Karle - Judgment Search Results
MagIn Vs. Karle
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-27-1893
Magin v. Karle - 150 U.S. 387 (1893) U.S. Supreme Court Magin v.
Asha Pralhad Karle and Others Vs. Sarpanch, Grampanchayat Valan, Taluk ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: May-02-2016
about as per directions given by the Respondents, late Pralhad Karle was doing a work of replacing electric bulb by climbing
Vimal Kishan Karle Vs. United India Insurance Company
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-13-1984
Reported in: 1(1985)ACC279
Sharad Manohar, J.1. The only grievance of the appellant in whose favour an order for payment of Rs. 21,600/- was...
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Karl Storz Endoscopy India (Pvt.) Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-13-1999
Reported in: (2000)(88)LC813Tri(Delhi)
1. The issue involved in this Appeal filed by M/s. Karl Storz Endoscopy India (P) Ltd. is whether Cold Light Fountain
L.T. Karle and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-15-2004
Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT80Tri(Bang.)
unit. They had used the spare capacity available with M/s. Karle International, a 100% EOU and exported such garments and thereafter
Karl Ettlinger Vs. Chagandas and Co.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-06-1915
Reported in: AIR1915Bom232; (1915)17BOMLR1087; 33Ind.Cas.205
Beaman, J.1. The plaintiffs, Ettlinger & Co., a firm of naturalized Germans, doing business in London, made a contract on...
The Commissioner of Customs Vs. L.T. Karle and Co. and the Customs, Ex ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-29-2006
Reported in: 2006(112)ECC488; 2006LC488(Madras); 2007(207)ELT358(Mad)
that since the said goods had been manufactured in M/s. Karle International, an 100% Export Oriented Unit (in short '100% EOU'),
Fdc Limited Vs. Karl Wuthrich, Lic Lur., Attroney Official Liquidator ...
Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-04-2014
Narendra Kawde, Member: 1. Complainant is a public limited Company, filed this consumer complaint through its Secretary (Executive) against the...
Sebi Vs. Consortex Karl Doelitzsch
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Feb-07-2006
registered as a public Limited company. The company identified Consortex Karl Doelitzsch GmbH from Germany as the foreign collaborator and entered
Venkat Son of. Baburao Karle Vs. the State of MaharashtrA.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-18-2012
1. These Revision Applications are tendered against judgment and award passed by the Extra Jt. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free