Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada university act 1991 section 12 the pro chancellor Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 242 results (0.120 seconds)

Registrar, Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya, Vice C ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008BusLR154(NULL)

..... section 3 of the adhiniyam though provides that in all the suits and other legal proceedings by or against the university, the pleading shall be signed and verified by the registrar who is the appropriate authority to whom notice of the proceedings is to be issued and served but does not provide exclusive jurisdiction of the satna court in respect of the legal proceedings by or against the university. ..... at this juncture, i would like to refer certain provisions of the act which reads as under:section 3:-incorporation of the university:-(1) there shall be established a university by the name of the mahtma gandhi chitrakoot gramodaya vishwavidhyalaya which shall be consist of a chancellor, a vice chancellor, a pro-vice chancellor, a board of management, an academic council and other authorities and officers as provided in this act or statutes. ..... under the chitrakoot gramodaya vishwan vidyalaya adhiniyam, 1991 and the headquarter of the university is situated in the district of satna. ..... apart from this,chitrakoot vishwavidyalaya is constituted under the mahatma gandhi (chitrakoot) gramodaya vishwa vidhyalaya adhiniyam, 1991 (hereinafter referred to as 'adhiniyam') and under section 3(5) of the act, the headquarters of the university is at chitrakut, district satna, m.p. ..... in these circumstances, so far as territorial jurisdiction is concerned, the petitioners do not get any benefit of the provisions of the adhiniyam of 1991. 8. .....

Suresh Chandra MaThe Vs. Jiwaji University and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1994)IILLJ462MP; 1993(0)MPLJ805

..... secondly, the view was also that since teachers did not come within the purview of the expression 'workman' under sections 2(s), the predominant activity of the university, namely, education carried on with the co-operation of teachers, could not be said to fall within the field of industry. ..... it is therefore clear that education is a kind of service, although sublime service, and that university is an 'industry' within the meaning of section 2(j) of the industrial disputes act, 1947. ..... only subordinate staff in the university could be held to be workmen but that constituted a minor and insignificant section of the university. ..... , sub-clause (bb) in relation to the main provision of clause (oo) of section 2 of the industrial disputes act, 1947, would swallow the main provision itself. ..... this takes us to the second ground of challenge, which is that the impugned termination was 'retrenchment' not fulfilling essential pre- requisites mentioned in section 25-f of the industrial disputes act, 1947 and was therefore void ab initio or non est. ..... pausing here it may be mentioned that a new definition of 'industry' has been given by act 46 of 1982 whereby a new clause (i) will take the place of clause (j), from a date to be notified upon enforcement of section 2(c) of the act. ..... but even such termination comes within the ambit of 'retrenchment' as defined in section 2(oo) of the industrial disputes act, 1947. ..... the definition of 'industry' is given in section 2(j) of the act. .....

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya and ors. Vs. State of M.P. ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2002MP196; 2002(2)MPHT353

..... the following powers, namely-- (a) to approve the appointment of chancellor;(b) to issue directions to do anything required to be done by the university under the provisions of this act, rules, the statutes, or the ordinances made thereunder or to rectify any violation thereof;(c) to adjudicate disputes under this act between the university, the commission or any other expert body and to issue directions to comply with its decisions on such disputes;(d) to order framing of statutes under section 24 on particular subjects;(e) to generally issue such orders as may be required to be followed by the university under this act or any other law for the ..... the university has been included in the list of universities, maintained by the ugc under section 2(f) of the ugc act, 1956.the above university has, however, not been declared fit to receive central assistance in terms of rules framed under section 12-b of the act, 1956. ..... we have bestowed our anxious consideration to the pros and cons of the submissions. ..... collector, central excise, air 1991 sc 754, wherein the apex court came to hold that when there is some doubt the words must take colour by making a reference to the meaning of the words associated with it. ..... pro-vice chancellor of the university assured that the university is committed to adhere to rules but the assurance was not fulfilled. .....

Sehore Sharirik Shiksha ChhatrA. Vs. Barkatullah University, Bhopal an ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

..... this court, in series of decisions, after interpreting the provisions of the ncte act and the regulations framed thereunder and the rules of the university for the purpose of grant of affiliation, has held that no educational institution can admit the students without recognition of the ncte and affiliation from the university. ..... "that in w.p.8449 of 2009, by order dated 20.10.2009, the high court passed following orders :- invoking the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this court under article 226 of the constitution of india, the petitioner has prayed for issue of a direction to the respondent university to explain why the examination for the students of the petitioner college have not been conducted for b.p.ed. ..... after the counter affidavits were filed by the respondent university as well as by the national council for teacher education, (ncte) and looking to the stand and stance put forth in the petition and the stand taken by the respondents, this court on 22.9.2009 had passed the following order:-"the petitioner 'sri satya sai college physical education, sehore' (run by maa vaishnav education society with an aim to establish and run b.p.ed. ..... the grievance of the petitioner college is that despite the same, the university, which is under an obligation to conduct the examination, has not conducted the examination of the students of the petitioner college for the b.p.ed. .....

Dr. Kunal Kanti Majee Vs. the Chancellor, Rani Durgawati Vishvavidyala ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(4)MPHT268; 2008(1)MPLJ577

..... the chancellor without considering the decision taken by the executive council taken on 8-5-2005 and the affirmation thereof on 10-6-2005 issued order under section 12(4) of the act on 11-12-2006 annulling the decisions of the executive council dated 8-5-2000 and affirmation thereof dated 10-6-2005 and directed the respondent university to cancel the appointment of the appellant with immediate effect and discharge him by giving him either notice or salary in lieu thereof. ..... we are, therefore, of the opinion that the passing of the interim order dated february 21, 1991 by the delhi high court staying the operation of the order of the appellate authority dated january 7, 1991 does not have the effect of reviving the appeal which had been dismissed by the appellate authority by its order dated january 7, 1991 and it cannot be said that after february 21, 1991, the said appeal stood revived and was pending before the appellate authority. ..... in that view of the matter, it cannot be said that any proceedings under the act were pending before the board or the appellate authority on the date of the passing of the order dated august 14, 1991 by the learned single judge of the karnataka high court for winding up of the company or on november 6, 1991 when the division bench passed the order dismissing osa no. ..... 16 of 1991 filed by the appellant company against the order of the learned single judge dated august 14, 1991. .....

K.P. Govil Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Jabalpur and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1987MPLJ396

..... the respondents say that the petition is not maintainable at gwalior, because as per the presidential order dated 28-11-1968 issued under section 51(2), states reorganisation act, 1956, the gwalior bench has jurisdiction and power only in respect of the cases arising in the revenue districts of gwalior, shivpuri, datia, guna, vidisha, bhind and morena and because neither the impugned order of the university was passed at gwalior, nor any part of the cause of action could be said to have arisen in any of the revenue districts falling within the jurisdiction ..... of gwalior bench of the .....

Rameshchandra Vs. G.N. Tandon and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1974MP1; 1973MPLJ819

..... in accordance with the said programme, the petitioner who was desirous of contesting the election to the university court as a representative to be elected by the registered graduates of the university from among themselves under clause (21) to section 19(1) of the indore university act, 1963 (hereinafter called the act) submitted his nomination paper duly proposed and seconded as required by the relevant provisions of the ordinance. ..... lastly it has to be borne in mind that the court of university itself is an electoral college for the election of three persons elected by a single transferable vote by the court from amongst its members, at least two of whom shall be from amongst the registered graduates elected to the court under clause (xxi) of sub-section (1) of section 19, according to the provision made in section 22 (1) (iv) of the act. ..... the learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 stressed the difference in language used in explanation to section 19 (1) and the proviso to section 22 of the act and contended that as the words 'salaried employee' had been employed in the proviso to section 22 and only word 'employee' was used in the explanation, it was evident that the enacting authority intended to include and connote even the unsalaried employees within the explanation. ..... 1 of university of indore read with the explanation to section 19 (1) of the act.' 5. .....

Kumari Anjana Mishra and anr. Vs. Principal, K.M. Rustogi, M.L.B. Coll ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1990MP120

..... we hold that the power of the university under the adhiniyam, in view of the provisions of sub-sections (17), (20) and (36) of section 6 of the adhiniyam read with section 35(j) and section 37, clauses (i) and (iii), is not affected, indented or impaired in any manner by any of the provisions of the advocates act. ..... power to conduct, co-ordinate, regulate and control teaching and research work in the colleges and the institutions, recognised by the university is contemplatedin sub-section (17), while under sub-section (20), the university is required to 'promote with special care the educational interest of the weaker sections of the people and in particular of the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes'. ..... the proviso indeed, is an enabling provision and the proviso does not disable the university to exercise its power under sub-sections (17), (20) and (36) of section 6 of the adhiniyam.21. ..... section 6(1) empowers eachuniversity to 'provide for instruction in suchbranches of learning as the university may,from time to time determine and to makeprovision for research and for the advancement and dissemination of knowledge'.under sub-section (10), a university is empowered to 'grant subject to such conditionsas the university may determine, diplomas orcertificates and confer degrees and otheracademic distinctions on the basis of examinations, evaluation or any other method,of testing'. .....

Dr. S.C. Barat and anr. Vs. Hari Vinayak Pataskar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1962MP180

..... in clause (1) no words to limit the protection given by that clause to the exercise and performance of the powers and duties under the constitution of his office by the governor or to acts done in the exercise of those powers.it was said that section 9 of the jabalpur university act made the governor the chancellor of the university by virtue of his office as governor and the powers which the act conferred on the chancellor were thus the powers conferred on the governor; and that, therefore, under clause (1) of article 361 the chancellor of the university was not answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties ..... it is noteworthy that section 10(1) of the act uses a different language in connection with the office of the pro-chancellor, it says that the minister of education shall ex-officio be the pro-chancellor. ..... whereas under section 9(1) it is the prestige and personality of the person filling the office of the governor that is made the basis of his appointment as chancellor, under section 10(1) it is the office itself that is made the criterion for the appointment of the minister of education as the pro-chancellor.the distinction between these two modes of appointment is a real one. .....

Umashankar Shukla Vs. Arts and Commerce College (by B.R. Anand, Chairm ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1969)ILLJ86MP; 1968MPLJ604

..... section 15 thereof, which corresponds to section 16 of the general clauses act, 1958, when read along with the definition contained in section 2(30) applies to construction of a madhya pradesh act enacted before 1 november 1956 ; but there is nothing in the act to make section 15 applicable for construing an ordinance made by the university under the university of saugar act, 1946. ..... this general principle is illustrated by the provision in section 16 of the general clauses act, 10 of 1897 which lays down that where any central act or regulation gives power of appointment, that includes the power to suspend or dismiss unless a different intention appears, though this provision does not directly apply in the present case, it is in consonance with the general law of master and servant. ..... the effect of the provision is that the governing body of a college can with previous approval of the vice-chancellor take disciplinary action against a principal. ..... the only provision in the code to which our attention is drawn is clause 9(iv) which reads as follows ;no disciplinary action of any kind shall be taken against the principal of a college by its governing body without previous approval of the vice-chancellor.the aforesaid provision neither expressly nor impliedly provides for suspension without; pay. ..... after the petitioner gave the explanation, the vice-chancellor. .....