Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Court: orissa Page 1 of about 137 results (0.093 seconds)

Nov 17 2008 (HC)

Utkal Christian Council Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2009(1)OLR133

..... commission had accepted the engagement on contract basis as a chairman of the assessment board in recruitment and assessment centre (rac) of defence research & development organisation (drdo). the court held that bar under article 319(c) of the constitution prohibits this kind of engagement even on contract basis under ..... such constitutional requirements vitiate the selection process itself and render it to nullity. (vide b.s. minhas v. indian statistical institute and ors. : (1984)illj67sc ; delhi development horticulture employees' union v. delhi administration and ors. : (1992)iillj452sc ; state of haryana v. piara singh : (1993)iillj937sc ; prem singh and ors. v. ..... being ineligible for further employment under the state government or for any other employment under in any such local authority, corporation, government company or society registered under the societies registration act, 1860.30. in view of the above prayer made by the appellant and in consequence of the disqualification .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2013 (HC)

Praxair India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sub-collector and Sub-divisional Magistrat ...

Court : Orissa

..... further seen that form-iii of the regulations is the specimen of the application for drawing of attention under sub-section (7) of section 16 of the orissa development authorities act, 1982. the petitioner has sent the said notice in the prescribed format and it also appears from annexure-9 at page 48 that the document has been sent ..... prayed for a direction to the opposite parties to accept the status of deemed grant of permission under section 16(8) of the orissa development authorities act, 1982 (hereinafter 2 referred to as the act .) and further to direct the opposite parties not to interfere with the petitioner s lawful activities at the pump fill station set up at ..... are hereby quashed. the opposite parties are directed to accept the status of the petitioner as having granted deemed permission under section 16(8) of the orissa development authorities act, 1982. . s.k.mishra, j.pradip mohanty, a.c.j.i agree. .. pradip mohanty, a.c.j.orissa high court, cuttack, dated, january 29, 2013 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 21 2009 (HC)

Biranchi Narayan Das and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 108(2009)CLT397

..... mentioned that any person who is injuriously affected by the above scheme being entitled to claim damages in accordance with section 65 of the orissa development authorities act, 1982 should details of the claim to the valuation officer within 3 months of the date of publication of this notification with supporting documents & ..... officer (p-241/c) stipulated that any injuriously affected person can communicate his claim for damages under section 65 of orissa development authorities act, 1982. but section 65 of oda act placed below stipulates tor determination of compensation in terms of value of the tend. it does not provide in any manner ..... taken in course of implementation of town planning scheme no. ii.2. the bhubaneswar development authority had prepared town planning scheme no. 2 for nayapalli (north) in exercise of powers conferred under chapter vi of the orissa development authorities act, 1982. para-4 of the scheme made provision for adequate road network, infrastructural facilities .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2005 (HC)

Radhaballav Mohanty Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 100(2005)CLT527; 2005(I)OLR507

..... petitioner had filed ojc no. 7646 of 1998 before this court challenging the action taken by opposite party no. 2, puri-konark development authority, under section 91 of the orissa development authority act for demolition of a building constructed by him without obtaining due permission and/or sanction of plan, and also violating the provisions of ..... to the notice of the court that the construction was made without obtaining prior permission and/or had been made beyond the norms of the development authority act and that it grossly violated the provisions made in the coastal zone regulations. it was further alleged that under the cover of the interim order ..... court may take a liberal view and condone the delay in order to give substantial justice.3. on receiving notice, opposite party no. 2, puri-konark development authority, entered appearance through its counsel and filed a counter-affidavit opposing the prayer for condonation of delay.4. mr. patnaik, learned senior advocate appearing for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2008 (HC)

National Aluminium Company Limited and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and or ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2008(1)OLR443; (2008)15VST296(Orissa)

..... intra-state trade and commerce for providing various trading facilities to the trading community of different statutes like the orissa development authority act, 1982, orissa municipal corporation act, orissa municipal act, orissa zilla parishad act, orissa panchayat samiti act, gram panchayat act. under the above mentioned statutes, provisions of the establishment of market place, shopping complex, village market, hata, ..... india is made exclusively to pass any legislation to augment the income of the local authorities and by the definition of 'local area' given in the act, the entire state has been brought under the purview of the act and hence it is a colourable exercise of power.3. after hearing learned counsel ..... in section 36, it has been indicated that there shall be paid to each local authority every year such sum as may be determined by the state government from out of the tax collected under this act, subject to such conditions and in such manner as may be prescribed. but nothing has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2009 (HC)

Gobinda Chandra Sahoo and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 108(2009)CLT96

..... 12.10.1999. petitioners raised construction on the said land without getting the plan sanctioned from the bhubaneswar development authority as required under the provisions of the orissa development authorities act, 1982. thus, there is an order for demolition of the construction. hence the petitioners have challenged the ..... land acquisition proceedings.3. mr. a.c. mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioners has raised large number of issues challenging the land acquisition proceedings including that there was no opportunity to file objections as required under section 5a of the act ..... compensation since he steps into the shoes of the erstwhile owner and may merely claim compensation.10. however, in subsequent judgment in jaipur development authority v. mahavir housing coop. society, jaipur and ors. : (1996) 11 scc 229, the apex court, though did not decide .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 1997 (HC)

Parameswar Mohanty Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 86(1998)CLT170; 1997(II)OLR444

..... encroachment as aforesaid, does not or is not likely to prejudice or adversely affect - (i) any development scheme, programme or work specified by general or special order made in that behalf by the state government or the prescribed authority ; or (ii) the interests of the general public or of the village community.' 11. all ..... site, whether or not recorded as such in the record-of-rights; (iii) likely to be required for any development scheme and are declared as such in the manner prescribed by rules made under this act by the state government by a notification; (c) lands unauthorisedly occupied by persons, who had once before been ..... the revenue administration of a district and shall include an additional district magistrate ; (b) 'prescribed' means prescribed by rules made by the state/ government under this act; and (c) 'tahasildar' means the chief officer in charge of the revenue administration of a tahasil and shall include an additional tahasildar.'later definition of certain other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2010 (HC)

M/S.Ortel Communications Ltd. Vs. Mr.K.Raghuramaya and anr.

Court : Orissa

..... contempt.7. mr. rao, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 placed reliance on a judgment of the high court of karnataka in the case of banglore development authority v. gururaj s/o. late m.s. prithviraj and b.v.ram murthy, reported in ilr (2007) kar 5184, in support of his contention that, the ..... as serious contempts. similarly, deceiving the court or the court's officers by deliberately suppressing a fact, or giving false facts, may be a punishable contempt. certain acts of a lesser nature may also constitute an abuse or process as, for instance, initiating or carrying on proceedings which are wanting in bona fides or which are frivolous ..... 's writ application had been dismissed, yet the petitioner went ahead and filed a contempt application, interalia, on the allegation that the paradeep port trust have not acted in terms of the observations made in paragraph-14 of the judgment by this court. the aforesaid allegation raised while being wholly incorrect, the direction of this court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1983 (HC)

Laxmi Narayan Agarwalla and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Orissa and ors. Etc ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1983Ori210

..... either the extraction of the mineral or on the mineral right.......'their lordships held that the central act of 1957 did not denude the state legislature of its power to impose cess.in western coalfields ltd. v. special area development authority, korba, air 1982 sc 697, the controversy was whether property tax could be imposed on ..... the lands and buildings which were used for the purpose of mining operations and were covered by coal mines. it was urged therein that when by virtue of the declaration in section 2 of the central act of ..... 3. the petitioners hold mining leases granted by the state of orissa under the provisions of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act of 1987 (central act 67 of 1957) (hereinafter called 'the central act of 1957') read with the mineral concession rules, 1960 and are carrying on mining operations.4. mr. govind das, the learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2012 (HC)

Tapan Kumar Das Vs. Commissioner, Cuttack Municipal Corporation and Ot

Court : Orissa

..... in cuttack city, the tahasildar, cuttack may be allowed to change the classification after detailed field enquiry. it has been reported by the cuttack development authority that 482 cases of unauthorized construction over jalasaya kissam of land have been detected by them and 165 number of unauthorized construction cases have been booked ..... water logged areas available at present as per 2006 satellite report are under detailed verification by the tahasildar, cuttack. the swampy water logged areas also act as storage for rainwater and also help in recharging ground water. hence, these areas should also be protected for future irrespective of their classification. the ..... that all the tanks/ water-bodies available physically in cuttack city should be preserved for future use irrespective of their classification as the water-bodies act as rainwater storage during heavy rainfall. they also help in recharging ground water on which entire cuttack city depends for drinking water purpose. the swampy .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //