Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Court: chennai Page 19 of about 573 results (0.236 seconds)

Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer, Coimbatore Housing Unit ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2009)2MLJ918

..... padma and ors. v. deputy secretary to the government of tamil nadu and ors. : (1997)2scc627 and in municipal corporation of greater bombay v. the industrial development investment co. ltd. : air1997sc482 , the supreme court has reiterated the same law and declared that after the award is passed and possession is taken, the challenge ..... event, after the award is passed, no writ petition can be filed challenging the acquisition notice or against any proceedings thereunder.in mohan singh v. international airports authority of india : (1997)9scc132 , the supreme court has held that once possession is taken, the land stands free from all encumbrances. the same view has ..... language. the said section contemplates only a publication of the gazette in the newspapers circulated in that locality. even though section 4(1) of the act refers to the publication of the notification in two daily newspapers circulated in that locality, while interpreting the said section, the courts have taken the view .....

Southern Agrifurane Industries Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2002]126STC550(Mad)

..... on july 28, 1993, the following parties were heard, they being :(a) southern agrifurane ltd. (petitioner)(b) bank of madura(c) syndicate bank(d) industrial development bank of india (idbi)(e) industrial finance corporation of india (ifci)(f) tamil nadu industrial investment corporation limited (tiic)(g) southern petrochemical industries corporation limited (spic)(h ..... 4. before we advert to the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner, few facts because of which the matters came before the sales tax authorities are also necessary.5. it seems that after sending the aforementioned letter dated august 4, 1994, the petitioner-company thought that the g.o. ms. ..... of the supreme court reported in : (1953)illj186sc (strawboard . v. gutta mill workers' union) where section. 14 of the u.p. general clauses act, 1904 fell for consideration. the learned counsel pointed out that the said decision was consistently followed. the supreme court held that in the absence of any distinct .....

The Chairman, Tamilnadu Housing Board and the Executive Engineer and A ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)6MLJ419

..... . in such a case, it could not be said by claimants that they did not know of proposed scheme when it was duly published in newspapers by authorities as provided by bombay act.17. in the executive engineer and administrative officer, tnhb v. s. govindaraj and ors. : (2004)1mlj381 (cited supra), the division bench of this ..... after the award was passed and the possession was also handed over to the requisitioning body, who have spent a sum of rs. 10 lakhs towards the development of the lands acquired, the right, title and interest of the erstwhile owners got extinguished since the government and thereupon the requisitioning body has became the absolute ..... this contention in writ petitions filed at a stage when the awards were about to be passed.16. further, in municipal corporation of greater bombay v. the industrial development investment co. pvt. ltd. and ors. : air1997sc482 , their lordships of the honourable apex court have held:where no objection was raised by the claimants against the .....

Consim Info Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Google India Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

..... the law of trademarks, industrial designs and geographical indications (sct) of the wipo requested the secretariat to prepare a background document summarising the past and current developments in the area of trade marks and the internet. in accordance with the request by the sct, the secretariat prepared a document and presented the same on ..... process over 200 million searches per day (statistics as of 2007). due to the enormity of the number of visitors to their site, what was originally developed as a huge store house of information, slowly turned into a huge warehouse/supermarket of products and services that could be bought and sold or hired. the ..... to the information.2. paragraph 1 shall not apply when the recipient of the service is acting under the authority or the control of the provider.3. this article shall not affect the possibility for a court or administrative authority, in accordance with member states' legal systems, of requiring the service provider to terminate or prevent .....

Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... expert committee dated 17.2.2011. they do contain reasons for the conclusions reached. exercising jurisdiction under article 226, i am not expected to act as an appellate authority over a committee of doctors of super specialities and evaluate the reasons given by them. therefore, the decision of the bombay high court cannot ..... caption "microbial threat".(iii) the scientific community acknowledged the existence of a link between the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in animals and the development of resistance to these products in humans, on the ground that the antibiotic resistance is transferable from animals to humans.(iv) the possibility and probability ..... matter of imminent necessity. recent studies show that the most famous antibiotic of the previous century namely penicillin itself is losing its potency. the periodical development of new generation drugs by pharmaceutical companies, is not merely driven by a greed to improve their market share, but also driven by the necessity .....

P.Balakrishnan Vs. the Commissioner and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... to whether the terms and conditions imposed by the state in the matter of absorption of respondents 2 to 4 in the permanent service of the ghaziabad development authority is ultra vires article 14 of the constitution of india.25. the state was making an offer to the respondents not in terms of any specific power ..... the petitioners case cannot be equated with that of the said mahalingam. in that case, the government by invoking its power under section 115 of the puducherry municipalities act,1973, has conferred all the benefits in respect of previous service, including the seniority. that apart, as stated in the counter affidavit, by virtue of such conferment ..... relevant portion of the transfer order is as follows: in exercise of powers conferred upon by sub-rule (2) of rule 115 of the pondicherry municipalities act,1973, government direct that the transfer of thiru s.mahalingam, electrician gr.ii of mahe municipality to pondicherry municipality to officiate in the same capacity ordered vide .....

indo Swiss Synthetic Gem Manufacturing Co. Ltd., and Etc. Vs. Governme ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1997Mad41

..... the sale profit, but for the purpose of better discharge of its obligations by the board, it cannot be said that the public enterprise has acted beyond its authority. the board in the present case shows that the surplus resulting from upward revision of tariffs applicable to the h.t. consumers made in the present ..... considering the validity of rule 39 of the tamil nadu minor mineral concessions rules. the said rule stated that the state government in the interest of mineral development and in the public interest grant or renew quarry licence etc. the argument was that the rule did not contain the necessary guidelines. observed the supreme ..... court (para 46):'it cannot also be disputed that mineral development is not a vague expression and the mmrd act and the rules framed under it, clearly furnish the scope and purport of the word 'mineral development'. it has been very reasonably contended that scientific exploitation of minerals without waste is undoubtedly .....

Dr. Vs. Shanmughavel V. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2002]121TAXMAN274(Mad)

..... urban lands; or(b) quantity surveying in building construction; or(c) architectural or structural designing of buildings or town planning; or(d) construction of buildings or development of lands;and his gross receipts from such practice should not be less than fifty thousand rupees in any three of the five preceding years.'rule 8a(8), ..... rendered service for not less than ten years as a valuer, architect or town planner, or in the field of construction of buildings, designing of structures, or development of land; or(c) as a professor, reader or lecturer in a university, college or any other institution preparing students for a degree in civil engineering, ..... evaluate the property for the purposes of wealth-tax. the learned counsel submits that by serving the notice in this case, the concerned authority, the respondent, has obviously chosen to do an act which is beyond his jurisdiction. a consulting engineer, who does the job of valuation on the basis of his registration as valuer of .....

Kothari and Sons and ors. Vs. N. Subramanian

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2001]252ITR153(Mad)

..... pointed out by learned counsel for the respondent, there may be assessment order or reassessment order on the basis of the subsequent development or on the basis of the request made by the petitioners by the authorities concerned. but, that would not absolve the accused persons from the offences which had already been committed. as indicated above, there ..... fact which has got a bearing on the allegations contained in the complaint has been decided by the settlement commission or by the tribunal or other authority under the income tax act, the criminal court has to give due regard to the finding given by them. but, the question that may arise for consideration is whether any ..... committed the offences under sections 120b, 193, 196, 420, 511 and 34 of the indian penal code, 1860 and sections 276c, 277 and 278 of the income tax act, 196l.'the petitions for quashing have been filed raising the grounds as given below :one of the petitioners, viz., mrs. indira d. kothari, filed an application before .....

K. Kumar Naicher Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1998)2MLJ533

..... board's letter no. i.a. i(3)/11326/86 dated 12.3.1986. the draft declaration under section 6 of the land acquisition act was approved in g.o.ms.no. 1525 housing and urban development department dated 28.9.1986 and published in the tamil nadu government gazette dated 29.9.1986. out of an extent of 1 acre in ..... . the board has not been vested with the unrestricted power to frame any scheme, as suggested by its planners. it has to take into account the representation by the local authority as mentioned under section 50 and the objection of any other person under section 53 and decide the same on merits before according sanction. the matter is not concluded even ..... under the rules framed. j. kanakaraj, j. in kanaammal (deceased) v. n. devaraj v. state of tamil naduand ors. (1990), w l.r. 439 held that 'remarks of the requisitioning authority should be available to the owner so called claimant whose land is acquired at the time of enquiry under section 5-a. as the remarks of the tamil nadu housing .....