Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

K - Judgment Search Results

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 29 2026

K vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 5314/2024 K .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State


Feb 15 2017

K vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-15-2017

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. h February, 2017 Crl.M.A.14459/2016(Spl. Leave for filing appeal) & CRL.A.664/2015 K Represented by: Mr. A.K. Dey, Adv. ........ Petitioner/Appellant versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....


Nov 09 2016

K vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-2016

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI K Decided on:9. h November, 2016 CRL.M.C. 4/2016 Represented by: Mr. Bharat Dubey, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 16 2018

K vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 1081/2018 Judgment delivered on:16. 04.2018 K ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in


Jul 15 1981

P. Vs. K.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-15-1981

Reported in: AIR1982Bom400; 1982(1)BomCR454

'that you have suppressed the material facts and your sexual lapse and defect, which were within youth own knowledge.' It is therefore, clear that the notice proceeds on the basis of non-disclosure of sexual lapse i.e loss


Jun 06 1986

K. Vs. Abdulla V. Income Tax Officer and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-06-1986

Reported in: (1986)56CTR(Kar)41

other similarly placed to hostile discrimination and the same offends Art. 14 of the Constitution of India.4. Sri K. Srinivasan, ld. senior standing counsel for the Revenue, argued that the Finance Act, had only provided for aggregation


Dec 16 1985

K. Vs. Krishnaswamy Naidu and Co. V. Commissioner of Income Tax and Ot ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-16-1985

Reported in: (1987)51CTR(Mad)154; [1987]166ITR244(Mad)

you consider it necessary in the interests of Revenue.'This can hardly be considered as conferring jurisdiction of any kind on the Assistant Director of Inspections. Learned counsel then referred to a decision of the single judge of


Mar 09 1971

K. Vs. Srinivasan V. Income-tax Officer, Collection Branch, Circle Ii ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-09-1971

Reported in: [1972]83ITR299(Mad)

August 1, 1970, he entered into an agreement with Sri Annamalai Mudaliar, residing at No. 27, Padavatta Amman Koil Street, Madras-7, for the sale of the property for Rs. 60,000. One of the terms of the agreement


Jul 04 2006

R.G. Nagia Vs. K

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-04-2006

1. By way of this Review Application, review applicant seeks review of our order dated 20.04.2006 passed in TA-5/2000.2. We have perused our order dated 20.04.2006 and do not find either any error apparent on the...


Sep 30 2019

K H Nazar Vs. Mathew K Jacob

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-30-2019

INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 7699-7700 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.7792-7793 of 2019) K. H. NAZAR MATHEW K. JACOB & ORS. .... Appellant(s) Versus …. Respondent (s) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial