Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: jute companies nationalisation act 1980 chapter i preliminary Court: delhi Page 1 of about 104 results (0.195 seconds)

May 25 1984 (HC)

Bank of Maharashtra Vs. Om Prakash Malwaliya

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1985)ILLJ185Del

..... the central government and the provisions contained in the said act make it abundantly clear that the central government exercises ..... a long catena of decisions in which various nationalised banks have been held to be an authority within the scope of art. 12. it is for the reason that these nationalised banks have been created by statute, namely, the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970. they are wholly owned by ..... tribunal presided over by shri p. sastry, commonly known as sastry award, as modified and enacted by the industrial disputes (banking companies) decision act, 1955, the industrial disputes banking companies decision amendment act, 1957, and subsequently modified by the award of the national industrial tribunal presided over by mr. justice k. t. desai, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 1984 (HC)

The Staff Superintendent of State Bank of Patiala Vs. the Presiding Of ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1985(1)SLJ411(Delhi)

..... also its petition in this court, with regard to political pressure is correct. or else, why should it claim privilege from a nationalised bank or feel shy of asserting to the contrary? the assertions of the workman, to the contrary, that the order is not ..... mills case (supra) the full bench mainly relied on an earlier single bench judgment of that court in k. abdul salam and company v. state of tamil nadu and others 1973 43 f.j.r. 180(12) where the following observations were relied upon for ..... the government had communicated its decision dated 1st august, 1972 not to make the reference under section 10(1) of the act it acted in breach of the principles of natural justice to refer the matter for adjudication as per its order dated 16th august, ..... permission of the authorities is taken. this provision is in public interest and in no way affect any civil rights.(28) in srikrishna jute mills v. government of a.p. & ors. : (1977)iillj363ap (18), a division bench of andhra pradesh high court held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 01 1970 (HC)

1. Mrs. Kailash Suneja (C.W. No. 5220 of 1993 and C.M. No. 1988 of 199 ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1998]231ITR318(Delhi); [1998]97TAXMAN144(Delhi)

..... finance ltd. v. appropriate authority : [1996]217itr22(guj) decided by us on march 30, 1995. considering the relevant provisions of the act as also the decision of the supreme court in barium chemicals ltd. v. company law board : [1967]1scr898 , we observed as under (page 28 of 217 itr) :a combined reading of section 269ud(1a) and ..... cit [1954] 26 itr 775; air 1955 sc 65 considered the question amongst others, whether the tribunal acted without jurisdiction in relying on the data supplied by the income-tax department behind the back of the appellant-company, and without giving it an opportunity to rebut or explain the same the court considered the case decided ..... finance ltd. v. appropriate authority : [1996]217itr22(guj) decided by us on march 30, 1995. considering the relevant provisions of the act as also the decision of the honble supreme court in barium chemicals ltd. v. company law board : [1967]1scr898 , we observed (at page 28) :the combined reading of section 209ud(1a) and (1b) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1995 (HC)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and Another, Etc. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)1238; AIR1995Delhi323; II(1995)BC42; [1998]92CompCas849(Delhi)

..... was in excess of the constitutional mandate as contained in article 21 and bad in part. in the present case, not only nationalised banks but other banks have also to proceed under the act for recovery of their debts and the provisions regarding recovery of debts determined by the tribunal would also apply to all the banks. ..... remedies to enforce those rights and obligations have to be reciprocal, particularly, when cause of action is the same. to enforce its rights a banking company can proceed under the act, but not the party who necessarily would have to go to a civil court. that party cannot even claim set off, adjustment or counter-claim ..... , and legally recoverable on, the date of the application. (h) 'financial institution' means- (i) a public financial institution within the meaning of section 4a of the companies act, 1956(1 of 1956); (ii) such other institution as the central government may, having regard to its business activity and the area of its operation in india by notification .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 2012 (HC)

Ksl and Industries Ltd and Another Vs. National Textiles Corporation L ...

Court : Delhi

..... chalisgaon textile mills, chalisgaon-424101 4. dhule textile mills, dhule-424001 5. nanded textile mills, nanded-431601. d. accordingly, ntc has agreed to incorporate a company, which will act as the joint venture vehicle inter se between ntc and the strategic partner, which will in turn own, operate and run the said textile mill. e. however, ..... matter specified in article 1.2 above, to its full satisfaction, incorporate a special purpose vehicle under the provisions of the companies act, 1956, as its wholly owned subsidiary, which will act as the joint venture company inter se between ntc and the strategic partner (hereinafter referred to as jvc). the name of the jvc will be ..... as necessary in national interest. 24. it is clear from the above two objects of the company that apart from the fact that the company is wholly a government-owned company, it discharges the functions of the government and acts as an agent of the government even when it gives guarantees and it has a responsibility .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1997 (HC)

Mrs. Kailash Suneja and ors. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1998)145CTR(Del)560

..... cit (1954) 26 itr 775 : air 1955 sc 65 considered the question amongst others, whether the tribunal acted without jurisdiction in relying on the data supplied by the it department behind the back of the appellant company, and without giving it an opportunity to rebut or explain the same the court considered the case decided by the ..... angram finance ltd. vs. appropriate authority : [1996]217itr22(guj) decided by us on 30th march, 1995. considering the relevant provisions of the act as also the decision of the honble supreme court in barium chemicals ltd. vs. company law board : [1967]1scr898 , we observed (at p. 28) :a combined reading of s. 269ud(1a) and (1b) of ..... finance ltd. vs. appropriate authority : [1996]217itr22(guj) decided by us on 30th march, 1995. considering the relevant provisions of the act as also the decision of the honble supreme court in barium chemicals ltd. vs. company law board : [1967]1scr898 , we observed (at p. 28) :the combined reading of s. 269ud(1a) and (1b) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 1998 (TRI)

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1998)(62)ECC591

..... method of segmenting the market for proper analysis and effective forecasting. meaningful market-analysis and comparison must be of brands which compete with each other, price-wise or company-wise. after the change in central excise duty pattern, the basis of price-categorisation was changed from pp to ep "due to change in price-mix or ..... the standards of weights and measures (packaged commodities) rules, 1977 (for short, p.c. rules) framed under section 83 of the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (central act 60 of 1976)). rule 2(v) of the p.c. rules defines "retail sale price" as maximum price at which the commodity in packaged form may be ..... may be sold.5. cotton (control) clause 3. the textile commissioner order, 1955. may fix the maximum or minimum prices at which any cotton....6. the jute (licensing clause 8. the jute commissioner may..and control) ..fix the maximum or the minimum order, 1961. prices at which ...7. the colliery (control) clause 4. the central government may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Jeet Ram Khokhar Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Pushkar Mal Verma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 2015 (HC)

Nirmal Devi Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

..... a certified copy of a public document proved prime facie the truth of its contents. however, in view of the mandate of sections 159 and 164 of the companies act, 1956, the bombay high court was pleased to hold that prime facie the truth of contents was established.82. mr. khanna contends that the om prakash berlia ..... court has also observed at para 276. hence, printouts taken from the computers/servers by mechanical process and certified by a responsible official of the serviceproviding company can be led in evidence through a witness who can identify the signatures of the certifying officer or otherwise speak of the facts based on his personal ..... contents of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the registrar under section 10 of the companies act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence. 80. after noticing various provisions of the evidence act, 1872 and judgments rendered by various courts on the subject, it was observed as under: 6. secondly .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //