Karle - Judgment Search Results

MagIn Vs. Karle

Court: US Supreme Court

Magin v. Karle - 150 U.S. 387 (1893) U.S. Supreme Court Magin v.

Asha Pralhad Karle and Others Vs. Sarpanch, Grampanchayat Valan, Taluk ...

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

about as per directions given by the Respondents, late Pralhad Karle was doing a work of replacing electric bulb by climbing

Vimal Kishan Karle Vs. United India Insurance Company

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1(1985)ACC279

Sharad Manohar, J.1. The only grievance of the appellant in whose favour an order for payment of Rs. 21,600/- was...

Karl Storz Endoscopy India (Pvt.) Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(88)LC813Tri(Delhi)

1. The issue involved in this Appeal filed by M/s. Karl Storz Endoscopy India (P) Ltd. is whether Cold Light Fountain

L.T. Karle and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT80Tri(Bang.)

unit. They had used the spare capacity available with M/s. Karle International, a 100% EOU and exported such garments and thereafter

Karl Ettlinger Vs. Chagandas and Co.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1915Bom232; (1915)17BOMLR1087; 33Ind.Cas.205

Beaman, J.1. The plaintiffs, Ettlinger & Co., a firm of naturalized Germans, doing business in London, made a contract on...

The Commissioner of Customs Vs. L.T. Karle and Co. and the Customs, Ex ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2006(112)ECC488; 2006LC488(Madras); 2007(207)ELT358(Mad)

that since the said goods had been manufactured in M/s. Karle International, an 100% Export Oriented Unit (in short '100% EOU'),

Fdc Limited Vs. Karl Wuthrich, Lic Lur., Attroney Official Liquidator ...

Court: Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Narendra Kawde, Member: 1. Complainant is a public limited Company, filed this consumer complaint through its Secretary (Executive) against the...

Sebi Vs. Consortex Karl Doelitzsch

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

registered as a public Limited company. The company identified Consortex Karl Doelitzsch GmbH from Germany as the foreign collaborator and entered

Venkat Son of. Baburao Karle Vs. the State of MaharashtrA.

Court: Mumbai

1. These Revision Applications are tendered against judgment and award passed by the Extra Jt. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur...