Court : Karnataka
..... ) s.101 117 2 indian penal code s.304 b, 498a s.304 i & ii s. 304 a, 304 b s. 306 3 juvenile justice act s. 49 4 juvenile justice care r. 12 and protection of r.12 (3), (9), (i) (iii) children rules 2007 5 ndps s.37, 35, 54, ..... 60(3) s.80, 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act ..... to be made, then, necessarily the parties affected are required to be heard to meet the principles of natural justice. 27.16 section 20 of the klgp act-2011 speaks that where any proceeding before any court or authority, immediately before the constitution of a special court is ..... provided further that, the course of the trial of summons case relating to an offence under this act, it appears to the special court that in the interests of justice, the offence shall be tried in accordance with the procedure for trial of warrant cases, the special .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... ) s.101 117 2 indian penal code s.304 b, 498a s.304 i & ii s. 304 a, 304 b s. 306 3 juvenile justice act s. 49 4 juvenile justice care r. 12 and protection of r.12 (3), (9), (i) (iii) children rules 2007 5 ndps s.37, 35, 54, ..... 60(3) s.80, 8-10, 2 (xiv) s.25, 35 r/w 54, 53-a6cr.p.c s.303, 228, 128(1) 7 prevention of s.20, 7 corruption act ..... to be made, then, necessarily the parties affected are required to be heard to meet the principles of natural justice. 27.16 section 20 of the klgp act-2011 speaks that where any proceeding before any court or authority, immediately before the constitution of a special court is ..... provided further that, the course of the trial of summons case relating to an offence under this act, it appears to the special court that in the interests of justice, the offence shall be tried in accordance with the procedure for trial of warrant cases, the special .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... , the land in question. the said notification was followed by a declaration and final notification dated 28.12.1986 issued under section 19(1) of the bda act. it is stated at the bar that the award in respect of the subject land was passed on 07 ..... and such status of the property is incapable of being altered by fiction of law either by the state act or by the central act. both these acts do not contain any provision in terms of which property, once and absolutely, vested in the state can be ..... scheme has been implemented. it is called hsr layout and the preliminary and final notifications were issued way back at 1984 and 1986. the award was passed on 07.07.1987 and the possession was taken on 15.07.1987. subsequently, the allotments have been ..... r in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the01t day of december, 2020 present the hon ble mrs.justice b.v.nagarathna and the hon ble mr.justice n.s.sanjay gowda w.a.no.1415/2018 (la bda) between: sri. l.ramareddy, son of late linga .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... wrongs. it is used for enforcement of various rights of the public or to compel public/statutory authorities to discharge their duties and to act within their bounds. it may be used to do justice when there is wrongful exercise of power or a refusal to perform duties. this writ is admirably equipped to serve as a judicial ..... 6 schemes. these writ petitions and writ appeal having been heard through video conferencing hearing and reserved for judgment, coming on for pronouncement of judgment, this day, chief justice delivered the following:15. judgment overview:1. the event which lead to filing of this group of petitions is the notice dated 23rd april, 2020 issued by the ..... and another32 and in particular, what is held in paragraphs 65 and 70 thereof. he relied upon the decision of the madras high court in the case of 30 (1986) 4 scc35231 air1963sc43332 (2013) 1 scc190 c.duraiswami iyengar and another vs- the united india life assurance co. ltd33. he relied upon the said decision in support .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... in a given case amounts to denial of right guaranteed or is arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair or biased, gross abuse of power or violation of principles of natural justice, the same can be questioned on the well- known grounds attracting article 14 but a claim based on mere legitimate expectation without anything more cannot ipso facto give ..... free from all encumbrances such status of the property is incapable of being altered by fiction of law either by the state act or by the central act i.e., bda act or la act, 1894 as these acts do not contain any provision in terms of which property, once and absolutely, vested in the state could be reverted to ..... the acquisition notification and obtained interim order, which came to be dismissed on 23/11/1987. the father of petitioner, namely, muniveerappa also filed w.p.17707/1986 challenging the acquisition notification relating to 4 acres 30 guntas and obtained interim order, which ultimately came to be dismissed on 08/03/1991. thereafter, father of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... to the sanction by competent authority to prosecute a government servant. the effect of section 19(3) and section 4 of the pc act is of considerable significance. significantly the failure of justice is relatable to error, omission or irregularities in the sanction. therefore, mere error, omission or irregularity in sanction is not considered fatal unless it has ..... no.2 m.s.ravindra which is maintained therein with slight variation signature of accused no.2 m.s.ravindra by forging the date as of 09.10.1986 and make it appear that the said specimen signature card was obtained during opening of the account though it was fabricated in the year 1990. the same has ..... conspiring with second accused m.s.ravindra. the learned counsel for the appellant has placed reliance in the case of state of kerala vs. thomas alias boby reported in (1986) 2 scc411and common cause vs. union of india reported in air2017sc540 para nos. 13 to 20 of the said judgment reads as under: 13. shri mukul rohatgi, learned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... hostile interrogation during cross-examination) and his apparent power or lack of power of recollection . 4) in the book on appreciation of evidence in criminal cases by justice u.l. bhat, he has stated as follows:- demeanor of witnesses section 280 of the criminal procedure code empowers courts to record remarks about the witnesses demeanour in the witness ..... 09.1992. even as per the deposition of shivaraman, he was not working in vigilance department at that point of time. he was working from 9.10.1986 to 09.05.1992. ex.p34 is the copy of the partnership deed dated 9.11.1989 which shows that m.chandrashekar and m.vijayashekar, both children ..... their criminal conspiracy? 9. whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt that the accused have committed the offence of criminal misconduct within the meaning the prevention of corruption act? 10. what order? 4. heard learned senior counsel, mr.p.s.rajagopal appearing for the appellant, as also mr.c.h.jadhav, learned senior counsel .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... hostile interrogation during cross-examination) and his apparent power or lack of power of recollection .4) in the book on appreciation of evidence in criminal cases by justice u.l. bhat, he has stated as follows:- demeanor of witnesses section 280 of the criminal procedure code empowers courts to record remarks about the witnesses demeanour the witness box ..... 09.1992. even as per the deposition of shivaraman, he was not working in vigilance department at that point of time. he was working from 9.10.1986 to 09.05.1992. ex.p34 is the copy of the partnership deed dated 9.11.1989 which shows that m.chandrashekar and m.vijayashekar, both children ..... of their criminal conspiracy?.9. whether the prosecution proves beyond reasonable doubt the accused have committed the offence of criminal misconduct within the meaning the prevention of corruption act?.10. what order?.4. heard learned senior counsel, mr.p.s.rajagopal appearing for the appellant, as also mr.c.h.jadhav, learned senior counsel .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... of the society by its order dated 14-11-1985 as per annexure r-i. after issuance of notification dated 29.3.1986 under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the act, the landowners made representations to the government and the state government overruled the objections of the writ petitioners and issued directions for ..... various grounds challenging the notifications. the important ground raised by the writ petitioners/respondents herein are that, the provisions under part vii of the land acquisition act (hereinafter referred to la act for short) had not been complied and sections 38 to 40 have not been strictly followed, therefore, the acquisition was illegal. further, it was ..... this aspect. before adverting to the said rulings, it is seen that the ministry of law and justice has promulgated an ordinance on 30.05.2015 intending to bring some amendment to section 24(2) of the new act incorporating the following,- if the compensation is lying deposited in the court or in any designated account .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... for the benefit of the society by its order dated 14- 11-1985 as per annexure r-i. after issuance of notification dated 29.3.1986 31 under sub-section (1) of section 4 of the act, the landowners made representations to the government and the state government overruled the objections of the writ petitioners and issued directions for taking further proceedings ..... considered this aspect. 54 before adverting to the said rulings, it is seen that the ministry of law and justice has promulgated an ordinance on 30.05.2015 intending to bring some amendment to section 24(2) of the new act incorporating the following,- if the compensation is lying deposited in the court or in any designated account maintained for the ..... r1in the high court of karnataka, bengaluru dated this the29h day of march, 2016 :present: the hon ble mr.justice mohan m. shantanagoudar :and: the hon ble mr.justice k.n. phaneendra w. a. no.5279/2003 (la) and w.a. nos.5280-5281/2003 (la) and w. a. nos.5282-5283/2003 (la) in w.a. no. .....
Tag this Judgment!