Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 chapter i preliminary Court: karnataka Page 1 of about 264 results (0.172 seconds)

Oct 22 1982 (HC)

D.S. Gowda Vs. Corporation Bank

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1985]57CompCas668(Kar)

..... since they acquire their corporate character not from any registration under the companies act, but they are established under the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) acts, 1970 and 1980. so, only some of the provisions of the b.r. act are made applicable to the nationalised banks. 30. section 3(5) of the nationalising act provides that every new bank shall carry on and transact the ..... business of banking as defined in section 5 of the b.r. act and may engage .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2009 (HC)

Mspl Limited, Rep by Its Executive Director. Vs. the State of Karnatak ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(1)KCCR5(SN)

..... fact that the lease has already expired.provided further that where an area reserved under rule 58 or under section 17-a of the act is proposed to be granted to a government company, no notification under clause (ii) shall be required to be issued.provided also that where an area held under a reconnaissance permit ..... granted by the state government or were transferred and retransferred with the sanction of the state government from private individuals to juristic persons, the partnership firms or companies. the lands with mining area are situated either in the reserved forest or forest land or within the scheduled area therefore, all the mining leases or ..... metamorphosed into a litigation of a wider nature, essentially as one of, private interest versus public interest.85. the private interest is one of individuals or companies, seeking for grant of mining lease in government forest land and the larger public interest is that of conserving forests for the benefit of the present generation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 1997 (HC)

Chamundi Hotel (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1573

..... manufacturing co.'s case4 (supra) the 'material resources' were explained as:-'the next question for consideration is whether the coking coal mines (nationalisation) act is a law directing the policy of the state towards securing 'that the ownership and control of the material resources of the community are ..... such as distribution between ragions, distribution between industries distribution between classes and distribution between public, private and joint sectors. in 'sanjeev coke manufacturing company's case' (supra), the court held:'the distribution envisaged by article 39(b) necessarily takes within its stride the transformation of wealth from ..... be, to exclude article 31(2), the question of compensation becomes irrelevant and otiose,................................'71. in maharashtra state electricity board v. thana electric supply company and ors. : air1990sc153 , the apex court held that on matters of economic policy, the court must advert to legislative judgment, as conditioned by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1986 (HC)

Fci Loading and Unloading Workers Union Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR2579

..... profits through engagement of contract labour. the circumstances under which vtc which had employed the workmen for a period of nearly 8 years continuously had to part company with the corporation and the circumstances under which the 2nd respondent became the contractor for the corporation are not clear from the records. the corporation, if ..... .18. bundling of empty gunnies.19. stenciling of bags.20. supply of casual labour.21. loading/unloading of wooden crates, tarpaulins, gunny bales, fumigation cover/jute twine etc.'one significant fact in the tender conditions should be noticed. though the tender document consists of 55 pages of typed material in single line, there is ..... directing the abolition of the contract labour in the appellant company before it. in the appeal by special leave, the supreme court dealt with the various provisions of the act and observed in paras-42 and 43 of the judgment the salient features of the act and the obligations of the employer and the contractor for, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1986 (HC)

Rudraiah Raju Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR587

..... portions of the judgment in fertilizer corporation kamagar union, air 1981 sc 344 @ 356 on which the learned counsel relied are :-'37. assuming that the government company has acted mala fide, or has dissipated public funds, can a common man call into question in a court the validity of the action by invocation of article 42 ..... for the high court, as an administrative authority is not bound to record reasons for its decision as held by the supreme court in the case of mahabir jute mills v. shibban lal, : (1975)iillj326sc . but it cannot be said that if the statute prescribes the qualification for grant of privilege/license and the ..... at the 'chosen eight' out of whom seven were ineligible under that rule, for securing bottling licence.(3) application of an eligible applicant--the mysore sugar company, a government company, for undertaking bottling at mandya was excluded and an ineligible applicant--h. s. somashekar, the fifth respondent and a private arrack contractor--the fourth respondent, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 1985 (HC)

Sujatha Touring Talkies and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1986Kant21; ILR1985KAR2477

..... art. 246 of the constitution and entry 33 of list-11 (state list) of the 7th sch. to the constitution enacted the uniform act. the act is a consolidating and amending act. the act which received the assent of the president on 10-4-1964 came into force on 153-1971 (vide notification no.hd 50 cna 62 ..... called 'touring cinema licences' issued in their favour by the concerned district magistrates of the districts ('dms') presently under the karnataka cinemas (regulation) act of 1964 (karnataka act 23 of 1964) ('the act') and the karnataka cinemas (regulation) rules, 1971 ('the rules') for exhibiting films at the places detailed in their respective licences. the licences ..... government to exempt the matters specified therein from the operation of the act in the public interest, section 21 deals with offences by companies. section 22 provides for laying of the rules on the floor of the legislature. section 23 of the act repeals the enactments that were then in force in the several integrating areas .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 1988 (HC)

G.T. Swamy and anr. Vs. Goodluck Agencies and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1990]69CompCas819(Kar); ILR1988KAR3147

..... of his judgment observed as follows (at page 93) : 'in this application, the petitioners also pray for the stay of the winding up proceedings under section 173, companies act. this section comes into play after an order for winding up has been made it presupposes a good and valid winding-up order. in an application under this section, ..... this is the principle which has been laid down in the cases decided so far. the cases have been collected in buckley's commentary on the companies acts of england, under section 256 of the companies act, 1948, page 533 of the 13th edition, 1957, and in halsbury's laws of england, in paragraphs 1397 and 1398, volume 6, and ..... to make rules. - the supreme court, after consulting the high court - (a) shall make rules providing for all matters relating to the winding up of companies which by this act are to be prescribed; and may make rules providing for all such matters as may be prescribed, except those reserved to the central government by sub-section (5 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 2014 (HC)

Dr. Ramcharan Thiagarajan Vs. Medical Council of India and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... of appeal etc. the relevant portion of the ethics regulations, 2002 relevant for the present controversy is quoted hereunder: "7. misconduct: the following acts of commission or omission on the part of a physician shall constitute professional misconduct rendering him/her liable for disciplinary action: 7.16 before performing an ..... of ethics to be observed by medical practitioners;..." that in exercise of the powers conferred under section 20a read with section 33(m) of the imc act, the mci has framed the indian medical council (professional conduct, etiquette and ethics) regulations, 2002, inter alia, prescribing the inclusive definition of 'professional ..... provide registration to the individuals who qualify as doctors from the recognised institutions in india or abroad which is included in the schedule to the imc act; (iii) to hold inquiry or disciplinary action against a registered medical practitioner with regard to any professional misconduct; (iv)grant of letter of permission .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2005 (HC)

Ramesh Chandra Lahoti and ors. Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its Secre ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR4030; 2006(6)KarLJ102

..... buying and selling of agricultural produce and the establishment and administration of markets for agricultural produce in the state of karantaka.' the law makers amended this object of the act by act no. 43 of 1976 with effect from 29.5.1976 by substituting the words 'marketing' in place of the word 'buying and selling'. further the amended section ..... further held that the requirement of quid pro quo need not be confined to contributories alone.iv) the supreme court in agriculture market committee, rajam and ors. v. rajam jute and oil millers association, rajam, : [2003]2scr320 held that though quid pro quo is required in relation to a fee which is changed and collected by a market ..... provided for in the notified market area then the levy of market fee is justified.33. the long journey from kenwal krishna puri case in 1980 to rajam jute oil mills association case of 2003, the traditional view about the doctrine of quid pro quo has undergone a radical change. keeping in view the change in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Palekanda Jyothi Poovaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... /2019, 52609/2019, 220/2020, 3190/2020, 9647/2020, 12647/2020 (klgp) in w.p.no.47747/2017: between: shriram properties pvt. ltd., a company registered under the companies act, 1956 having its registered office at no.123, angappa naickan street chennai and administrative office at:3. d floor, mookamiba complex, no.4, lady desikachary road, ..... section:- (a) company, trust, firm, society means respectively a company defined under the companies act, 1956 (act no.1 of 1956), trust defined under the indian trust act, 1882 (act no.2 of 1882), firm defined in the indian partnership act, 1932 (act no.9 of 1932), society defined in the karnataka societies registration act, 1960 (karnataka act 17 of 1960) or ..... which may extend to rs.25,000/-. 45627.6 section 6 speaks about offences by the companies. sub-section (1) would indicate that where an offence under the act or rule made thereunder have been committed by the company, every such person who at the time of the offence was committed, was incharge of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //