Just Compensation - Judgment Search Results

Unemployment Compensation Comm'n Vs. Aragon

Court: US Supreme Court

Unemployment Compensation Comm'n v. Aragon - 329 U.S. 143 (1946) U.S. Supreme Court Unemployment Compensation Comm'n v. Aragon, 329 U.S. … U.S. 700. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. P. 329 U. S. 156 . THE CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the Court. In May, 1940, the individual respondents filed claims for unemployment benefits with

Sushil Kumar Upadhyay vs.commissioner Employees Compensation Act & Ors

Court: Delhi

Mr. A.K. Jain and Mrs. Santosh Jain, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate for respondents No.2 and 3 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The

M/S Hadiso Construction Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.commissioner Employees Compen ...

Court: Delhi

for respondent No.2. Mr. M.K. Rathee, Mr. J.P. Sikka, Advocates for respondents No.3 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellants have challenged the order dated 09th December, 2015 whereby Commissioner, Employees’ Compensation

Aveena Milk Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs.commissioner Employees Compensation ...

Court: Delhi

3153/2018 AVEENA MILK PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Anup Trehan and Mr.Akarsh Bhalla, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for R-1. Mr.R.K. Nain, Advocate for … Through: Ms.Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for R-1. Mr.R.K. Nain, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) CAV2482018 Shri R.K.Nain, Advocate appears for respondent No.2/victim and as such the caveat

Saroj Kumar Jha vs.commissioner Workmens Compensation & Ors

Court: Delhi

Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Umesh Sharma, CGSC for UOI with Mr.Abhinav Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) C.M.24251/2018 (exemption) 1.2. Exemption is allowed subject to just … SAROJ KUMAR JHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate with the petitioner in person. versus COMMISSIONER WORKMENS COMPENSATION & ORS Through: Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC, GNCTD. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Umesh Sharma, CGSC for UOI with Mr.Abhinav Kumar, Advocate.

Sh. Pushpender Singh Chawla vs.commissioner Employees Compensation Act ...

Court: Delhi

COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Kaustubh Anshu Rai, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition assails the order dated 02.08.2019 passed by

Rajasekharan Nair vs Employees Compensation Commissioner

Court: Kerala

MUMBAI, PIN - 400059BY ADVS. G.P.SHINOD AJIT G ANJARLEKAR GOVIND PADMANAABHAN GAYATHRI S.B. ATUL MATHEWS RESPONDENT/S: 1 EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER (INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COURT), HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, 4TH FLOOR, SANTHINAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 20TH POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 1018 OF

We Care Facility Management Services, vs the Employees Compensation Co ...

Court: Kerala

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 521. BY ADVS.B.ASHOK SHENOY S.SASIKUMAR THEJALAKSHMI R.S. P.S.GIREESH ARJUN R NAIK AARON ZACHARIAS BENNY RESPONDENTS:1 THE EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER (INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL AND EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COURT), VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 2 SOMAN,SON OF BHANU, … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023 / 20TH ASWINA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 19864 OF 2023

Sohanbeer Son of Abhay Ram Vs. Workmens Compensation Commissioner/Assi ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2007(2)AWC2108; [2007(113)FLR619]

husband of respondent No. 1 died during the course of his employment. A claim application under the Workmen's Compensation Act was filed by the father, mother, brother and sister of the deceased. During the pendency of the

Raman Agnihotri Vs. Commissioner, Workmen Compensation and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2009(2)AWC1096

No. 1.2. It appears that the respondent No. 2 filed an application under Section 10 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 claiming compensation on account of injury sustained by him while working in the establishment/factory of the