Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 chapter 1 Court: allahabad Page 89 of about 8,332 results (0.168 seconds)

Apr 22 2010 (HC)

Kulwant Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. Thru. P.S. Home Dept. and ors ...

Court : Allahabad

..... writ petitions challenging notifications under sub-section (1) of section-4 proposing to acquire the land before the notification under section 6 is published.7. in kanpur development authority v. mahabir sahkari avas samiti ltd. (2005) 10 scc 320 and daulat singh surana and ors. v. first land acquisition collector and ors. (2007) ..... . (2005) 10 scc 320, the apex court held as under:it is well-settled that notification issued under section 4 (1) of the act normally cannot be quashed unless there are exceptional circumstances, like the ..... to section 4 (1) of the act and raising objections against acquisition at that stage and not to have been interfered and a preliminary notification ought to have been quashed overruling well-founded objections as to the maintainability of the petition raised by the state.11. in kanpur development authority v. mahabir sahkari avas samiti ltd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2010 (HC)

Davendra Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. Thru. P.S. Home Dept. and or ...

Court : Allahabad

..... writ petitions challenging notifications under sub-section (1) of section-4 proposing to acquire the land before the notification under section 6 is published.7. in kanpur development authority v. mahabir sahkari avas samiti ltd. (2005) 10 scc 320 and daulat singh surana and ors. v. first land acquisition collector and ors. (2007) ..... . (2005) 10 scc 320, the apex court held as under:it is well-settled that notification issued under section 4 (1) of the act normally cannot be quashed unless there are exceptional circumstances, like the ..... to section 4 (1) of the act and raising objections against acquisition at that stage and not to have been interfered and a preliminary notification ought to have been quashed overruling well-founded objections as to the maintainability of the petition raised by the state.11. in kanpur development authority v. mahabir sahkari avas samiti ltd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2011 (HC)

M/S Cantt Dry Cleaners,119 Sadar Bazar,lko.(Morning Session) Vs. Union ...

Court : Allahabad

..... work. for the purpose, he relied on the ratio laid down in the following case-laws:-1. tata cellular v. union of india and others (1994) 6 scc 6512. delhi development authority and others v. uee electricals engg. (p) ltd. & others, 2004 (11) scc 2133. director of education & others v. educomp datamatics ltd. & others, 2004 (4) scc 19 and 4. ..... the same to the computer section of the railways who maintains the record of the contractor supplying the bedrolls and linen. for that purpose, a software will have to be developed at the earliest.(7) that in the feed back card, it is expected that there must be columns pertaining to the name, address and contact number of the passengers ..... party no.3 had not submitted the tender, details of work which they have done.7. learned counsel further submits that the opposite-parties no.1 and 2 have acted illegally and in an arbitrary manner by denying the contract to the petitioner by violating the tender procedure laid down in clauses 3,5,6 and 8 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 1930 (PC)

Sri Ram Chandra Naik Kalya Vs. Satya NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1930All353; 124Ind.Cas.471

..... a court to assess revenue if there is revenue payable on the land in question. the learned counsel for the appellant referred to the provisions of section 58, land revenue act, to the effect that revenue might be assessed on this land, but the question before us is not whether revenue might be assessed at some future date on this land ..... lower courts have also dismissed the suit of the plaintiff. it was claimed by the learned counsel on behalf of the appellant-plaintiff, that his case came under section 156, act 2 of 1901. section 150 lays down that the proprietor of a mahal or part of a mahal may sue to resume possession of on have rent assessed on any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 1957 (HC)

R.L. Aurora Ram Ditta Mal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1958All126

..... again considered by the calcutta high court on the question of the validity of section 8 and explanation attached to section 8a of the west bengal planning and development act which is reported in west bengal settlement kanungo cooperative credit society v, mrs. bella banerjee : air1952cal554 . it was held in that case that:'the provisions ..... .'13. explanation to this article provides that a law in force in this article shall include a law passed or made by a legislature or other competent authority in the territory of india before the commencement of this constitution and not previously repealed. this explanation, to my mind, clearly provides that the competence of ..... as it stood before the fourth constitutional amendment was passed by the parliament is as follows :'1. no person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law. 2. no property movable or immovable- including any interest in or in any company owing any commercial or industrial undertaking, shall be taken possession .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 1956 (HC)

Raja Ram Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1958All141

..... district officers in u. p. containing the general instructions issued with the approval of the government for the training of lekhpals in survey, land record planning and development.6. paragraph 10 of the general instructions a copy of which was appended to the circular as appendix 'a' provided that after the training was over the ..... village level workers so that the personnel so recruited may be able to render help to the planning department in its multifarious activities. the training in the development work would be for a fortnight and the planning department would be requested to draw up a programme of the training.paragraph 7 of the order then ..... to the provisions of the legislative enactment. the government order which gave power to the various authorities to appoint lekhpals stood modified by the u. p. amending act no. xviii of 1956, whereby section 23 of the land revenue act was amended and the following section was substituted:--'the state government shall appoint a lekhpal for each .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 1942 (PC)

Dr. Brij Behari Lal Vs. Emperor Through Municipal Board

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1943All123

..... would lie. reliance was placed on behalf of the respondent on the definition of the word 'board' as given in section 2(1) of the said act and it is argued on its authority that in every place where the words 'executive officer' occur, the word 'board' could be substituted. the point has been discussed by bennet j. ..... is a result of erroneous consideration or of no consideration at all as known to law. on the interpretation of sections 318 and 321, municipalities act, there is undoubtedly conflict of judicial authority and this conflict centres round the question whether by these sections the jurisdiction of civil courts is excluded or of criminal courts also and whether ..... then it is competent to issue a notice under section 186. in the present case, therefore, it appears to me that the board was clearly acting within the scope of its authority in issuing the notice because it clearly considered the erection of the building to be an offence under section 185.24. further on the learned judge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2003 (HC)

Dinesh Kumar Shukla Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(2)AWC1298

..... proposes to reject the findings of the enquiry officer. in yoginath bagde v. state of maharashtra, 1999 scc 739, the supreme court held that if the disciplinary authority does not agree with the findings of the enquiry officer then before forming its final opinion, it has to convey to the charged employee its tentative reasons for disagreeing ..... with the findings. 12. in the present case, we are of the opinion that the respondents have acted wholly arbitrarily. despite the judgment of this court dated 7.11.2001, they have not finalised the enquiry against the petitioner. it is well-settled by the decision ..... action does not appear to be male fide. the enquiry officer observed in his report that had there been deliberate violation of section 3 (6) of the act, the posts under the reserved category would not have been carried forward. in the committee the members were not only the petitioner but also members belonging to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1985 (HC)

Smt. Gayatri Devi Vs. Om Prakash Gautam and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1985All356

..... and from executing lease in respect of plot no. 169 in her favour. the respondent has put in contest. the agra development authority, which replaced the nagar mahapalika under the uttar pradesh urban planning and development act, 1973, executed lease for ninety-nine years under a registered instrument in favour of the respondent on 15th dec. 1978, for ..... his favour formally and to refund the amount. sri saraswat learned counsel for the petitioner urged that he had applied on 27th nov. 1978, to the agra development authority, wherein the recital was that he got possession over the plot subsequent to the deposit of the amount dt. 30-7(9?)-1972. from this it is ..... feb. 1981, passed by the iv additional district judge, agra, is set aside except to the extent it allows the impleadment of the agra development authority and the insertion of para 10-a in the plaint bringing in the agra development authority which has since replaced the nagar mahapalika, agra. the parties shall bear their own costs.

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2009 (HC)

Managing Committee and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3863

..... held that once the tenure of the election of the office bearer was over by passage of time, the court should decide the controversy keeping in view the latter development.in : 1991(2) scc 412 k. murugan v. sencing association of india, jabalpur and another, when the tenure of the office bearer of indian olympic association ..... and it has been passed with due opportunity of hearing to the parties. it has been submitted that only election dispute may be referred to the prescribed authority and not a controversy with regard to amendment in the bye-laws of the society by which the total members of the general body have been increased ..... the assistant registrar while passing the impugned order has exceeded its jurisdiction and the matter could have been referred to the prescribed authority under sub section (1) of section 25 of the societies registration act. he submits that the order has been passed without providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the affected parties.4 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //