Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Court: chennai Page 1 of about 573 results (0.165 seconds)

T.T.C. Cheran Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to Go ...

Court : Chennai

..... conflict between the role to be played by the grama sabha under the act and the role to be played by the block development officer in certifying the payments made out of account no.3. section 3(3) of the act does not contemplate the grama sabha to be an authority competent to conduct audit. section 3(3) merely contemplates the grama sabha as ..... .1997, was also given a statutory status with the government issuing a notification in g.o.ms.no.233, rural development (c-iii) department, dated 17.07.1997, issued in exercise of the powers conferred by section 188(2) of the act. (e) but, within a year of the issue of the aforesaid notification, creating three different fund accounts for all village .....

Ms. Lot Anwesha Engineering. Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax.

Court : Chennai

..... the power to tax sale of goods under entry 54 of the list ii of schedule vii of the constitution of india and is therefore, invalid.13. in lucknow development authority vs. m.k.gupta (1994 air 787), it had been held that it had been accepted, both by the supreme court of india, as well as by ..... petitioner. thereafter, the impugned notice, dated 20.1.2012, had been issued by the second respondent, as per the relevant provisions of the tamil nadu value added tax act, 2006.22. further, the petitioner had approached this court by invoking its extraordinary jurisdiction, under article 226 of the constitution of india, without availing the alternative remedy available ..... goods in question, originating from the state of gujarat, moved through stock transfer note, is not supported by the necessary registration, under the tamil nadu value added tax act, 2006, in the state of tamil nadu and that the buyer is an unregistered dealer.4. it has been further stated that the petitioner had appeared before the .....

G. Sivalingam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary to Govt. H ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2003)2MLJ701

..... and commercial neighbourhood scheme on both sides of the inner ring road to ensure and to regulate orderly development by madras metropolitan development authority under their project known as a1 land assembly and development project along inner ring road, over an extent of 5.81.0 hectares in manjambakkam village, saidapet ..... under their project known as a1 land assembly and development ..... development department dated 28.6.1995 issued under section 6 of the act, the petitioners' lands were acquired for a public purpose i.e., to wit for development of residential and commercial neighbourhood scheme on both sides of the inner ring road to ensure and to regulate orderly development by madras metropolitan development authority .....

L.Vinayagam and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1995)1MLJ509

..... . lakshmi devi : air1963sc1077 ). in other words, the fact that actual development is permissible in an area other than a development area with the approval or sanction of the local authority did not preclude the central government from acquiring the land for planned development under the act. section 12 is concerned only with the planned development. it has nothing to do with acquisition of property; acquisition generally ..... precedes development. for planned development in an area other than a development area, it is only necessary to obtain the sanction or .....

Lcs City Makers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

..... and consequently would not attract service tax. further, if the ultimate owner enters into a contract for construction of a residential complex with a promoter / builder / developer, who himself provides service of design, planning and construction; and after such construction the ultimate owner receives such property for his personal use, then such activity ..... of residential complex was brought under service tax w.e.f.01.06.2005, doubts have arisen regarding the applicability of service tax in a case where developer / builder/promoter enters into an agreement, with the ultimate owner for selling a dwelling unit in a residential complex at any stage of construction (or even ..... to be a residential complex within the definition under section 65 (91a) of finance act, 1994. 18.2. the counsel also submits that the entire matter regarding kamakotivilasam project was brought to the notice of the departmental authorities vide letter dt. 23.12.2005. in fact, this letter was in the context of .....

A. Mohamed Ali Vs. the Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Li ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2009Mad44

..... in matters of the financial corporations, the writ court has no say and the high court, in exercise of jurisdiction under article 226 cannot act as an appellate authority while reviewing quasi-judicial or administrative action.5. in support of his arguments, the learned senior counsel for the first respondent would rely on ..... 1 l.w.298,2. the andhra pradesh state financial corporation v. gar re-rolling mills and anr. 1994 2 l.w.363. karnataka state industrial investment and development corporation ltd. v. cavalet india ltd. and ors. : (2005)4scc456 ,4. tamil nadu industrial investment corporation ltd. v. millenium business solutions pvt. limited : ..... judgments of the orissa high court in sulochana nair v. managing director : air1992ori157 and punjab and haryana high court in jasbir kaur v. punjab state industrial development corporation ltd. , has held as follows:section 29 clearly states that the financial corporation shall have the right to take over the management of possession of .....

Gilles Pfeiffer Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1996Mad322

..... several years; he is desirous to work consistent with the objects of the act and wants to develop the spiritual side of his personality; the name of a member of the resident assembly can be removed or added in the register only under the act by the competent authority, and as such the impugned order ought not have been passed contrary to ..... the provisions of the act; is unacceptable for the simple reason that the act, 1946 is ..... no doubt whatsoever as regards the issue whether a foreigner should be allowed to stay in india or not is a matter to be dealt with under the act, 1946 by the competent authority i.e., the central government.49. in the result, for the reasons stated above, i find no merit in the writ petition. hence it is dismissed .....

The Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Its Secretary to Government, Ministry ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(4)CTC460; (2006)4MysLJ826

..... maintainability of such writ petition at the instance of the member-secretary, chennai metropolitan development authority.12. in this context, it is noticed that under section 9(b) of the tamil nadu town and country planning act, 1971, the metropolitan development authority, a body corporate, shall have perpetual succession and a common seal and subject to ..... relating to coastal regulatory zone. such amendment was challenged in w.p. no. 15518/2003, which was filed by the member-secretary, chennai metropolitan development authority. such writ petition was entertained by a learned single judge and an order of interim stay of such notification till 25.06.2003 was passed by ..... such restriction or qualification as may be imposed by or under this act or any other law, may sue or be sued in its .....

M/s. Tungabadra Minerals Private Limited Vs. The Chennai Port Trust Re ...

Court : Chennai

..... of plant' would indicate only the plaintiff and stated that this would constitute a supervening circumstance. in this connection, the learned counsel relied on delhi development authority vs. kenneth builders and developers ltd., and ors., reported in 2016 scc online sc 627 and stated that the defendants being a state owned a greater duty towards the plaintiff ..... upsets the very foundation upon which the parties rested their bargain, it can very well be said that the promissory finds it impossible to do the act which he promised to do. although various theories have been propounded by the judges and jurists in england regarding teh juridical basis of the doctrine of frustration ..... having been indulged in illegal activity cannot turn around and seek indulgence from this court. frustration of a contract is a direct result owing to their own act. they involved in illegal activity of mining iron ore with their eyes opened. they invited the ban. they cannot complain that the government orders has .....

Shanmugadurai Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary and Commi ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2001)2MLJ202

..... public purpose mentioned is as follows:'to wit for land assembly (?) and development project along inner ring road by madras metropolitan development authority.'from a cursory look at the notification of the acquisition act, it is abundantly clear that it is vague and the competent authority has not specifically stated the public purpose for which the lands are sought to be acquired. the usage of ..... the terms, 'lands are required for the purpose of land assembly and development project' are very general .....