K - Judgment Search Results
K vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 5314/2024 K .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State
K vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2017
COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. h February, 2017 Crl.M.A.14459/2016(Spl. Leave for filing appeal) & CRL.A.664/2015 K Represented by: Mr. A.K. Dey, Adv. ........ Petitioner/Appellant versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....
K vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-09-2016
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI K Decided on:9. h November, 2016 CRL.M.C. 4/2016 Represented by: Mr. Bharat Dubey, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE
18-section briefs on any result in this list
K vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-16-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 1081/2018 Judgment delivered on:16. 04.2018 K ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in
P. Vs. K.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-15-1981
Reported in: AIR1982Bom400; 1982(1)BomCR454
'that you have suppressed the material facts and your sexual lapse and defect, which were within youth own knowledge.' It is therefore, clear that the notice proceeds on the basis of non-disclosure of sexual lapse i.e loss
K. Vs. Abdulla V. Income Tax Officer and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-06-1986
Reported in: (1986)56CTR(Kar)41
other similarly placed to hostile discrimination and the same offends Art. 14 of the Constitution of India.4. Sri K. Srinivasan, ld. senior standing counsel for the Revenue, argued that the Finance Act, had only provided for aggregation
K. Vs. Krishnaswamy Naidu and Co. V. Commissioner of Income Tax and Ot ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-16-1985
Reported in: (1987)51CTR(Mad)154; [1987]166ITR244(Mad)
you consider it necessary in the interests of Revenue.'This can hardly be considered as conferring jurisdiction of any kind on the Assistant Director of Inspections. Learned counsel then referred to a decision of the single judge of
K. Vs. Srinivasan V. Income-tax Officer, Collection Branch, Circle Ii ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-09-1971
Reported in: [1972]83ITR299(Mad)
August 1, 1970, he entered into an agreement with Sri Annamalai Mudaliar, residing at No. 27, Padavatta Amman Koil Street, Madras-7, for the sale of the property for Rs. 60,000. One of the terms of the agreement
R.G. Nagia Vs. K
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2006
1. By way of this Review Application, review applicant seeks review of our order dated 20.04.2006 passed in TA-5/2000.2. We have perused our order dated 20.04.2006 and do not find either any error apparent on the...
K H Nazar Vs. Mathew K Jacob
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-30-2019
INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos. 7699-7700 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.7792-7793 of 2019) K. H. NAZAR MATHEW K. JACOB & ORS. .... Appellant(s) Versus …. Respondent (s) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free