Just And Equitable - Judgment Search Results

Equitable Life Assurance Society Vs. Brown

Court: US Supreme Court

paid policyholders whose policies matured from time to time their just and equitable share of such surplus to which they were it would afford ground of action, not necessarily ground for equitable jurisdiction. However, this is no such case as the language

Equitable Trust Co. and ors. Vs. Hafiz Mohammad Halim and Co. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1928All120

C.J.13. I am in full agreement with everything that Mr. Justice Sen has said, but I wish to say a few Ltd., Bombay, for its own account, in conjunction with the Equitable Trust Company of New York, New York, and the Philadelphia

Equitable Trust Co. Vs. First National Bank

Court: US Supreme Court

the purchaser of the check could know. Order reversed. MR. JUSTICE STONE, dissenting. The agreement of the bankrupts, on the faith as holder of the draft, it is, by subrogation, an equitable assignee of the bankrupts' deposit with the drawee. The first

Latzko Vs. Equitable Trust Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

traced into the hands of a trustee in bankruptcy. MR. JUSTICE STONE delivered the opinion of the Court. This case, here bankruptcy and questions similar to those considered in No. 34, Equitable Trust Co. of New York v. Rochling, ante, p. 275

Bates Vs. Equitable Insurance Company

Court: US Supreme Court

having been entered accordingly, the record was brought here. MR. JUSTICE MILLER delivered the opinion of the Court. One of the Company, 77 U.S. 10 Wall. 33 33 (1869) Bates v. Equitable Insurance Company 77 U.S. (10 Wall.) 33 ERROR TO THE

Fowler Vs. Equitable Trust Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

in point Page 141 U. S. 402 that we feel justified in making extracts from the opinion of the court. It their New York office, in a communication headed, "Agency of Equitable Trust Company, Springfield, Ills., Feb. 23, 1874," and signed by

Maclay Vs. Equitable Life Assur. Soc'y

Court: US Supreme Court

this writ of error. Page 152 U. S. 503 MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the - 152 U.S. 499 (1894) U.S. Supreme Court Maclay v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc'y, 152 U.S. 499 (1894) Maclay v. Equitable

Equitable Surety Co. Vs. Mcmillan

Court: US Supreme Court

obligation of the bond? Page 234 U. S. 454 MR. JUSTICE PITNEY, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of v. McMillan - 234 U.S. 448 (1914) U.S. Supreme Court Equitable Surety Co. v. McMillan, 234 U.S. 448 (1914) Equitable Surety

Selden Vs. Equitable Trust Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. MR. JUSTICE STRONG delivered the opinion of the Court. The Equitable Trust - 94 U.S. 419 (1876) U.S. Supreme Court Selden v. Equitable Trust Co., 94 U.S. 419 (1876) Selden v. Equitable Trust

Equitable Insurance Company Vs. Hearne

Court: US Supreme Court

to take in a part of her cargo. Marshall, Chief Justice, said: "It is the settled doctrine of the courts of Company v. Hearne, 87 U.S. 20 Wall. 494 494 (1874) Equitable Insurance Company v. Hearne 87 U.S. (20 Wall.) 494 APPEAL