Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... the aforesaid circular is further required to be looked into in reference to section 22 of the ugc act of 1956 because a deemed to be university can provide degree as defined under sub- section (3) of section 22 of the ugc act. ..... to consult rajasthan medical science & health university in this regard, therefore, the medical & health department of government of rajatshan, could not reject the candidature of the petitioner on this ground that the petitioner/s are not holding the requisite diploma of 9 months as required in the advertisement on the ground that said dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner is not recognized by the state government, particularly, in view of the fact that the commissioner, college education vide the communication (annex.6) dated 10.10.2006 had himself given the administrative sanction to dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991, wherein the learned single judge of this court dealing with a course of b. ed. ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991 and the division bench decision in the case of state of rajasthan & ors. vs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... the aforesaid circular is further required to be looked into in reference to section 22 of the ugc act of 1956 because a deemed to be university can provide degree as defined under sub- section (3) of section 22 of the ugc act. ..... to consult rajasthan medical science & health university in this regard, therefore, the medical & health department of government of rajatshan, could not reject the candidature of the petitioner on this ground that the petitioner/s are not holding the requisite diploma of 9 months as required in the advertisement on the ground that said dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner is not recognized by the state government, particularly, in view of the fact that the commissioner, college education vide the communication (annex.6) dated 10.10.2006 had himself given the administrative sanction to dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991, wherein the learned single judge of this court dealing with a course of b. ed. ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991 and the division bench decision in the case of state of rajasthan & ors. vs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... the aforesaid circular is further required to be looked into in reference to section 22 of the ugc act of 1956 because a deemed to be university can provide degree as defined under sub- section (3) of section 22 of the ugc act. ..... to consult rajasthan medical science & health university in this regard, therefore, the medical & health department of government of rajatshan, could not reject the candidature of the petitioner on this ground that the petitioner/s are not holding the requisite diploma of 9 months as required in the advertisement on the ground that said dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner is not recognized by the state government, particularly, in view of the fact that the commissioner, college education vide the communication (annex.6) dated 10.10.2006 had himself given the administrative sanction to dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991, wherein the learned single judge of this court dealing with a course of b. ed. ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991 and the division bench decision in the case of state of rajasthan & ors. vs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... the aforesaid circular is further required to be looked into in reference to section 22 of the ugc act of 1956 because a deemed to be university can provide degree as defined under sub- section (3) of section 22 of the ugc act. ..... to consult rajasthan medical science & health university in this regard, therefore, the medical & health department of government of rajatshan, could not reject the candidature of the petitioner on this ground that the petitioner/s are not holding the requisite diploma of 9 months as required in the advertisement on the ground that said dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner is not recognized by the state government, particularly, in view of the fact that the commissioner, college education vide the communication (annex.6) dated 10.10.2006 had himself given the administrative sanction to dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991, wherein the learned single judge of this court dealing with a course of b. ed. ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991 and the division bench decision in the case of state of rajasthan & ors. vs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... the aforesaid circular is further required to be looked into in reference to section 22 of the ugc act of 1956 because a deemed to be university can provide degree as defined under sub- section (3) of section 22 of the ugc act. ..... to consult rajasthan medical science & health university in this regard, therefore, the medical & health department of government of rajatshan, could not reject the candidature of the petitioner on this ground that the petitioner/s are not holding the requisite diploma of 9 months as required in the advertisement on the ground that said dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner is not recognized by the state government, particularly, in view of the fact that the commissioner, college education vide the communication (annex.6) dated 10.10.2006 had himself given the administrative sanction to dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991, wherein the learned single judge of this court dealing with a course of b. ed. ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991 and the division bench decision in the case of state of rajasthan & ors. vs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... the aforesaid circular is further required to be looked into in reference to section 22 of the ugc act of 1956 because a deemed to be university can provide degree as defined under sub- section (3) of section 22 of the ugc act. ..... to consult rajasthan medical science & health university in this regard, therefore, the medical & health department of government of rajatshan, could not reject the candidature of the petitioner on this ground that the petitioner/s are not holding the requisite diploma of 9 months as required in the advertisement on the ground that said dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner is not recognized by the state government, particularly, in view of the fact that the commissioner, college education vide the communication (annex.6) dated 10.10.2006 had himself given the administrative sanction to dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991, wherein the learned single judge of this court dealing with a course of b. ed. ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991 and the division bench decision in the case of state of rajasthan & ors. vs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... the aforesaid circular is further required to be looked into in reference to section 22 of the ugc act of 1956 because a deemed to be university can provide degree as defined under sub- section (3) of section 22 of the ugc act. ..... to consult rajasthan medical science & health university in this regard, therefore, the medical & health department of government of rajatshan, could not reject the candidature of the petitioner on this ground that the petitioner/s are not holding the requisite diploma of 9 months as required in the advertisement on the ground that said dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner is not recognized by the state government, particularly, in view of the fact that the commissioner, college education vide the communication (annex.6) dated 10.10.2006 had himself given the administrative sanction to dungar mahavidhyalaya, bikaner ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991, wherein the learned single judge of this court dealing with a course of b. ed. ..... (sbcwp no.2502/1989) decided on 21.02.1991 and the division bench decision in the case of state of rajasthan & ors. vs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
..... 2011 (3) scale 654 has observed ; also, it is to be noted that the revisional powers of the national commission are derived from section 21 (b) of the act, under which the said power can be exercised only if there is some prima facie jurisdictional error appearing in the impugned order, and only then, may the same be set aside. ..... thus, no jurisdiction or legal error has been shown to us to call for interference in the exercise of power under section 21 (b) of the act, since two fora below have given cogent reasons in their order, which does not call for any interference nor they suffer from any infirmity or revisional exercise of jurisdiction. 21. ..... in this view of the matter, we are of the considered opinion that the jurisdiction conferred on the national commission under section 21 (b) of the act has been transgressed. ..... we are issuing this direction keeping in mind the interest of the students and also sections 33 and 34 of the act, which contemplate dissolution of the sponsoring body and liquidation of university whereunder responsibility, has to be assumed by the state government. ..... hence, the appellants are definitely guilty of unfair trade practice as well within the ambit of sub-section (1) (r) of section 2 of the consumer protection act, 1986. 9. ..... f.73-64/2003/he38, issued on 30.5.2003 under sub-section (1) of section 5 of the act. ..... present revision petitions have been filed under section 21(b) of the consumer protection act,1986. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : UK Supreme Court
..... indirect discrimination an examination of the question whether the application of the oversubscription policy to m amounted to indirect discrimination within the meaning of section 1(1a) of the race relations act 1976 falls into two parts: (1) did the policy put persons of the same race or ethnic or national origins as m at a particular disadvantage when compared with other persons: section 1(1a)(a) and (b); and, if so, (2) can jfs show that the policy was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim: section 1(1a)(c). ..... belief as providing no justification for it at all; see also bob jones university v united states, 461 us 574 (1983), where the us supreme court upheld the decision of the inland revenue service to revoke the university's tax exempt status because, while permitting unmarried people who were black to enrol as students, it had adopted a racially discriminatory policy of denying admission to applicants engaged in an interracial marriage or known to advocate interracial marriage or dating although it ..... he put it thus at page 772b-g: "i turn to that part of the vice-chancellor's reasoning which is based upon the wording of section 1(1)(a). ..... this has now been changed so that these are pro-rated with children who have attended a non-jewish primary school. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
..... learned counsel for the petitioner in support of the aforementioned prayer has submitted that the nomination of respondent no.9 as a member of search committee for appointment on the post of vice chancellor and pro vice chancellor of kameshwar singh darbhanga sanskrit university (hereinafter referred to as the university) is bad because he is connected as a member of senate of the university and thus, disqualified in view of section 10(1)(ii) of the bihar state universities act (hereinafter referred to as the act). ..... for issuance of an appropriate writ directing the respondents to make appointment on the post of vice chancellor/ pro vice chancellor of kameshwar singh darbhanga sanskrit university on the basis of recommendation of panels of names by constituting a search committee in accordance with section 19(1)(ii) of the bihar state university act, 1976.? 3. ..... in the search committee for recommending panels of names for the post of vice chancellor and pro-vice chancellor of kameshwar singh darbhanga sanskrit university to be wholly in teeth of the amended section 10(1)(ii) and 12 of the bihar state university act, 1976. d. .....
Tag this Judgment!