the stocks and by not .....

State Represented By Vs. N Vishwanathan

Court : Karnataka

..... annexure-p of the notification issued by the under secretary to government (mines) commerce and industries department in pursuance of sub-section (2) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, the government of karnataka accorded sanction for first renewal of mining lease no.1111 for a period of 20 years ..... does not call for interference by this court. accordingly, the petitions are liable to be dismissed inlimine.58. in support of his arguments, learned senior counsel has facilitated the following reliances of the hon ble supreme court: :62. : (i) sanjay kumar rai vs. state of uttar pradesh air2021sc2351in this judgment it is held ..... no.5/shri viswanathan, accused no.6/shri s.p. raju and accused no.7/ shri ramakant y hullur, are said to have fraudulently and dishonestly facilitated this illegal mining by way of illegally renewing the mining lease by changing the original sketch, issuing mineral dispatch permits without verifying the stocks and by not .....

Sooraram Pratap Reddy and ors. Vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy Dis ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(6)ALD19(SC); 2008(4)AWC3875(SC); JT2008(9)SC622; RLW2008(4)SC2794; 2008(12)SCALE367; (2008)9SCC552; 2008(6)Supreme402

..... court held that the cumulative effect of all went to show that acquisition was for the public purpose of setting up technological park by government of karnataka through karnataka industrial areas development board and was, therefore, valid.140. in w.b. housing board etc. v. brijendra prasad gupta : (1997)6scc207 , ..... pattern of acquisition could be changed by the government. in ultimate analysis, what is considered to be an acquisition for facilitating the setting up of an industry in private sector could get imbued with the character of public purpose acquisition if only the government comes forward to sanction ..... . the policy laid down guidelines for attracting and facilitating private investment in infrastructure. it provided for infrastructure projects implementation in private-public partnership (ppp) requiring government support. the policy envisaged the need for a special legislation called infrastructure development act (`ida') supported by rules, guidelines and sectorial policies .....

M/s Chamundeswari Electricity Supply Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Raj Sheka ...

Court : Karnataka

..... the arbitral tribunal to be constituted under section 18 of the msme act, those are matters which can be raised before the arbitral tribunal, as held by the hon'ble supreme court in secure industries limited (supra). the question as to limitation of defendant no.1's claim raised before the facilitation council is a matter that is squarely within the sole province ..... and kollegal taluks by issuing a notice inviting tender in the year 2011. the 1st respondent emerges as a successful bidder. the 1st respondent is a small scale industry registered with the karnataka small scale industry and is engaged in the business of executing electrical projects. in view of the 1st respondent being declared a lowest bidder, a letter of intent was issued .....