Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 422 results (0.135 seconds)

Feb 08 2006 (HC)

Molahey and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2644

..... recommendations of the technical committee but at the time of finalisation of the master plan, the lucknow development authority acted in arbitrary and mala fide manner and beyond the scope and power under section 11 of the act by affecting the changes in master plan, 2021 relating to the land in question as the ..... issued notification under sections 4 and 6 read with section 17 of the land acquisition act dispensing with the requirement of the objections under section 5a of the land acquisition act.4. the case of the lucknow development authority is that the writ petitions are not maintainable as the master plan, 2021 for the ..... to challenge the master plan, 2021 and the notification under land acquisition act in both the writ petitions and the defence taken by the state government and the lucknow development authority are near-about similar.3. the lucknow development authority (hereinafter referred to as 'authority') issued a public notice on 23.2.2005 inviting objections/suggestions to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2004 (HC)

Ram Kripal Patel Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2004)2UPLBEC1758

..... course of matter.'11. counsel for the respondents has relied upon case of dhannu lal v. vice chancellor, (1994) 1 uplbec 435 and m.d. up land development corporation and anr. v. amar singh and ors., and submitted that the facts of those case are similar to the facts of the present case. in that case ..... that this court cannot issue mandamus to issue appointment letter to the petitioner. it is also evident from record that the petitioner was never engaged by a competent authority of the university. engagement of petitioner as daily wager is doubtfull. the university has never paid wages to the petitioner. thus all facts are highly disputed which ..... a' has done work for 'b' even under an unenforceable, void of abortive contract, he can recover the value of his services. section 70 of the indian contract act also imposes an obligation on the university to pay to the petitioner for his services.it is further submitted that the petitioner should have been treated equally with other employees .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 1996 (HC)

Manik Chand Sethia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1997)143CTR(All)428; [1997]226ITR411(All); [1997]92TAXMAN524(All)

..... landlord (lessee), respondent no. 3.3. smt. krishna kalra, respondent no. 3, acquired the aforesaid plot, measuring 406.25 sq. mtrs., from the new okhla industrial development authority (hereinafter referred to as 'noida') on a lease of 99 years for a premium of rs. 73,937.50, by lease deed dated october 29, 1981. she ..... article 226 of the constitution of india, the petitioner challenges an order dated august 30, 1994, passed by the appropriate authority, lucknow, under section 269ud of the income-tax act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), ordering the purchase of plot no. b-70, sector 14, noida, for a consideration of rs. 14,57,149 ..... srivastava, learned standing counsel, contended that this aspect of the matter is not relevant to the issue because the term 'apparent consideration' has been defined in the act and such a liability cannot be included in the 'apparent consideration'. the contention is correct so far as the determination of 'apparent consideration' is concerned, but .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 2007 (HC)

Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidut Parishad Anusuchit Jati/Janjati Karmchari Ka ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1464

..... of an environment which will attract participation of private sector entrepreneurs in the electricity industry in the state and generally for taking measures conducive to the development and management of the electricity industry in the state in an efficient, economical and competitive manner and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.17. section ..... generating and distribution companies.3. sri p.k. srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of the plea, submitted that the state government is the authority to make appointments not only on the posts of managing director but also on the posts of director, which posts are civil posts under the state government, ..... posts in connection with the affairs of the state and includes services and posts in-(i) a local authority:(ii) a cooperative society as defined in clause (f) of section 2 of the uttar pradesh cooperative societies act, 1965, in which not less than fifty one percent of the share capital of the society is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2006 (HC)

Rajeev Kumar Jauhari Son of Surendra Kumar Jauhari, Vs. State of U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(1)ARBLR544(All); 2007(2)AWC1726

..... of bihar and ors. : (1969)iillj549sc , andhra pradesh state road transport corporation v. income tax officer : [1994]52itr524(sc) , western coalfields ltd. v. special area development authority : [1982]2scr1 . a constitution bench of the apex court in electronics corporation of india ltd. v. secretary, revenue department, government of a.p. : air1999sc1734 , in para ..... ' has been mentioned, the same may be referred to as the 'state' or 'commission' or 'company' or 'society' corporate or persons or authority as provided under the reforms act, 1999 or the rules and regulations framed thereunder, except wherever, it relates to general policy matter where it would be read as the 'state government'. ..... section 49 further provides that no order under sub-section (1) shall be made after expiration of a period of two years from the commencement of the act. the reforms act, 1999 was amended in 2003 and in sub-section (1) of section 49, the words '12 months' were substituted by '60 months' and under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 1996 (HC)

Waf Alalaulad and Another Vs. M/S. Sundardas Daulatram and Sons and Ot ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All355

..... sri suresh kumar yadav, who was manager and agent of the tenants. if sri yadav has, by handing over possession of the property to the owners, acted beyond the authority given to him by his employer, it is the matter between him and his employer and it cannot be said to tae a case of property grabbing ..... v. narayan khimalal totama : air1990sc630 the supreme court has held that a 'reasonable residence' for a man being a 'necessity for fulfilling constitutional goal in the matter of development of man', is included in 'life' in article 21 of the constitution. in unnikrishnan v. state of andhra pradesh : [1993]1scr594 the supreme court has reiterated that ..... , p. sahi : air1959sc951 . in the -words and phrases' permanent edition. vol. 33 at p. 99, it is stated that parens patriae is the inherent porfer and authority of a legislature to provide protection to the person and properly of persons non suijuris, such as minor, insan, and incompetent persons, but the words 'parens pairiae' meaning thereby .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 1997 (HC)

Raza Textiles Ltd. and ors. Vs. Appellate Authority for Industrial and ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1998]94CompCas468(All)

..... that the company should be wound up.7. petitioners nos. 2 and 3 then preferred an appeal under section 25 of the act to the appellate authority, which was dismissed, it is claimed that the appellate authority did not go into the question of viability of the reconstruction of the company and without going into the merits of the ..... rehabilitation scheme, dismissed the appeal on the ground that the promoters were not parties to the proceedings before the bifr. the appellate authority also held that no scheme was submitted before the bifr, and that the scheme dated november 14, 1992, a copy of which is annexure 'i' to the writ ..... 1 claimed to suffer losses and, therefore, it itself made a reference to the aforesaid board under section 15 of the act to be declared to be a sick company. the reference was accepted and the industrial development bank of india (hereinafter referred to as 'the idbi') was appointed as an operating agency to suggest a scheme for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2004 (HC)

K.A. Wadhwani Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(4)AWC3505

..... 210, vishal khand, gomti nagar, lucknow.we also direct opposite party nos. 3, 4 and 5, i.e., vice-chairman, lucknow development authority, officer on special duty, parks, lucknow development authority and assistant engineer, parks, lucknow development authority, lucknow, respectively to prevent misuse of the park in question in future.since we have directed opposite party no. 8, i.e., mr ..... about some encroachment in the park before house no. 3/210, vishal khand, gomti nagar, lucknow, only and the details of the encroachment, which the lucknow development authority always furnished, were not mentioned in the letter. in para 17 of the affidavit, it has been averred that the department had no knowledge that a marriage ceremony ..... compensation, it would be erroneous merely to go by the extent of damage to the park. we feel that the compensation should be such that it would act as a deterrent for others not to use the park in the manner or its like, as it has been used by opposite party no. 8, mr .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 2005 (HC)

U.P. Badminton Association Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2434

..... by the high court. the second area of controversy arose out of the order of the vice chairman, lucknow development authority, cancelling the earlier order dated january 31, 1985, granting permission under section 15 of the act in favour of the respondent lessees to develop the lease hold property by erecting thereon a multi-storeyed building called 'balrampur towers'.73. the controversy arose, as ..... the government brought to the notice of the then vice chairman, lucknow development authority what, according to the government, were serious illegalities in the sanction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2005 (HC)

Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Vs. A.P. Verma and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2005All175; (2005)2UPLBEC1813

..... lucknow (sunday), faizabad (monday) and varanasi (tuesday) at the given addresses.5. the applicant submits that no permission has been taken from the allahabad development authority to utilise the park, the people who assemble in the park ease and defecate around the park and the entire area becomes nauseative. sri ajay pratap ..... the lal mahendra sewa shakti samiti, kotwa kot, allahabad is a registered society, with registration no. 1405 under the provisions of the societies registration act. the aims and object of the society are purely religious and charitable, such as to establish intoxication free society to serve the helpless, to help ..... them from persons practicing and professing unauthorized medical practices.17. the indian medical council act 1956, the indian medicine central council act 1970, the u.p. indian medicine act 1939, the homoeopathic central council act 1993, the dentists act, 1948 provide for a statutory scheme of educational qualifications, standards of education, award .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //