Just - Judgment Search Results

Just Vs. Chambers

Court: US Supreme Court

Just v. Chambers - 312 U.S. 383 (1941) U.S. Supreme Court Just v. Chambers, 312 U.S. 383 (1941) Just

Just Society Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE(C) NO.25/2015 JUST SOCIETY ...PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA ...RESPONDENT JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J.1. The petitioner seeks a declaration to the

Just Rights For Children Alliance Vs. S. Harish

Court: Supreme Court of India

INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2161-2162 OF2024(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NOS. 3665-3666 OF2024 JUST RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN ALLIANCE & ANR. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS S. HARISH & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For

Just Preci Comps Pvt Ltd vs the General Manager

Court: Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 12TH JYAISHTA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 15754 OF 2016

Just Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Advance Magazine Publishers Inc. and anr.

Court: Delhi

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on : January 09, 2013 + FAO(OS) 36/2012 JUST LIFESTYLE PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Manmeet Arora, Advocate with Ms.Fareha Ahmed Khan, Advocate. versus ADVANCE MAGAZINE

Just Marble Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Matched in: Parties Just Marble Vs. Commissioner of Customs

M/S. Just Dial Limited Vs. M/S. Comwen Information Technologies Pvt. L ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Matched in: Parties M/S. Just Dial Limited Vs. M/S. Comwen Information Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Times Internet Ltd. Vs. Just Flowers and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: LC2007(3)525

Matched in: Parties Times Internet Ltd. Vs. Just Flowers and anr.

Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and Another Vs. M/s. Just Lifestyle ...

Court: Mumbai

a temporary injunction restraining the Defendant from using the word 'VOGUE' as part of their impugned trade mark JUST IN VOGUE or any other deceptively similar mark or trade name in relation to its goods and services.

N.R. Mukherjee and ors. Vs. Arnold Hartman Just and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1961Cal95

bonus granted to Sri N. R. Mukherjee and Sri S. Kanungo (appellants Nos. 1 and 2 respectively) is justified? To what relief are they entitled? 2. Is the discharge of Prantosh Bakshi (appellant No. 3) justified? What