Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Court: chennai Page 58 of about 573 results (0.199 seconds)

Kalai Selvi Vs. the State

Court : Chennai

..... on 11th december, 1992. the said convention sowed the seeds of the enactment of the juvenile justice (care and protection of children) act, 2000, by the indian parliament.43. india developed its own jurisprudence relating to children and the recognition of their rights. with the adoption of the constitution on 26th november 1949, constitutional ..... treaties. the united nations adopted a convention on the rights of child and prescribed a set of standards to be adhered to by all the state authorities in securing the interest of the child. further, it emphasized the social re-integration of child victims to the extent possible without resorting to judicial ..... children) rule 2007 is scrupulously followed. on the side of accused neither birth certificate issued by the chennai corporation nor birth certificate issued by the school authorities filed. hence the accused munusamy was directed to appear before the medical board. p.w.15 dr.vedanayagam after due medical examination produced exs.p32 and .....

Ex No 1383073x Sep Motte Chandra Reddy Vs. Union of India, Through Gov ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

..... is struck down, the court must be satisfied that a case has been made out for exercise of power of judicial review. we are not unmindful of the development of the law that from the doctrine of wednesbury unreasonableness, the court is leaning towards the doctrine of proportionality .. 24. in ranjit thakur v. union of india ..... formula. the following passage is in this regard apposite: 34. the constitutional requirement for judging the question of reasonableness and fairness on the part of the statutory authority must be considered having regard to the factual matrix obtaining in each case. it cannot be put in a straitjacket formula. it must be considered keeping in ..... found that the evidence produced in summary of evidence show a prima facie case against the applicant and charge was framed under section-69 of the army act. headquarters 475 engineer brigade ordered holding a trial by summary court martial against the applicant and the summary court martial found the applicant to be guilty for .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sundaram Spinning Mills and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1997)141CTR(Mad)109

..... ,557 for the asst. yr. 1973-74, in respect of which, the previous year ended on 31st march, 1972. as there was an audit objection that excess development rebate and extra-shift allowance were allowed and omission to disallow difference in foreign exchange on capital account, notice under s. 148 was issued and the assessee filed a ..... assessment can be made, for the first time also, in cases where no return was filed and no assessment had been made earlier and information had reached the assessing authority that income assessable to tax had escaped assessment. without reference to s. 143(3), reassessment cannot be made under s. 147 and, by virtue of the specific language ..... high court had held that there is a clear distinction between an assessment under s. 143 of the it act, 1961, and an assessment under s. 147 r/w s. 148 of the act. the assessment under s. 147 does not depend upon the authority of s. 143 for its completion. sec. 147 itself authorises the ito to assess/reassess or recompute .....