Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 chapter i preliminary Page 11 of about 661 results (0.419 seconds)

Vasudev Vyas Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj62

..... for the respondents, only section 17a of the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972 ['the act of 1972'] and the amendment scheme of 2005 issued thereunder are of statutory character and rest all has been left by the legislature to be worked out by the company and the authorities concerned to determine the manner in which the ..... .e., the cases of secretary to the government and anr. v. m. senthil kumar 2005 air scw 1269; and union of india and ors. v. indian jute mills associations and ors. 2005 air scw 2723 have got no relevance even to the very question as posed by the petitioner. in m. senthil kumar (supra), ..... part of the order of high court was set aside. similarly, in the case of indian jute mills associations (supra), the question was regarding extent of power of advisory committee constituted under jute packaging materials (compulsory use in packing commodities) act, 1987 to make its recommendations to the central government for formulation of road map for progressive .....

The Staff Superintendent of State Bank of Patiala Vs. the Presiding Of ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1985(1)SLJ411(Delhi)

..... also its petition in this court, with regard to political pressure is correct. or else, why should it claim privilege from a nationalised bank or feel shy of asserting to the contrary? the assertions of the workman, to the contrary, that the order is not ..... mills case (supra) the full bench mainly relied on an earlier single bench judgment of that court in k. abdul salam and company v. state of tamil nadu and others 1973 43 f.j.r. 180(12) where the following observations were relied upon for ..... the government had communicated its decision dated 1st august, 1972 not to make the reference under section 10(1) of the act it acted in breach of the principles of natural justice to refer the matter for adjudication as per its order dated 16th august, ..... permission of the authorities is taken. this provision is in public interest and in no way affect any civil rights.(28) in srikrishna jute mills v. government of a.p. & ors. : (1977)iillj363ap (18), a division bench of andhra pradesh high court held .....

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR75; 1981MhLJ93

..... contained provisions for establishing courts to try mercantile and maritime causes similar to those established by the charters of 1683 and 1686 granted to the london company. an act of parliament of 1698 ultimately granted the monopoly of indian trade to those who contributed to it a loan of 20,00,000. the london ..... of action not exceeding five pagodas.27. for the first time the british parliament asserted its authority and control over the east indian company's activities both in india and in england by the regulating act of 1773 (st. 13 geo. iii c. 63). under this statute the governor of bengal became the governor-general in council ..... the ambit of subject-matters of legislation and the mode of their existence. the power under the regulating act was intended to apply to the east india company's settlement at fort william (calcutta) and other places subordinate thereto, while the act of 1781 authorized the making of regulations for the 'territorial acquisitions of bengal, bihar and orissa', .....

1. Mrs. Kailash Suneja (C.W. No. 5220 of 1993 and C.M. No. 1988 of 199 ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1998]231ITR318(Delhi); [1998]97TAXMAN144(Delhi)

..... finance ltd. v. appropriate authority : [1996]217itr22(guj) decided by us on march 30, 1995. considering the relevant provisions of the act as also the decision of the supreme court in barium chemicals ltd. v. company law board : [1967]1scr898 , we observed as under (page 28 of 217 itr) :a combined reading of section 269ud(1a) and ..... cit [1954] 26 itr 775; air 1955 sc 65 considered the question amongst others, whether the tribunal acted without jurisdiction in relying on the data supplied by the income-tax department behind the back of the appellant-company, and without giving it an opportunity to rebut or explain the same the court considered the case decided ..... finance ltd. v. appropriate authority : [1996]217itr22(guj) decided by us on march 30, 1995. considering the relevant provisions of the act as also the decision of the honble supreme court in barium chemicals ltd. v. company law board : [1967]1scr898 , we observed (at page 28) :the combined reading of section 209ud(1a) and (1b) of .....

State Bank of Hyderabad and Etc. Etc. Vs. Advath Sakru and Another Etc ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1994AP170; 1993(1)ALT608

..... not arise. therefore, it is authoritatively ruled by the supreme court in the above decision that the debts due to the banks which are nationalised under the provisions of banking companies act cannot be scaled down invoking the provisions of act iv of 1938. therefore, the judgments of p. kondandaramayya j. in satyanarayanaya's case : air1985ap77 (supra) as well as andh bank case (1986 ..... and the defendants therein took palce in the year 1950. a mortgage was executed for the credit given by the andhra insurance company to the debtor. in the meanwhile, life insurance corporation act, 1956 was enacted. the act provided for the nationalisation of life insurance corporation business in india by transferring all such business to a corporation established for the said purpose. sub-section .....

Shri Prabhakar S/O Gangadhar Hejib and Laxmikant S/O Shankarrao Zade V ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR624

..... not possible to accept this submission. in the case, which the supreme court was considering, the question was of entrustment that dominion over funds of bharat insurance company and in that context the observations came. it cannot be held that the property for the purpose of section 420 or 405 of the penal code would be ..... v a in the indian penal code. criminal conspiracy postulates an agreement between two or more persons to do, or cause to be done, an illegal act or an act which is not illegal, by illegal means. it differs from other offences in that mere agreement is made an offence even if no step is taken ..... appellants that when a special law prescribes a special procedure, it eclipses general provisions, is unexceptionable, but it has to be noted that the maharashtra universities act does not prescribe any special procedure for carrying out investigation into the complaints about offences concerning the university examinations or for enquiries or trials for offences arising therefrom .....

Cit Vs. Vijay Ship Breaking Corporation and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2003)181CTR(Guj)134

..... shall be payable :by means of 100 per cent confirmed irrevocable 180 days usance letter of credit with confirmation charges at seller's cost and acceptable to sellers through any nationalised indian bank (hereinafter called the opening bank) to be established in favour of the sellers for the nett amount by 19-9-1994',thus, original price of the ship ..... not be deductible item in the computation of total income if the tax payable has not been deducted at source under chapter xvii-b of the income tax act.(l) in w.j alan & company ltd. v. el nasr export & import co., a decision of the court of appeal reported in lloyds law reports (1972) vol. i at p. 313 (ca) : ( ..... or the arbitrator gives effect to the terms of the agreement and awards interest which has been agreed to be paid.(h) the decision of the supreme court in kedamath jute mfg. co. ltd. v. cit : [1971]82itr363(sc) was cited for the proposition that, whether the assessee is entitled to a particular reduction or not will depend on the .....

M/S. Shreeji Shipping Vs. C.C.E. and S.T. Rajkot

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad

..... , by a practicing cost accountant in his professional capacity, in any manner; practicing company secretary definition 65(33). "practicing company secretary" means a person who is a member of the institute of company secretaries of india and is holding a certificate of practice granted under the provisions of the company secretaries act, 1980 (56 of 1980) and includes any concern engaged in rendering services in ..... the field of company secretaryship; taxable service 65(48)(u) to a client, by a practicing company secretary in his professional capacity, in any manner; banking and other financial services definition 65(9 .....

Dr. Rajendra Vithalrao Suryavanshi Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1991(3)BomCR335; 1991CriLJ2068

..... to any post under the general insurance corporation of india or its subsidiary company. the case of accused no. 2 clearly falls under this second category of the company being an employee of a subsidiary company. therefore, under r. 1(3) of the said rules framed under general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972 being applicable to the accused no. 2, he becomes a public servant ..... central, provincial or state act or a government company as defined in s. 617 of the companies act, 1956.' united india insurance company limited is one of the companies which was acquired by the general insurance corporation of india. this corporation came to be formed as a result of a statutory legislation namely, general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972. rules were framed under this act. r. 1(3) of .....

Delhi High Court Bar Association and Another, Etc. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)1238; AIR1995Delhi323; II(1995)BC42; [1998]92CompCas849(Delhi)

..... was in excess of the constitutional mandate as contained in article 21 and bad in part. in the present case, not only nationalised banks but other banks have also to proceed under the act for recovery of their debts and the provisions regarding recovery of debts determined by the tribunal would also apply to all the banks. ..... remedies to enforce those rights and obligations have to be reciprocal, particularly, when cause of action is the same. to enforce its rights a banking company can proceed under the act, but not the party who necessarily would have to go to a civil court. that party cannot even claim set off, adjustment or counter-claim ..... , and legally recoverable on, the date of the application. (h) 'financial institution' means- (i) a public financial institution within the meaning of section 4a of the companies act, 1956(1 of 1956); (ii) such other institution as the central government may, having regard to its business activity and the area of its operation in india by notification .....