Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 chapter i preliminary Page 3 of about 661 results (0.257 seconds)

May 09 1996 (HC)

Rakesh Gupta and Others, Etc. Vs. Hyderabad Stock Exchange Ltd. and Ot ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1996AP413; 1996(2)ALT757; [1999]96CompCas645b(AP)

..... of 1956); (d) the general insurance corporation of india constituted under the general insurance corporation (nationalisation) act, 1972 (57 of 1972); (e) the unit trust of india, establishedunder the unit trust of india act, 1963 (52 of1963); (f) the industrial credit and investment corporation of india, a company registered under the companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956); (g) the subsidiaries of any of the corporations or ..... companies specified in (a) to (f) and any subsidiary of the state bank of india or any nationalised bank set up for providing merchant banking services, buying and selling securities and other similar activities .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 1991 (HC)

A.P.S.R.T.C. Vs. the Government of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1992AP109; 1991(2)ALT48

..... 217(2)(a) ?5. before dealing with the points, we shall refer to the provisions of the old and new acts. the old motor vehicles act, 1939 contains a group of provisions in chapter iv-a in regard to nationalised transport services. section 68-b gives overriding effect to the provisions of the chapter. section 68-c deals with preparation and ..... s. 68c. in fact, it was held in janardan's case : [1960]3scr85 that proceeding under s. 153-c of the repealed act or the jurisdiction of the district court under the old companies act, 1913 was not affected.26. that brings us to another submission for the writ petitioners that a draft scheme for modification published in exercise of ..... . (abdul aziz v. state of bombay) : air1958bom279 .32. again in raja narayananlal v. m. p. mistry : [1961]1scr417 , the supreme courtheld, relying on s. 658 of the companies act, 1956 that an inspector appointed under s. 138(4) before 1-4-1956 could proceed with the investigation under that section even after the new .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 2000 (HC)

Halar Utkarsh Samiti Through Prakash H. Doshi Vs. State of Gujarat Thr ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)2GLR964

..... judgment, it is mentioned that sub-section (1) provides that when the government is satisfied that a particular land is needed for a public purpose or for a company, a declaration shall be made 'to that effect'. the satisfaction of the government after consideration of the report, if any, made under section 5a is a condition ..... (2000)iillj648sc (union of india & anr. v. g. ganayutham), para 28, p. 3395. (viii) : air1999sc393 (raunaq international ltd. v. i.v.r. construction ltd, & ors.) . (ix) 1999 (95) company cases 772 (securities and exchange board of india v. alka synthetics ltd. & ors.) (x) 'principles of statutory interpretation' by justice g. p. singh, sixth edition, 1996, p. 6. 27th july ..... the fourth one is again of i.o.c. which was established in 1997, i.e. after the commencement of the act, (4) if the pipelines of private companies are already there in existence and the grant of authorisation in such cases such as reliance petroleum ltd. when it was challenged before the high .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 18 1984 (HC)

C.V. Raman and ors. Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas126(Mad); (1984)IILLJ34Mad

..... before out learned brother, ramanujam, j. (see [1984] 64 fjr 140). the learned judge, on an analysis of the shops act and on going through the important provisions of the banking companies (acquisition of undertakings) act, 1970, hereinafter referred to as the nationalisation act, came to the conclusion that the bank of india was an establishment under the government of india and, therefore, section 4 ..... the government and the employees need not detain us. 31. originally banking companies were governed by part x-a of the companies act, 1913. in 1949, the banking regulation act was enacted. therefore, part x-a was repealed. under the banking regulation act, the reserve bank exercised several controls. by the nationalisation act (central act 5 of 1970), if a change was brought about in the structure of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1982 (SC)

National Textile Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. P.R. Ramakrishnan and Ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC75; [1983]53CompCas184(SC); (1983)1CompLJ1(SC); (1983)ILLJ45SC; (1983)IIMLJ1(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1144; (1983)1SCC228; [1983]1SCR922

..... this court in the case of hind overseas private limited v. raghunath prasad jhunjhunwala and ors. : [1976]2scr226 :although the indian companies act is modelled on the english companies act, the indian law is developing on its own lines. our law is also making significant progress of its own as and when necessary. ..... against the making of such order. it would be violative of the basic principle of fair procedure and unless there is express provision in the companies act 1956 which forbids the workers from appearing at the hearing of the winding up petition and participating in it, the workers must be held ..... nationalisation as two of the roads to socialism. private corporations hitherto regarded as bastions of private property and leaders of capitalist economy are undergoing transformation and, are surely acquiring the character of public institutions. the public interest element is now quite a predominant factor in the companies act itself. there are several provisions in the companies act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 1992 (HC)

Bomi Munchershaw Mistry Vs. Kesharwani Co-operative Housing Society Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR329

..... of preventive injunctions a covenantor and covenantee may occupy the position contemplated by the presumption. section 11 mandates specific performance subject to the exceptions of the act where the act agreed to be done is in the performance, wholly or partly, of a trust. section 14(1)(a) stipulates a non-performance decree where ..... common solicitors were not called upon by defendant 1 to produce the original. the document purports to record an agreement between ratanchand and maneck mistry-the latter acting in his individual capacity. the location of ex. soc-14 has an interesting story behind it. phadke, while investigating the title of the vendor came across ..... first defendant that of keeping the same unbuilt upon and provide convenient ingress and egress? 15. (a) does defendant no. 1 establish that it entertained and acted upon a bona fide belief about the height restriction covenant being limited to site under the existing garages? (b) if so, whether enforcement of the height .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1983 (HC)

Assistant Collector of Central Excise (Preventive), Madras Vs. V. Kris ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1986(23)ELT363(Mad)

..... 6 - " 9 " 5 " 38 " 35 " 39 " 40 " 61 -----------------------------------------------------------------------36. the provisions relating to the powers of officers under the customs act, the gold (control) act, and other central acts are analogous to some of the provisions contained in the criminal procedure code, whereunder the police officers have to investigate into the offences in compliances with those provisions as ..... the supreme court in eknath v. state of maharashtra , while examining the question whether the officer under the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 (central act no. 37 of 1954), is vested with the power of "investigation" within the meaning of that expression as occurring in section ..... under section 377(1), criminal procedure code relating to an offence investigated by the forest officers under the provisions of the indian forest act (a central act) was not competent.44. before a division bench of the bombay high court in state of maharashtra v. laxmichand barhomal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2009 (HC)

Western Coalfields Ltd. Through the Chief General Manager Vs. the Stat ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR414; 2009(111)BomLR502

..... in order to have regard to the realities of the situation. the appellant companies were incorporated under the companies act for a lawful purpose. their property is their own and it vests in them. under section 5(1) of the coal mines (nationalisation) act, 26 of 1973, which applies in the instant case, the right, title ..... has held that due to effect of order under section 5 of coal mines (nationalisation) act (26 of 1973) , rights, title and interests of erstwhile owner of colliery which vested in central government on nationalization get vested in the govt. company. such government company holds the colliery as its own & not on behalf of central government. colliery ..... utilisation of coal resources as best to subserve the common good.(3) under section 5 of the nationalisation act. the acquired properties were vested in a government company in order to carry out more conveniently the object of that act. and for that purpose the properties were freed from all encumbrances by section 6 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2009 (HC)

Mspl Limited, Rep by Its Executive Director. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(1)KCCR5(SN)

..... fact that the lease has already expired.provided further that where an area reserved under rule 58 or under section 17-a of the act is proposed to be granted to a government company, no notification under clause (ii) shall be required to be issued.provided also that where an area held under a reconnaissance permit ..... granted by the state government or were transferred and retransferred with the sanction of the state government from private individuals to juristic persons, the partnership firms or companies. the lands with mining area are situated either in the reserved forest or forest land or within the scheduled area therefore, all the mining leases or ..... metamorphosed into a litigation of a wider nature, essentially as one of, private interest versus public interest.85. the private interest is one of individuals or companies, seeking for grant of mining lease in government forest land and the larger public interest is that of conserving forests for the benefit of the present generation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2002 (HC)

Desraj Chela Baba Shri Hazur Singh Maharaj and ors. Vs. Association of ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2003Raj27; 2002(5)WLC33

..... general or collector exercising powers of the advocate general is a party, it is to be substituted by the devasthan commissioner. therefore, the rajasthan public trusts act, 1959 was enacted to achieve the object of providing better provisions for the public charitable trust, its management, and provisions for redress of grievances of the ..... rajasthan but the language of sections 16, 17 and 18 unambiguously excludes, by implication, by making specific provisions for registration of public trust under the act of 1959 which provides for establishing an authority who can accept application for registration of public trust only when principal office of the such trust are ..... advanced by the learned counsel for the parties. foremost question arises in view of the rival submissions in this appeal is whether the rajasthan public trusts act, 1959 applies to the all public trusts, whether their principal offices and principal places of the business are situated beyond the territories of the state of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //