Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Kamat - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 19 1927

Venkatraman Mukund Kamat Vs. Janardhan Baburao Kamat

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-19-1927

Reported in: AIR1928Bom8; (1927)29BOMLR1522

Matched in: Parties Venkatraman Mukund Kamat Vs. Janardhan Baburao Kamat


Dec 16 1926

Seshgiri Narayan Kamat Vs. Venkatesh Laxman Kamat

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-16-1926

Reported in: AIR1927Bom221; (1927)29BOMLR344; 101Ind.Cas.432

Matched in: Parties Seshgiri Narayan Kamat Vs. Venkatesh Laxman Kamat


Jan 13 2005

Umesh Kamat Vs. State of Bihar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-13-2005

Reported in: AIR2005SC726; 2005(1)BLJR174; (2005)3CALLT17(SC); 2005CriLJ908; [2005(2)JCR43(SC)]; JT2005(1)SC466; (2005)9SCC200

gun. The Judicial Magistrate examined as PW6 stated that PW1 pointed out to him that the appellant Umesh Kamat was one of those having gun in his hand. The Magistrate also stated that in the second identification


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 05 2003

Ramakrishna Kamat and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-05-2003

Reported in: AIR2003SC1530; [2003(96)FLR1159]; JT2003(2)SC88; 2003(1)SCALE638; (2003)3SCC374; 2003(1)UJ764(SC); (2003)1UPLBEC831

Matched in: Parties Ramakrishna Kamat and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.


Mar 04 2002

Padmavati Devadatta Kamat and ors. Vs. Vijaykumar Narayan Mehandale an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-04-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC1262; 2002(4)BomCR120; (2002)3BOMLR265; JT2002(3)SC120; (2002)2MLJ90(SC); 2002(2)SCALE434; (2002)3SCC299

case himself, as an exceptionalcase, we decided to allow the review petition and heard the 4thappellant Dinesh Devadatta Kamat on merits of the case at length.We also permitted the said appellant to file written submissionswithin four weeks


Mar 29 1989

Smt. Lata Kamat Vs. Vilas

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-29-1989

Reported in: AIR1989SC1477; [1989]2ITR48(SC); JT1989(3)SC48; 1989MPLJ372(SC); 1989(1)SCALE867; (1989)2SCC613; [1989]2SCR137; 1989(2)LC192(SC)

Matched in: Parties Smt. Lata Kamat Vs. Vilas


Feb 20 1980

Ramchandra A. Kamat Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-20-1980

Reported in: AIR1980SC765; [1981]51CompCas337(SC); (1980)2SCC270; [1980]2SCR1072; 1980(12)LC394(SC)

P.S. Kailasam, J.1. The Petitioner Ramchandra A. Kamat has preferred this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of writ


Apr 25 1985

Narcinva V. Kamat and anr. Vs. Alfredo Antonio Doe Martins and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-25-1985

Reported in: AIR1985SC1281; (1985)87BOMLR357; [1985]58CompCas383(SC); 1985(1)SCALE947; (1985)2SCC574; [1985]3SCR951; 1985(17)LC1052(SC)

to her injuries and Sita Gomes recovered. The offending vehicle was a pick-up van belonging to Narcinva v. Kamat, a firm carrying on business at Margao, Goa. The vehicle was insured with the insurance company. Two petitions


Mar 26 2015

Devendra N Kamat Vs. Modelama Exports Ltd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-26-2015

Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa & Mr. Amritansh Batheja, Advocates + (ii) CRL.M.C. 4109/2014 & Crl.M.As.14015/14, 14543/14 DEVENDRA N KAMAT Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Virender Goswami, Ms. Soni Singh, Ms. Swati Goswami & Mr. Shubham Aggarwal, Advocates versus


May 17 2013

Vijay Kumar Kamat Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-17-2013

NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :17. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.A.1181/2010 VIJAY KUMAR KAMAT ....Appellant Through : Mr.Chetan Lokur, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. ASI


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial