Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 chapter 1 Court: allahabad Page 93 of about 8,332 results (0.111 seconds)

Munni Devi and ors. Vs. Babu Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... . winfield on tort has brought out even a chapter on the 'rule in rylands v. fletcher'. at page 543 of the 15th edn. of the celebrated work the learned author has pointed out that over the years rylands v. fletcher has been applied to a remarkable variety of things; fire, gas, explosions, electricity, oil, noxious fumes, colliery spoil ..... the defendant, the defendant is not liable for its escape. (3) act of stranger i.e. if the escape was caused by the unforeseeable act of a stranger, the rule does not apply. (4) exercise of statutory authority i.e the rule will stand excluded either when the act was done under a statutory duty or when a statute provides otherwise. ..... (5) act of god or vis major i.e. circumstances which no human .....

Babu Ram Vs. D.J. Varanasi and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... and others reported in 2002 (2) awc 1137, along with chhabi lal and others vs. rajveer singh and others reported in 2009(6) adj 67, amir alam khan vs. lucknow development authority reported in 2011 (112) r.d. 125, kulwant kaur sidhu vs. smt. rahiman bai guddi @ r.b. guddi chaudhary reported in 2006 (100) r.d. 626. learned ..... the jurisdiction of the court to entertain particular action notwithstanding the language used in the plaint or relief claimed. the expression "any relief" used in section 331 of act is of too wide import and would not only mean the relief claimed but would also include any relief arising out of the "cause of action" which led the ..... order dated 17.7.2000 passed by the additional commissioner (administration) varanasi division, varanasi in revision no. 89 of 2000 filed under section 219 of the land revenue act by the plaintiff/respondent no.3 and others vs. babu ram and others. he submitted that by order dated 17.7.2000 restoration application filed by the plaintiff- .....

Menka Picture Palace and anr. Vs. D.M. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1316; 2005(2)ESC949

..... seats in various classes mentioned in the licence thereof and shall include any increase in the maximum number of seats by an amendment allowed by the licensing authority.'10. from a bare perusal of the above rule the following things are clear. the proprietor of a cinema opting to make compounded payment of entertainment ..... the respective submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. the controversy centres around about the interpretation of rule 24a of rules, 1981. section 3 of the act, 1979, is charging section. it provides the levy of entertainment tax for admission to any entertainment. proviso to section 3 is substantive provision and it lays ..... 2 is the proprietor and licensee to exhibit cinema films. it has been granted licence to exhibit cinema under the u. p. entertainment and betting tax act, 1979 and cinematograph act, 1952 at salempur, district deoria. the petitioners are liable to pay entertainment tax for the admission to the entertainment provided to the public in the .....

Rani Amrit Kunwar Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central and United P ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1946All306

..... that case that the maharaja of baroda was a sovereign prince and could not be sued in a british court. the matter arose before the house of lords in duff development co. ltd. v. government of kalantan (1924) 1924 a.c. 797. the position of the state of kelantan was analogous to the position of the indian states, yet their ..... the outstanding attributes of sovereignty is the ruler's immunity from being sued in a foreign court see oppenheim's international law, edn. 5, vol. i, page 590. in duff development co. ltd. v. government of kalantan (1924) 1924 a.c. 797, viscount pinlay said that, though it was obvioua that in order to have sovereignty there must be a ..... was an independent sovereign and exempt from payment of income-tax in british india, his wife was not so exempt. the central government has been given authority by section 60 of the indian income-tax act to make an exemption, reduction in rate or other modification, in respect of income-tax in favour of any class of income, or in regard .....

Sahu Makhan Lal Vs. Mufti Mohammad Tawassul Husain

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1936All628

..... the lease. as regards the deductions made in 1338-f, the matter is not so simple. according to section 73(1), agra tenancy act (act 3 of 1926):when for any cause the local government, or any authority empowered by it in this behalf, remits or suspends for any period the payment of the whole or any part of the revenue payable ..... (3) of this section it is provided that the word 'tenant' includes a 'thekadar.' it is to be observed however that in cases where the local government or any authority remits or suspends for any period the payment of the whole or any part of the revenue, a collector, or an assistant collector of the first class, if so empowered ..... regard to thekadars. the ruling set out that the contract between the zamindar and the thekadar was overridden by the express provision of law contained in section 51, tenancy act, and that the stipulation in the lease, that rent would be payable irrespective of whether there was any drought or flood or any calamity causing loss of produce in .....

Kanhaiya Lal and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Another

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1518; (2001)3UPLBEC2080

..... 15 itself) also submitted his report favourably. despite favourable reports and recommendations, the desired certificate has not been issued till date, respondent no. 1 has no authority to withhold issuance of the desired certificate. petitioner no. 2 personally visited the office of respondent no. 1 on 22.5.1995 and requested him for issuance ..... on their freedom fighter grandfather. the mere relation of petitioner no. 2 as grandson to petitioner no. 1 who is admittedly a freedom fighter under the act, was sufficient for issuance of the desired certificate. thus, the reasons given in the impugned order and the counter affidavit are wholly misconceived, irrelevant and the ..... treated as dependent. son and daughter referred to in clause (i) aforementioned has to be necessarily given preference. even under section 8 of the hindu succession act. 1956, the property of a male hindu dying intestate shall devolve firstly on the son and not on the grandson, the government has taken a correct stand .....

Praveen Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Through the Secretary, Nagar Vikas, Go ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC3209; (2004)1UPLBEC721

..... the quintessence of direction was that pending regularisation, the daily wage employees are entitled to get minimum of the wages and also referred to various other cases including ghaziabad development authority v. vikram chaudhary, 1995 (3) awc 1596 (sc) : 1995 (9) scc 210, in fortifying his stand that the petitioners are not entitled to minimum ..... resources. keeping both in view that reposing our trust in the relevant instrumentalities of the state that may be connected with the implementation of the scheme to act with a sense of fairness, anxiety too meet the demands of the human requirements and also anxious to fulfil the constitutional obligations of the state, the ..... mince words to state that the nagar palika parishad, modi nagar has already put in papers to the state government for creation of posts and it would act upon regularisation process as soon as the requisite posts are sanctioned by the state government. the learned counsel, however, vehemently demurred to the contention of .....

Central Bank of India Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Government Indust ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(3)AWC2263; [2008(118)FLR39]; (2008)IIILLJ635All

..... 5464 (sc).5. mahboob deepak v. nagar panchayat, gajraula and anr. 2008 air scw 223.6. ghaziabad development authority and anr. v. ashok kumar and anr. 2008 air scw 1474.6. paragraphs 6 to 13 of the authority of mahboob deepak (supra) are quoted below:6. such termination of service, having regard to the fact that ..... regularisation.4. secretary, haryana state electricity board v. suresh and ors. etc. etc. : (1999)illj1086sc .it is the case regarding contract labour and prohibition act.10. accordingly, first writ petition is allowed and impugned judgment of reinstatement with back wages is set aside and substituted by order of payment of consolidated damages as ..... he had completed more than 240 days, hence his retrenchment without payment of notice pay and retrenchment compensation was bad under section 25f of industrial disputes act, 1947. the tribunal merely on the basis that concerned workman had worked 325 days held that his termination was bad for non-payment of retrenchment compensation .....

Shine Travels and Cargo Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(99)ECC605; 2005(179)ELT516(All)

..... proper case arise.).'14. the aforesaid decision has been followed subsequently in the case of yadu nandan garg v. state of rajasthan and ors., (1996) 1 scc 334; secretary, jaipur development authority, jaipur v. daulat mal jain and ors., (1997) 1 scc 35; state of haryana and ors. v. ram kumar mann, (1997) 3 scc 321; style (dress land ..... corrected it is difficult to see how it can be made a basis for its repetition. by refusing to direct the respondent-authority to repeat the illegality, the court is not condoning the earlier illegal act/order nor can such illegal order constitute the basis for a legitimate complaint of discrimination. giving effect to such pleas would be ..... referred to in regulation 9. under sub-regulation (3) of regulation 10, the commissioner is empowered to reject an application for grant of a regular licence to act as a customs house agent, if the holder of a temporary licence fails to qualify in the examination in terms of regulation 9 or his performance is not suitable. .....

Amir Hasan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC3863

..... matter the limitation contained therein, applicable to the proceedings under section 30 for the same reasons as are applicable to the proceedings under section 18 of the act.13. in gorakhpur development authority, gorakhpur v. district judge, gorakhpur and ors. : air1991all241 , & division bench of this court has, however, held that order i, rule 10, ..... c.p.c. has no application to reference proceeding under section 18 of the land acquisition act, its applicability is excluded by the context of the act, i.e., by ..... reference court gets jurisdiction only if the matter is referred to it under section 18 or 30 of the act by land acquisition officer and that civil court has got jurisdiction and authority only to decide the objections referred to it. the reference court cannot enlarge the scope of jurisdiction or decides .....