Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 section 3 constitution of the authority Court: chennai Page 14 of about 573 results (0.098 seconds)

D.Vijayakumari Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

..... release from detention should not be ordered against all or any of the respondents. (a) it is settled law that the satisfaction of the detaining authority under section 3 (1) of the act is subjective and not justiciable. reasonableness of the satisfaction cannot be questioned. state of bombay v. atma ram sridhar vaidya, (951) scr 167, ..... in the special leave petition which had been filed earlier seeking quashing of the detention order and the release of the petitioner. it is neither a subsequent development nor a new plea which may not have been available at the earlier stage. if the plea raised has not been considered in the judgment rendered ..... to show that the detention order has been passed on the entirety of materials taken into consideration. there are sufficient materials available to show that the detaining authority has come to a subjective satisfaction while passing the detention order. the materials provided in the grounds of detention, in unambiguous terms, make out a criminal .....

S.Sivasubramaniam Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority

Court : Chennai

..... like; (iv) amenities available in the place like public offices, hospitals and educational institutions; (v) development activities, industrial improvements in the vicinity; (vi) land tax valuation of sites with reference to taxation records of the local authorities concerned; (vii) any other features having a special bearing on the valuation of the site; and ..... district. .. respondents/respondents prayer: civil miscellaneous appeal filed under sub section (10) of section 47-a of the indian stamp act, 1899 against the proceedings of the chief controlling revenue authority cum inspector general of registration, santhome high road, chennai 600 028 and made in no.15666/n2/2005, dated 13.2.2006 ..... issued is clearly barred by limitation.4. the learned special government pleader submitted that no specific period has been prescribed under the provisions of the stamp act, 1899 and therefore, the reference is not invalid and it is not barred by limitation. 4.1. it is the specific contention of the .....

M/s. W.S. Industries (India) Ltd Vs. The District Revenue Officer Offi ...

Court : Chennai

..... thiruvannamalai and others] ; [2] 2009 [8] scc 310 [state of uttar pradesh and another v. man mohan nath sinha and another]; [3] 2012 [11] scc 731 [bhubaneswar development authority and another v. adikanda biswal and others] ; [4] 2012 [7] mlj 168 [r.pandian v. the district revenue officer, tiruchirappalli, and others] ; and [5] 2013 ..... did not make any attempt to summon a copy of the same either from the administrative department or from the district revenue officer, chengalpattu. but, acted on surmises and conjectures and as a consequence, reached the erroneous conclusion. the procedure adopted by the 1st respondent is wholly unsustainable in law and ..... of india limited and subsequently, changed its name as w.s. industries [india] limited . it is a public limited company incorporated under the indian companies act, 1956, in the year 1961 and was involved in manufacture of porcelain insulators for application in electrical high voltage transmission and distribution. the government of tamil .....

Minor K. Aravinthan Vs. The Principal, Sainik School, Tiruppur Distric ...

Court : Chennai

..... may have love and care in their home environment which may be good for their future and also opined that continuation in residential school is not conducive for their future development and therefore, made a recommendation for withdrawal of both of them from the school. 9. in unni raja v. principal, medical college, trivandrum [air 1983 ker ..... to maintain discipline in the institution and this right is incapable of an exhaustive identification. to limit it within defined confines would be to erode into his authority and fetter his discretion and to deny his right to the head of the institution would be sound the death-knell of discipline in the institution which is ..... he landed on one of his hands and it broke. the disciplinary committee has also recorded the fact that the petitioner did not express any remorse for his act. the disciplinary committee made a recommendation that both sri bhavan prakath as well as the petitioner have to be withdrawn from the school and the said recommendation .....

The Official Assignee of Madras Vs. S.R.M.M.R.M. Velliappa Chetty and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1922)42MLJ155

..... j. in colonial bank v. whinney (1885) 30 ch. d. 261 at page 285 contains a valuable resume of the development of the law as to 'things in action. the question there was whether shares in a company were choses in possession or ..... is called) vested in the pledgee. this is an undisputed proposition and does not carry the case further than to furnish legal authority for the insolvents to create a second charge on the pledged bales. the second case was exparte roy in re. sillence (1877 ..... (inter alia) provides that any transfer by the insolvent for valuable consideration is valid (subject to the provisions of the act as to the avoidance of certain transfers, preferences as to which there is now no question in this case) provided that ..... authorized to deal with the land or goods as the case may be. it is said the same applies here. it must be 'goods' actual, tangible concrete things-not intangibles such as an equity of redemption. it is clear that in the chapter (ix) on bailments in the contract act .....

Hindustan Wires Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1992(40)ECC49

..... the question that was considered in that case was, whether ms rods, bars and rounds would fall under item 1 of the schedule to the income-tax act, 1961, to earn extra development rebate. item 1 of the schedule reads as under : 'iron and steel (metal), ferro alloys and special steels.' the supreme court, after referring to ..... except the opinion of the indian standards institute in its specifications, in our opinion, the tribunal was not right in the view it took. * * * there was authority of the indian standards institute's publication 'glossary of terms used in paper trade and industry-is : 4661. in view of the facts as appeared in paragraph 14 ..... -tax v. krishna copper and steel rolling mills reported in : [1992]193itr281(sc) . 9. mr. c. natarajan, in support of his various contentions, cited number of authorities which we will refer to and discuss at the appropriate place. 10. mr. a. k. gopinath, learned government advocate (taxes), submitted that though the decision rendered in [1983 .....

The Official Assignee of Madras Vs. S.R.M.M.R.M. Valliappa Chetti and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1922Mad144; (1922)ILR65Mad238

..... judgment of fry, l.j., in colonial bank v. whinney (1885) 30 ch. d. 261contains a valuable, resume of the development of the law as to 'things in action.' the question there was whether shares in a company were choses in possession or in ..... is called) vested in the pledgee. this is an undisputed proposition and does not carry the case further than to furnish legal authority for the insolvents to create a second charge on the pledged bales. the second case was ex-parte roy re sillence (1877 ..... which inter alia provides that any transfer by the insolvent for valuable consideration is valid (subject to the provisions of the act as to the evidence of certain transfers, and preferences, as to which there is now no question in this case) ..... authorized to deal with the land or goods, as the case may be. it is said the same applies here. it must be 'goods,' actual, tangible, concrete, things, not intangibles, such as an equity of redemption. it is clear that in chapter ix on bailment in the contract act .....

Sri Rama Vilas Service (Private) Ltd., Kumbakonam by Its Director, K.A ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1959Mad492

..... qualified who may be granted the permit. we need not embark on a discussion of the merits and defects of monopoly from the point of view of economic development.in certain circumstances monopoly in a particular kind of trade or business may be in the interest of the public but in other circumstances, it may have ..... not in the public interests.2. the governor of madras therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by section 43-a of the motor vehicles act, 1939 hereby directs all transport authorities to ensure when considering applicants for stage carriage permits that no permits are granted to applicants who though purporting to be new entrants in the ..... of the very able arguments of several learned counsel who appeared before us for the several parties.4. section 47(1) of that motor vehicles act says that the regional transport authority in deciding whether to grant or refuse a stage carriage permit shall have regard to the following matters:(a) the interest of the public generally;(b .....

Sri Rama Vilas Service, Limited Vs. the Road Traffic Board by Its Secr ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1948Mad400; (1948)1MLJ85

..... runs between two points within the city. a permit is required for each bus running upon a route, which is granted by the regional transport authority (so designated in the act), and is the respondent, called 'the road traffic board, madras.' prior to february, 1947, the appellant held 24 permits for buses to ..... with any commercial enterprise.section 43. (1) a provincial government, having regard to--(a) the advantages offered to the public, trade and industry by the development of motor transport, and(b) the desirability of co-ordinating road and rail transport, and(c) the desirability of preventing the deterioration of the road system, ..... the desirability of preventing uneconomic competition among motor vehicles and after having heard the representatives of the interests affected and having consulted the provincial and regional transport authorities concerned, may, by notification in the official gazette,(i) prohibit or restrict throughout the province or in any area or on any route... the .....

K. Bhashyam Iyengar and anr. Vs. the Superintendent of Police, Special ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1951Mad855; (1951)1MLJ450

..... under item 1, namely, all deeds & instruments relating to any matters other than those hereinafter specified. in respect of these the prescribed authorities are, secretaries to govt. & the addl. secretary to govt. development dept. appendix 7 to the madras financial code which contains special rules & restrictions regarding particular items of contingent expenditure inter alia contains ..... could arise are nob fulfilled. this is such a case. it has been held in this ct. that if the provisions of section 175(3), govt. of india act, are not satisfied, there is no contract which can bind the govt. as such, vide sarikara mining syndicate v. secretary of state : air1938mad749 and perumal v. madras ..... . for evictions the resps. would not, therefore, be entitled to rely on an exemption from the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 7 of the act. the petnrs. will be entitled to an order of eviction. 5. it was contended by the advocate general that the parties including petnr. 2 were under the .....