Judiciary - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: judiciary Page 1 of about 34 results (0.020 seconds)Kishor M. Gadhave Patil and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, throu ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Joint Secretary or the Deputy Secretary to Government, Law and Judiciary Department at Nagpur or Aurangabad, as the case may be,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVikas Baburao Patil-Shirgaonkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through i ...
Court: Mumbai
Joint Secretary or the Deputy Secretary to Government, Law and Judiciary Department at Nagpur; (b) in the case of the Law
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Varshatai W/O. Sh. Sanjay Bagade versus the State of Maharashtra ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: [2025]4S.C.R.625
State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Judiciary, Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors. Etc. (Civil Appeal No(s). 5187-5188 of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Mukulika S. Jawalkar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra Throug ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2008(1)BomCR853; 2007(6)MhLj368
is essential to maintain faith of common masses in the judiciary, failing which it would lose its respect and esteem. Law
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Chitra Pune Vs. The State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Law Ju ...
Court: Mumbai
uninfluenced by any extraneous considerations. The members of the subordinate judiciary are not only under the control but also under the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFriedman Vs. Court on the Judiciary
Court: US Supreme Court
10 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY, 375 U.S. 10 (1963) 375 U.S. 10 FRIEDMAN, JUSTICE, v.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArvind Wamanrao Pendharkar (Deceased) (Through L.Rs. Sow. Sunita Arvin ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2007(1)BomCR287; 2006(5)MhLj85
Resolution dated 1.10.1980 was not correct and therefore Law and Judiciary Department requested the Accountant General . II by communication dated
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShiwanand Bhagwanrao Kulkarni Age 48 Years, Vs. the State of Maharasht ...
Court: Mumbai
is invested with, under the said Article control of subordinate judiciary. In the case of High Court of Judicature at Bombay
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPartur Advocate Bar Association Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through it's ...
Court: Mumbai
of the Law Commission of India on Manpower Planning in Judiciary. He relied upon the report of the Law Commission of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBar Council of Maharashtra and Goa a Statutory Authority Under Advocat ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR387; 2009(111)BomLR1143; 2009(4)MhLj112
Assistant and above in the Legal Section of Law and Judiciary Department in Mantralaya provided such employee has put in minimum
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>