Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: kannada development authority act 1994 chapter 1 Court: allahabad Page 100 of about 8,332 results (0.266 seconds)

Jul 28 2009 (HC)

D. Freezo India Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. U.P. State Industrial Developme ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3576

..... area of 1415 square meters and they at that time were also suffering from financial difficulty. the judgment relied by counsel for the petitioners in delhi development authority's case (supra) laid down the proposition that terms and conditions of the contract cannot be unilaterally changed and a party to the contract cannot ..... substance is the heart beat of fair play. actions are amenable, in the panorama of judicial review only to the extent that the state must act validly for discernible reasons, not whimsically for any ulterior purpose. the meaning and true import and concept of arbitrariness is more easily visualized than precisely defined ..... 1800 square meters is barest minimum requirement, hence the remaining plot be also allotted. the petitioners have sent thereafter two. letters under right to information act, which according to the petitioners were not considered except informing that their application has been sent to the project director. the petitioners filed this writ petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 2010 (HC)

Pardeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation of U.P. Ltd. Vs. Offi ...

Court : Allahabad

..... based upon justice, equity and good conscience and authorises consumer redressal forums and commissions to grant interest appropriately under the circumstances of each case. in ghaziabad development authority vs. union of india and another air 2000 sc 2003 the supreme court held that in appropriate cases on equitable ground the court can award interest. ..... the absence of any agreement or statutory provisions, in the matter of sale of movable properties by company court, for which a procedure is provided under the companies act, 1956, and companies (court) rules, 1959, the code of civil procedure or the principles given under it for auction sale are not applicable. the company court ..... provisions of sale of movable property under cpc are also not applicable, ipso facto, to the sale by the official liquidator/company judge under the companies act, 1956 and further that the principles of bailment are also not applicable, in case of deposit of money as sale consideration by the highest bidder in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2011 (HC)

Smt. Madhulika Pathak Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... correct legal principles and not by multiplying illegality vide anand buttons v. state of haryana, air 2005 sc 565 and kastha niwarak gss maryadit indore v. president indore development authority, air 2006 sc 1142. 21. it is not denied that the petitioner is receiving family pension of rs.12507/- and has received about rs.8 lacs towards service ..... interpreting regulations 101, 103, 104, 106, 107 and regulation 105-a of chapter iii of the regulations made under section 16g of the u.p. intermediate education act that if vacancy in non-teaching cadre for the time being does not exist in any recognised aided institutions, then the appointment shall be made against the supernumerary non ..... comparison will neither serve rule of equality nor rule of equity. it is well known principle of law that two wrongs do not make one right and that illegal act should not be perpetrated in the name of serving the principle of equality. the equality is served of adhering to the rule of law, and not by violating .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1982 (TRI)

Cawnpore Sugar Works Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Reported in : (1982)2ITD654(All.)

..... (3) of section 194a do not cover the payees under consideration here. there was no material either before the lower authorities or before us to show that the co-operative cane development unions or co-operative cane development councils were wholly financed by the government and, therefore, even the notification no. 3489 dated 29-10-1970 cannot be ..... by sub-section (1) of section 194a and sub-section (1) of section 201.there is also no discretion vested in any authority to waive or reduce this interest which is fixed under the act. it has not been shown to us that the interest levied under sub-section (1a) of section 201 has not been correctly ..... 22-10-1970 whereby there was exemption from deduction of tax at source on payments made to any undertaking or body including a society registered under the societies registration act, 1860, financed wholly by the government. in these circumstances, according to dr. vaish, considering the purpose of chapter xvii under which section 194a appears, it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 2007 (HC)

Ateeq Ahamad Son of Haji Firoz Ahmad Vs. the State of U.P. Through Sec ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2007(4)AWC3916

..... . the application filed by the petitioner for compounding the construction raised in contravention of the sanctioned plan must be examined by the vice chairman of the allahabad development authority as provided under section 32 of the act.17. in view of the above, we dispose of the petition requesting the respondent no. 3 to consider the application filed by the petitioner for, compounding ..... contravention of the sanctioned plan in view of the provisions of section 32 of the u.p. urban planning and development act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1973). the application of the kind, referred to above, is decided by the vice chairman of the development authority and person aggrieved, by the order passed by the vice chairman under section 32 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 04 2011 (HC)

Prem Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... be made to following cases. 1. (1988) 2 scc 602, a.r.antulay versus r.s.nayak (para 42). 2. (1990) 3 scc 682, punjab land development and reclamation corporation ltd. versus presiding officer, labour court, (para 42.) 3. (2001) 6 scc 356, fuerst day lawson ltd. versus jindal exports limited (paras 19 ..... eligibility list of general category candidates. 153. rule 5 provided that where the criterion for promotion is seniority subject to the rejection of unfit, the appointing authority shall prepare three lists to be called the eligibility lists of the senior-most eligible candidates from each of the category, namely, general, scheduled castes ..... inadequately represented would not mean following of constitutional limitations and requirements prescribed therein. 139. while making such a provision under section 3(7) of the act of 1994, the state did not undertake any exercise for having quantifiable data with regard to backwardness of the class, inadequate representation and efficiency of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2005 (HC)

New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Sughra and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : IV(2006)ACC642

..... in terms of money and, therefore, it would be included in the definition of 'wages' as per the definition of wages given in the act. the next question is regarding the authority of the workmen's compensation commissioner to modify the award without issuing notice and without giving any opportunity to the insurance company. the learned counsel ..... be a specific provision in the policy itself. we are not able to accept the plea.22. even otherwise when compensation is to be awarded under the act and the act also provides for award of interest on the compensation, so awarded, it cannot be taken to mean that interest so awarded would not form part of ..... not raised before the commissioner but we give the following reasons for rejecting the said plea also. in the application for paying compensation moved under section 3 of the act, the claimants have claimed the amount of compensation along with interest. the owner of the vehicle, namely, respondent no. 5, praveen chandra rastogi, has admitted in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2010 (HC)

Sanjay Kumar Sharma Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and Other ...

Court : Allahabad

..... others). 8. air 1990 sc 1305 (miss raj soni v. air officer in charge administration and another). 9. air 1999 sc 753 (u.p. state co-operative land development bank ltd. v. chandra bhan dubey and others). 10. air 2005 sc 411 (virendra kumar srivastava v. u.p. rajya karmachari kalyan nigam and another). 11. (2009) ..... of the writ petition as also the rejoinder affidavit filed by the petitioner before the learned single judge to contend that, the deep and pervasive control of the authorities of the air force clearly establishes, that the entire administrative, functional and financial control over the institution is of the air force department and hence the writ ..... not contain any specific averment so as to substantiate the plea of deep and pervasive control of the air force authorities, and the school being established, run and managed by a society registered under the societies registration act, 1860, its actions can not be subjected to a writ petition in relation to the terms and conditions of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2003 (HC)

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. U.P. Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad Shramik San ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2004(1)AWC159; (2004)1UPLBEC77

..... that the job requires may differ from job to job. it must be left to be evaluated and determined by an expert body. the same view was expressed in ghaziabad development authority v. vikram chaudhary, (1995) 5 scc 210.33. in state of haryana v. jasmer singh. 1997 (1) awc 2.145 (noc) : (1996) 11 scc 77, the supreme ..... or official work as performed by the clerks or officials of the board. they were merely assisting the clerks by carrying files, documents and papers. some times they acted as messengers. their job was not done independently. they were manual workers and labourers employed for specific purposes.6. it is alleged in para 8 of the petition that ..... for the parties.3. the petitioner no. 3, board of high school and intermediate education, u.p., is a statutory body established under the u.p. intermediate education act, 1921, as amended from time to time. its headquarter is at allahabad. it is an examining body that holds board of high school and intermediate examinations every year. as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2010 (HC)

Ms. S.K. and Associates and anr. Vs. Indian Farmer and Fertilizers Coo ...

Court : Allahabad

..... the judgment of rohtas industries (air 1976 sc 425) came up for consideration before the apex court in the case of raipur development authority (supra). it was sought to be contended that under the act of 1940 the arbitrators were bound to give reasons as that was a requirement of natural justice and in the event reasons were not ..... the arbitral tribunal under the act of 1996 would be such other person to whom a writ could go under article 226 of the constitution. before proceeding to consider that aspect of the matter, it is essential to refer to the subsequent judgment of the apex court in the case of raipur development authority v. m/s. chokhamal contractors ..... that this court can exercise the extra ordinary jurisdiction under article 226. as pointed out earlier, a writ can go to any person or authority. under the act of 1940 arbitrations under the arbitration act, 1940 have been held to be in the nature of private arbitrations and not in exercise of the state's sovereign judicial power. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //