Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada university act 1991 section 12 the pro chancellor Page 1 of about 15,851 results (0.891 seconds)

J.R. Ramamurthy Vs. Kannada Vishwavidyalaya, Hampi and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR2158

..... having come to the conclusion that the initiation of disciplinary enquiry proceedings by the vice-chancellor against the petitioner is contrary to the provisions of kannada university act, 1991, and having come to the conclusion that it lacks bona fides the entire proceeding require to be quashed by this court.19 ..... coming to the primary question raised in this petition with regard to the authority of the vice-chancellor to initiate disciplinary proceedings is concerned, the respondent-university has its own act known as kannada university act, 1991. ..... reading of other sub-sections clearly does not permit such an interpretation as tried to be made out by the petitioner'.in the statement of objections, the defence of the university seems to be that the vice-chancellor had initiated disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner as a consequence of decision of the syndicate based on the report of library committee, but sri reddy, the learned counsel appearing for the university vehemently contends that the vice-chancellor after initiating disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner had reported the action taken by him to the executive council, the authority who would normally ..... --(1)the vice-chancellor shall be the academic head and the principal executive officer of the university and shall in the absence of the chancellor and pro-chancellor, preside at any convocation of the university and confer degrees, diplomas or other academic distinctions upon persons entitled to receive .....

Gopal Naroune and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2009(2)JCR443(Jhr)]

..... 8929 of 1991 dated 1.10.1993 directing the vice chancellor to examine the dispute and take appropriate action of removal of the petitioners if they were working against un-sanctioned post and the same has attained finality, since the vice chancellor in compliance to the direction specifically held that the post were neither legally sanctioned nor the governing body had any authority or jurisdiction to appoint the petitioners and in any case the appointment was held to be in violation of section 35 of the then bihar universities act, 1976,15. ..... in compliance to the direction issued by the hon'ble high court on 1.10.1993 the vice-chancellor after considering the entire record by a speaking order held as under:(i) that the applicants were holding the posts which were not legally sanctioned;(ii) the appointment was in violation of section 35 of the bihar state university act. ..... even on reading the aforesaid full bench judgment it will be clear that the appointments were made against posts as per the staffing pattern within the sanctioned strength and it was in that background held as not violative of section 35 of the university act. ..... at the very outset i would like to refer section 35 of the bihar state university act as adopted by the jharkhand state university and the same is quoted as under:35. ..... section 35 of the universities act requires prior sanction of the state government for creation of posts and appointments and it applies to all affiliated colleges.9. .....

Ku. Bhagyashree D/O Bhausaheb Survey Vs. Vice Chancellor, Amravati Uni ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1994(2)BomCR32

..... as regards section 73 of the amravati university act, it may be seen that the committee constituted under sub-section (1) thereof, prepares the list from amongst the persons whose names are included in the panel prepared by the board of studies and it then sends the said names for approval to the executive council, who then appoints the examiners. ..... the submission is that the vice chancellor has no power to send the answer books on his own to the examiners of his own choice because as provided in sub-section (3) of section 73, it is only in a case where any examiner whose name is contained in the list prepared by the 73 committee, is unable to accept the examiner ship and a fresh appointment cannot be made in time by the executive council, that the vice chancellor can appoint another examiner and report such appointment to the executive council.4. ..... it is pertinent to see that even before her result of revaluation was declared, she had already preferred a writ petition in this court on 26-2-1991 challenging the re-assessment of papers made by the amravati university as hereinbefore shown. ..... the result of the revaluation was communicated to the petitioner on 26-5-1991 according to which, in two subjects, her marks were further reduced and in the third subject, the marks obtained by her were maintained. ..... after the results were declared in february 1991, the petitioner made an application for revaluation of her answer books in three subjects in which she had failed viz. .....

Book Centre and anr. Vs. Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1999Ker58

..... according to the counsel, as per section 3 of the act, the chancellor, the vice-chancellor, pro vice-chancellor, the members of senate and syndicate and academic council would constitute the mahatma gandhi university and the power of the board of studies can be exercised by the university.8. ..... as per section 3 of the mahatma gandhi university act, the chancellor, vice-chancellor, pro vice-chancellor, members of senate, syndicate and academic council, shall for the time being, constitute a body corporate by the name mahatma gandhi university. ..... the petitioners contend that the board of studies constituted under section 28 of the mahatma gandhi university act alone has the power to prescribe books for various courses under the university including pre-degrec. ..... in answer, it is contended by the standing counsel for the university that the board of studies is one constituted by the syndicate under section 28 of the act. ..... they submit that chapter xii of the mahatma gandhi university first statutes 1991 provides that the board of studies constituted by the university shall have power to recommend for guidance to teachers and students books or prescribed texts for different classes. .....

Gurukul Shikshan Sanstha and Another Vs. Eknath and Another

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... mr.a.j.gilda, learned counsel argued that section 10(1) of the caste validity act, 2000 will prevail over the maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) regulation act, 1977 and rules framed thereunder. ..... the division bench of this court held with reference to section 4(6) of the meps act read with rule 33 (1) of the meps rules that the provision is a mandatory provision. ..... chancellor , nagpur university reported in 1991 mh.l.j. ..... chancellor, nagpur university and others, 1991 mh.l.j 1487. ..... section 4(6) of the maharashtra employees of private schools (conditions of service) act, 1977 mentions thus: s. ..... the chancellor, nagpur university, 1990 mh.l.j. ..... in the ruling in the said case of vanamala .s aney, section 4(6) of the meps rules was held as mandatory and not directory. ..... accordingly, respondent no.1 had appeared for the interview and he was selected and appointed as a professor subject to probation period of two years and subject to production of physical fitness certificate obtained from the primary health center, bhatkuli, within three months and subject to approval from the district vocational education and training officer on 19.10.1991 for the post of full time teacher in junior college. ..... on sunday, 6th october, 1991. ..... on 19.10.1991, respondent no.1, with educational qualifications as m.com., b.ed. .....

Dr. Chandrashekar B. Kambara Vs. Bangalore University, Rep. by Its Reg ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2003KAR2125

..... when he was working as a reader in the university, keeping in mind the academic achievements of the petitioner in the field of kannada folklore and drama and several positions he occupied during his tenure as a reader in the university, the syndicate of the university by means of its resolution dated 5th october 1991 in exercise of the power conferred on it under sub-section (10) of section 49 of the karnataka state universities act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') resolved to appoint the petitioner as a visiting professor of the university. ..... achieved high academic distinctions and professional attainments, on the recommendation of the vice-chancellor of the university, such persons could be invited to occupy the post of a visiting professor in the university; and the same having been done in the case of the petitioner keeping in mind the high academic achievements of the petitioner which is set out by the syndicate of the university in its resolution dated 5th october 1991, a copy of which has been produced as annexure-b to this petition, it is not permissible for the university to deny the benefit of the pay-scale of the professor while settling the retirement benefits of the petitioner. .....

Tushar Kanta Nayak and ors., Etc. Vs. Utkal University and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1995Ori162; 1995(I)OLR176

..... on the case of the parties and the contentions raised on their behalf as discussed above, the questions which fall for determination are whether in the facts and circumstances it can be said, that the eligibility criteria prescribed by the university are irrational, arbitrary and unnecessary and whether the order passed by the vice-chancellor in exercise of the power under section 6(15) of the act is illegal and therefore unsustainable.6. ..... in such circumstances, if the vice-chancellor passed the order giving effect to the decision of the syndicate which is the highest decision making authority of the university, in exercise of the power vested under section 6(15) of the act, which was subsequently ratified by the academic council on 12-7-93, it cannot be said that he exercised the statutory power illegally or without due application of mind. ..... since the examination was fast approaching, the vice-chancellor of the university in purported exercise of power vested in him under section 6(15) of the orissa universities act, 1989 amended the examination regulation introducing the impugned eligibility qualifications. ..... he contended that before the vice-chancellor passed the order he had sought for the advice of post-graduate teachers of the university who had recommended in march, 1991 that 50 per cent in aggregate and 50 per cent in the honours subject should be prescribed as eligibility criteria for admission of the non-collegiate (private) candidates to . .....

Visvesvaraya Technological University, rep. by its Registrar Vs. The C ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... it is also the contention of the petitioner that under section 9 of the act, even for the state government to exercise the power to issue instructions to university, it is incumbent on the state government to first call upon the university to offer its explanation and on explanation being offered by the university, if found unsatisfactory then state government with the concurrence of the chancellor can issue instructions to the university as may be desirable and necessary for giving effect to those instructions and chancellor has no independent power to act on his own and appoint a committee to enquire into alleged irregularities even under section 9 of the act. ..... he would also elaborate his submission to contend that under section 53(2) of the act there cannot be any implied or inherent power which can be exercised by the chancellor and he would be exercising power under the act as its chancellor and not as governor of the state of karnataka; under the karnataka state universities act, 1986 and under the karnataka open universities act, 1992 the chancellor has got specific power to order for enquiry which is conspicuously absent under the vtu act and as such he prays for quashing of the impugned notification by allowing the writ petition. ..... (1991) 4 scc 54 bangalore medical trust vs. b.s. .....

Dr. Alexander Educational Foundation Vs. University of Pondicherry, Re ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1992)2MLJ97

..... (nutrition) courses from the academic year 1991-92 onwards; now, therefore, in the interest of good standards of education, the students and parents, immediate action should be taken, the vice chancellor in exercise of powers vested in him by virtue of statute 13(3) of the pondicherry university act, hereby decides not to renew the provisional affiliation in respect of b.sc. (m.l.t. ..... the vice chancellor has no such power under section 13(3) of the pondicherry university act. ..... the vice chancellor is well within his rights in having invoked section 3(3) of the act, in view of the necessity for taking immediate action, since otherwise, the petitioner would admit new students for the current academic year and place them in difficulties. ..... the said section 13(3) no doubt says 'the vice chancellor may, if he is of opinion that immediate action is necessary on any matter exercise any power conferred on any authority of the university by or under this act and shall report to such authority the action taken by him on such matter'. ..... then, the other submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned orders could not have been passed by the vice chancellor under section 13(3) of the said act, is also not correct. ..... the second proviso of section 13(3) cannot limit the scope or ambit of the wide expression 'any matter' used in the main part of section 13(3). .....

Smt. Shyama Roy and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... in that sense, the statutory right exercised by the vice chancellor of vinoba bhave university in issuing transfer order under section 10(14) of the act cannot be interfered with by the state government.7. mr. v. ..... if that be not done by the state government, then the vice chancellor, vinoba bhave university, hazaribagh, shall be at liberty to exercise power under section 10(14) of the act. ..... 1024 of 1993 (r) that the executive instruction made by the government cannot takes away the unfattered right of the vice chancellor exercised under section 10(14) of the act.6. ..... 3) under section 10(14) of the bihar universities act, 1976, (the act) cannot be thwarted by any government circular or letter and, as such, the respondent no. ..... much stress has been given in the word 'constrained' as mentioned in annexure-6 and thereby submit that practically the vice chancellor was interested very much for transfer/deputation of the petitioners to various other colleges for the basic need of proper education to make equilibrium to all constituent colleges under the university, but because of the government letter at annexure-5, the vice chancellor, vinoba bhave university (respondent no. ..... 1720 of 1991 (r), a copy whereof has been annexed as annexure c to the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. ..... 1 the other hand by giving reply to the counter-affidavit, the petitioners have submitted that this court has already held by order dated 22.11.1991 passed in c.w.j.c. no. .....