Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Page 8 of about 13,477 results (0.230 seconds)

Waf Alalaulad and Another Vs. M/S. Sundardas Daulatram and Sons and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All355

..... sri suresh kumar yadav, who was manager and agent of the tenants. if sri yadav has, by handing over possession of the property to the owners, acted beyond the authority given to him by his employer, it is the matter between him and his employer and it cannot be said to tae a case of property grabbing ..... v. narayan khimalal totama : air1990sc630 the supreme court has held that a 'reasonable residence' for a man being a 'necessity for fulfilling constitutional goal in the matter of development of man', is included in 'life' in article 21 of the constitution. in unnikrishnan v. state of andhra pradesh : [1993]1scr594 the supreme court has reiterated that ..... , p. sahi : air1959sc951 . in the -words and phrases' permanent edition. vol. 33 at p. 99, it is stated that parens patriae is the inherent porfer and authority of a legislature to provide protection to the person and properly of persons non suijuris, such as minor, insan, and incompetent persons, but the words 'parens pairiae' meaning thereby .....

Lcs City Makers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

..... and consequently would not attract service tax. further, if the ultimate owner enters into a contract for construction of a residential complex with a promoter / builder / developer, who himself provides service of design, planning and construction; and after such construction the ultimate owner receives such property for his personal use, then such activity ..... of residential complex was brought under service tax w.e.f.01.06.2005, doubts have arisen regarding the applicability of service tax in a case where developer / builder/promoter enters into an agreement, with the ultimate owner for selling a dwelling unit in a residential complex at any stage of construction (or even ..... to be a residential complex within the definition under section 65 (91a) of finance act, 1994. 18.2. the counsel also submits that the entire matter regarding kamakotivilasam project was brought to the notice of the departmental authorities vide letter dt. 23.12.2005. in fact, this letter was in the context of .....

Anoop Baranwal Vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Law And Justice Secretar ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... cri) 734]. , union carbide corpn. v. union of india [(1991) 4 scc584 , delhi judicial service assn. v. state of gujarat [(1991) 4 scc406 (nadiad case), delhi development authority v. skipper construction co. (p) ltd. [(1996) 4 scc622 and dinesh trivedi, m.p. v. union of india [(1997) 4 scc306 guidelines were laid down having the effect ..... article 32 read with article 142 to make orders which have the effect of law by virtue of article 141 and there is mandate to all authorities to act in aid of the orders of this court as provided in article 144 of the constitution. in a catena of decisions of this court, this ..... the legislative or administrative fields almost inevitably voters, legislators and other elected officials will conclude that the activities of judges should be closely monitored. if judges act like legislators or administrators it follows that judges should be elected like legislators or selected and trained like administrators. this would be counterproductive. the touchstone of .....

Jagroop Singh Gill and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1995P& H303; (1995)110PLR347

..... the petitioners that there is total non-application of mind and there is no justification for the respondents to exercise their authority under proviso to sub-section (3) of section 238 of the act. the relevant portion of the impugned notification, read as follows:---'(a) the municipal committee has failed to implement the ..... the present case there is nothing on record to show that the competent authority applied its mind and recorded its satisfaction for valid and good reasons for invoking the powers vested in it under the said proviso.12. in the recent development of law by judicial pronouncements, the parameters of judicial review of orders ..... not give any definite details or particulars of the alleged violations, and the respondents have neither averred nor shown any record to us where the concerned authority has recorded its satisfaction on the circumstances and reasons for not providing adequate opportunity to the committee or the petitioners before issuing the notification.15. in .....

Dlf Universal Ltd. Vs. Greater Kailash Ii Welfare Association

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 127(2006)DLT131; 2006(88)DRJ44

..... 12(2) & 12(3) of the delhi development act, 1957 which states:-(2) save as otherwise provided in this act, the authority shall not undertake or carry out any development of land in any area which is not a development area. (3) after the commencement of this act no development of land shall be undertaken or carried out in ..... accordance with the provisions of the regulations relating to the grant of permission for development made under the delhi (control of building operations ) act, 1955 (53 of 1955), and in force immediately before the commencement of this act:provided that the local authority concerned may (subject to the provisions of section 53a) amend those regulations in ..... written permission of the dda is essential. section 12(3)(ii) of the act makes it clear that for development in an area other than a development area, only the prior written approval or sanction of the local authority regulating the development of such other area is required. in our opinion, there is no requirement .....

Gem Granites Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT899

..... on either side at length and also examined the decisions cited at the bar. meaning of the words 'royalty' and 'dead rent' occurring in the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 has been elaborately considered by the apex court in state of h.p. v. gujarat ambuja cement ltd. and anr. (2005) 6 scc 499 and hence requires no ..... r 1994 (3) madras 41.5. senior government pleader sri t.r. ravi on the other hand contended that section 9 of the kerala mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 read with rule 15(3) of the rules framed thereunder makes the petitioner liable to pay either royalty or dead rent. counsel submitted that dead rent is envisaged to ..... regulation) act, 1957 and is violative of article 14 of the constitution of india in so far as it is made applicable to patta land. petitioner has also sought a declaration that clause 22 of the lease deed dated 29.05.1996 is illegal and without the authority of law and also for a writ of certiorari to quash the .....

Soverign Developers And Vs. The Assistant Director

Court : Karnataka

..... nath mathur and others. vii) (2015) 16 scc1 gautam kundu vs. directorate of enforcement (prevention of money-laundering act) government of india through manoj kumar, assistant director, eastern region. viii) (1996) 4 scc622 delhi development authority vs. skipper construction co. (p) ltd. and another. ix) 2014 air scw2550 ram builders vs. state of ..... . employees (in ca no.143 of1959 and another. xiv) ilr2015kar3609 bangalore development authority, by its secretary vs. smt. venkata ratnamma and others. xv) laws(mad)-2012-7-39: indian bank represented by its chief manager,. palpap ichinichi software ..... vice- chancellor and others. x) ilr2015kar1825 bangalore turf club limited vs. union of india, ministry of finance and others. 60 xi) (1994) 1 scc243 lucknow development authority vs. m.k. gupta. xii) (2006) 1 scc275 state of orissa and others vs. md. illiyas. xiii) air1960sc675 corporation of the city of nagpur vs .....

M Gopi Vs. The Joint Director

Court : Karnataka

..... nath mathur and others. vii) (2015) 16 scc1 gautam kundu vs. directorate of enforcement (prevention of money-laundering act) government of india through manoj kumar, assistant director, eastern region. viii) (1996) 4 scc622 delhi development authority vs. skipper construction co. (p) ltd. and another. ix) 2014 air scw2550 ram builders vs. state of ..... . employees (in ca no.143 of1959 and another. xiv) ilr2015kar3609 bangalore development authority, by its secretary vs. smt. venkata ratnamma and others. xv) laws(mad)-2012-7-39: indian bank represented by its chief manager,. palpap ichinichi software ..... vice- chancellor and others. x) ilr2015kar1825 bangalore turf club limited vs. union of india, ministry of finance and others. 60 xi) (1994) 1 scc243 lucknow development authority vs. m.k. gupta. xii) (2006) 1 scc275 state of orissa and others vs. md. illiyas. xiii) air1960sc675 corporation of the city of nagpur vs .....

Mr Dyani Antony Paul Vs. Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... nath mathur and others. vii) (2015) 16 scc1 gautam kundu vs. directorate of enforcement (prevention of money-laundering act) government of india through manoj kumar, assistant director, eastern region. viii) (1996) 4 scc622 delhi development authority vs. skipper construction co. (p) ltd. and another. ix) 2014 air scw2550 ram builders vs. state of ..... . employees (in ca no.143 of1959 and another. xiv) ilr2015kar3609 bangalore development authority, by its secretary vs. smt. venkata ratnamma and others. xv) laws(mad)-2012-7-39: indian bank represented by its chief manager,. palpap ichinichi software ..... vice- chancellor and others. x) ilr2015kar1825 bangalore turf club limited vs. union of india, ministry of finance and others. 60 xi) (1994) 1 scc243 lucknow development authority vs. m.k. gupta. xii) (2006) 1 scc275 state of orissa and others vs. md. illiyas. xiii) air1960sc675 corporation of the city of nagpur vs .....

Sri S Thimmaraju Vs. The Assistant Director

Court : Karnataka

..... nath mathur and others. vii) (2015) 16 scc1 gautam kundu vs. directorate of enforcement (prevention of money-laundering act) government of india through manoj kumar, assistant director, eastern region. viii) (1996) 4 scc622 delhi development authority vs. skipper construction co. (p) ltd. and another. ix) 2014 air scw2550 ram builders vs. state of ..... . employees (in ca no.143 of1959 and another. xiv) ilr2015kar3609 bangalore development authority, by its secretary vs. smt. venkata ratnamma and others. xv) laws(mad)-2012-7-39: indian bank represented by its chief manager,. palpap ichinichi software ..... vice- chancellor and others. x) ilr2015kar1825 bangalore turf club limited vs. union of india, ministry of finance and others. 60 xi) (1994) 1 scc243 lucknow development authority vs. m.k. gupta. xii) (2006) 1 scc275 state of orissa and others vs. md. illiyas. xiii) air1960sc675 corporation of the city of nagpur vs .....